|
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 49 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2010 | Oct 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Richard1="Richard1"I bet you are not.'"
Then you would be correct then as i am not......go to the top of Sandal Wildcats Class 
Why the hell do you all assume that normal residents of Wakefield would want this so that anyone who doesn't must have some affiliation to some organisation or connection with other clubs.
Get used to the fact that normal everyday people in Wakefield Don't want this blight on our land.....SIMPLE  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 49 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2010 | Oct 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Sandal Wild Cat="Sandal Wild Cat"communities.gov.uk/documents/planning-callins/pdf/197182.pdf
Have a look at this as a test case if you will.
THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (GREEN BELT) DIRECTION 2005
PLANNING APPLICATION BY NIELS LARSEN LTD FOR THE ERECTION OF REPLACEMENT WAREHOUSE AND STORE AND 2.4M HIGH BOUNDARY FENCING AND RELOCATION OF ACCESS AT UNIT 3, SPA STREET, OSSETT
PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER: 06/9946013F
This was an application to build a replacement warehouse on greenbelt land in Ossett.
It's dated 2006 but there have been no major changes to legislation/responsibilities of the SoS that rule against us- more to the contrary in recent months with the "cutting red tape/giving power back" spouted at every opportunity by the current gov.
para 2
[iAs you may know, the Secretary of State's general approach is not to interfere with the jurisdiction of local planning authorities unless it is necessary to do so. Parliament has entrusted them with responsibility for day-to-day planning control in their areas. Local planning authorities are normally best placed to make decisions relating to their areas and it is right that, in general, they should be free to carry out their duties responsibly, with the minimum of interference.[/i
para 3
[iThere will be occasions, however, when the Secretary of State may consider it necessary to call in a planning application to determine herself instead of leaving it to the local planning authority. Her policy is to be very selective about calling in planning applications. She will, in general, only take this step if planning issues of more than local importance are involved and if those issues need to be decided by the Secretary of State rather than at a local level.[/i
para 4
[iHaving carefully considered the relevant planning issues raised by this proposal, the Secretary of State has concluded that her intervention would not be justified. The application does not, in the Secretary of State’s view, raise issues of more than local significance, which would require a decision by her. The decision as to whether to grant planning permission will therefore remain with the Council.[/i
TBF even Labour knew that too much state involvement in planning is bad for business...
As I have said previously there have been no changes to legislation or responsibility from the SoS- and I don't see any matters of national significance to this application.'"
Hardly 200 acres is it mate  |
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1494 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
No but is 200 acres of [u=#0040FF[size=200national significance[/size[/u?
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1494 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Like I expected; you'd read the doc but miss my point of reference.
Just out of interest; how many GCSE's did you get (D-U don't count btw)
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 6315 | Wakefield Trinity |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2007 | 18 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1494 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Can I drive the bulldozer?
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 49 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2010 | Oct 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Sandal Wild Cat="Sandal Wild Cat"communities.gov.uk/documents/planning-callins/pdf/197182.pdf
Have a look at this as a test case if you will.
THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (GREEN BELT) DIRECTION 2005
PLANNING APPLICATION BY NIELS LARSEN LTD FOR THE ERECTION OF REPLACEMENT WAREHOUSE AND STORE AND 2.4M HIGH BOUNDARY FENCING AND RELOCATION OF ACCESS AT UNIT 3, SPA STREET, OSSETT
PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER: 06/9946013F
This was an application to build a replacement warehouse on greenbelt land in Ossett.
It's dated 2006 but there have been no major changes to legislation/responsibilities of the SoS that rule against us- more to the contrary in recent months with the "cutting red tape/giving power back" spouted at every opportunity by the current gov.
para 2
[iAs you may know, the Secretary of State's general approach is not to interfere with the jurisdiction of local planning authorities unless it is necessary to do so. Parliament has entrusted them with responsibility for day-to-day planning control in their areas. Local planning authorities are normally best placed to make decisions relating to their areas and it is right that, in general, they should be free to carry out their duties responsibly, with the minimum of interference.[/i
para 3
[iThere will be occasions, however, when the Secretary of State may consider it necessary to call in a planning application to determine herself instead of leaving it to the local planning authority. Her policy is to be very selective about calling in planning applications. She will, in general, only take this step if planning issues of more than local importance are involved and if those issues need to be decided by the Secretary of State rather than at a local level.[/i
para 4
[iHaving carefully considered the relevant planning issues raised by this proposal, the Secretary of State has concluded that her intervention would not be justified. The application does not, in the Secretary of State’s view, raise issues of more than local significance, which would require a decision by her. The decision as to whether to grant planning permission will therefore remain with the Council.[/i
TBF even Labour knew that too much state involvement in planning is bad for business...
As I have said previously there have been no changes to legislation or responsibility from the SoS- and I don't see any matters of national significance to this application.
=#FF4000So can anyone really see any issues of national significance?'"
When it states "more than of local significance" it doesn't mean that this refers to National significance, this is your assumption, it can mean a development that affects bordering villages, towns or cities and in this case it plainly does affect Leeds and it also has the effect of joining areas together which are seperated by a certain amount of green belt land (this in itself is part of government legislation) and this is the major concern of Leeds Council and WILL be the major concern of the SOS. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 290 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2008 | 17 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2019 | Jan 2019 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote falmouth2010="falmouth2010"No, i am not a Castleford fan or Featherstone rovers etc, i am a football fan more than rugby, but i am sick of you lot painting anybody who disagrees with what you think or want as some kind of loony or nimby, maybe i just think there is enough unwanted and unused industrial units around this area rather than building any more that no bugger wants or needs, just so York court can make a big fat profit and Wakefield get a Trojan horse stadium, cynically brought into the equation to sweeten this very bitter pill!'"
Just looking at your sig!!
You have either spelled it wrong(ou missing !!) or
Could you be a brighton fan,re new ground.
How ironic would that be!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 35 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jul 2012 | Jul 2012 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote falmouth2010="falmouth2010"No, i am not a Castleford fan or Featherstone rovers etc, i am a football fan more than rugby, but i am sick of you lot painting anybody who disagrees with what you think or want as some kind of loony or nimby, maybe i just think there is enough unwanted and unused industrial units around this area rather than building any more that no bugger wants or needs, just so York court can make a big fat profit and Wakefield get a Trojan horse stadium, cynically brought into the equation to sweeten this very bitter pill!'"
A football fan more than rugby who knows all the ins and outs of a Cas fringe prop who may or may not ever have been linked with a move to Trinity?
I think Foulmouth is a serial pork pie teller. |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 4259 | Rochdale Hornets |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| May 2007 | 18 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
I think this has to rank as my best ever thread! It was probably quite boring to start with but now... wow... what a first class thread!
And TRB's on holiday and missing it!
Keep Falmouth2010/Outwood Tiger I say, he/she/it is highly entertaining!
More, more, more...
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Chairman | 5392 | Wakefield Trinity |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote t-r-i-n-i-t-y="t-r-i-n-i-t-y"Why is the troll still being fed then and not banned so the issues can be discussed sensibly?'"
Good question. Why do people constantly rise to the bait?
The poster now knows what is and isn't acceptable, or at least, he should do. |
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 9974 | London Skolars |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
This is not a freak show, or at least it wasn't until outwoodfalmouthbrighton tiger turned up.
Please show some decorum!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
