Actually Bren2K is correct, 'Gloria' posted this before the other guy...

[iRe

Not that it matters as its a load of rubbish.

You'll find the clue if you look hard enough, think about an account thats not used very often but delivered this message, the very same message that Gloria posted

People with multiple usernames always slip up.

And yes its a load of rubbish.

apologies to bren2k I read it on a post from some numpty who only post occasionally but you can guarantee that everything he posts it tripe.

I very rarely read the board in question it is full of fools who put 2 and 2 together and come up with 52. I once posted that if I won the lottery I would pay for Billy Slater to pay for Cas, not two days later one of them posted a rumor that we were signing him this was about 2 years ago and since then anything on their is taken with a bag of salt never mind a pinch.

The internet forums are wonderful tools for genuine fans of the game to discuss the games and players etc but i just wish people wouldn't read something then add something on then start scare mongering

Totally agree - that's why I didn't do it.

Morton back for a Cas derby? Have you forgotten about the last time he played in a derby.

He was all right for the first 79mins and 50 seconds

Didn't he get the ball ripped out when bringing it away from his posts for their first try. Morton is not SL quality end of.

that was a 50/50 call on another day we would have got a pen

But no way would I drop Fox for Morton at the end of the day Fox is not the best on kick defence but his centre and 2nd rower could and should have done more as well
Fox has the pace to win any game if only he had a decent centre to feed him same old story at Wakey decent wingers poor centres

Well, we didn't get off to the best start - couple of dicey calls, silly errors (kicking out on the full) and unlucky bounces of the ball and before we know it we are 20-0 down. Add to that London are a fairly handy outfit and certainly have a nice mix of experience and youthful exuberance (2 young lads who looked tremendous prospects in the outside backs) plus our apparent inability to defend kicks and its game over at half time.

We've gone down there before with better players and been beat by much worse London sides so while its very disappointing its not entirely surprising. Inconsistency has been our middle name for years so it shouldnt come as too much of a shock.

The real test of how much the players want it is this Friday night......

that's not relevant though is it? this is a new side. why would they have a hang up?

Yes

If it's any consolation, and I realise it probably isn't;
a) I've seen us tonked like that more than I care to remember,
b) We've been shafted by Ganson more than I care to remember.
Incidentally on that second one, before anyone jumps all over me, no I'm not justifying Ganson's reffing at all. He shouldn't favour anyone, he should be nuetral and consistent. But who's ever seen Ganson ref in a nuetral and consistent manner?

Anyway, enjoy the rest of the season.

Cos we are Wakefield Trinity, and inconsistency is what we do.

We've had better groups of players than this beaten by worse outfits than London like this weekend, and on the back of beating much better opposition the week before.

Just watched Wigan v Saints; Gareth Hock gives Josh Perry a clip round the ear, then takes FIVE steps forward before playing the ball - Mr Ganson remains unmoved and actually awards Hock a penalty when Perry returns the b*tch-slap.

Un-fricking-believable.

Lol if you'd watched it closer you would have realised that Ganson wasn't even the ref.

At one point though I did think Bentham was going to penalise Wigan again and again until Saints scored.