He was tested during pre-season according to sky sports.

Was is Newton who sued a TV Mag or something like that, that mistakenly printed he'd failed a drug test previously?

Yep, there's a link on the Bradford forum. Typical.

it takes about 3 months for the 2nd test and proceedings to start ...

wakey player so inocennt until proven guilty in my eyes and ill give terry my full backing until otherwise

Agreed, full facts first and all that.

Recreational or performance - if its banned its banned.
Hock got 2 years for cocaine.

If it's something that's possibly happened what he was at Bradford let's hope it doesn't involve the other two ex bulls.

Problem is, as the second one takes so long, we are a player down until he is proved innocent or guity.
He can't play but we can't make a decision to recruit elsewhere.

So the anti-doping agency (or whatever they're called) don't suspend anyone until then? I can kinda understand why, innocent until proven guilty and all that, but it doesn't make the club look good when it says he failed a drugs test in November and he's played since then.

I really hope for his sake it is something he's taken unknowingly in cough medicine or something, otherwise he's just unbelievably stupid. Either way I don't want to see him play for Wakey again.

Any ideas how long it takes for results of the 2nd test?

Jeez! There is nothing like dragging everybody into it. There is nothing to say they or any other player is involved!

Listen to Paul Cullen on boots 'n all.

Suspended until his hearing which could be 6-8 weeks so either way whether he's guilty or not were not gonna see him on the field for 2months or so, if he's guilty up to a 2yr ban.

I would imagine the club will know what Terry has taken by now and will either be actively looking at players who may be available or holding out for the final outcome of the hearing knowing that it may be possible that he has unknowingly taken a banned substance.