|
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Moderator | 12537 | Wakefield Trinity |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2002 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote Richard1="Richard1"I bet you are not.'"
He's Outwood Tiger.
We all know it.  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 15521 | Wakefield Trinity |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Slugger McBatt="Slugger McBatt"Wasn't it 15,000? And as our average crowd is just over 5,000, it has to be assumed that the other 10,000 were not Wakey fans. Perhaps people who wanted a job.
Do you hear voices in your head sometimes?'"
I suspect he is fashioning a tinfoil hat at this very moment, whilst keeping a weather eye out for the black helicopters circling overhead. |
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 997 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2006 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Wildthing="Wildthing"He's Outwood Tiger.
We all know it.
'"
What a load of carbunkles!!!  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 4809 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Mar 2016 | Nov 2015 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Why is the troll still being fed then and not banned so the issues can be discussed sensibly?
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1494 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
communities.gov.uk/documents/pla ... 197182.pdf
Have a look at this as a test case if you will.
THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (GREEN BELT) DIRECTION 2005
PLANNING APPLICATION BY NIELS LARSEN LTD FOR THE ERECTION OF REPLACEMENT WAREHOUSE AND STORE AND 2.4M HIGH BOUNDARY FENCING AND RELOCATION OF ACCESS AT UNIT 3, SPA STREET, OSSETT
PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER: 06/9946013F
This was an application to build a replacement warehouse on greenbelt land in Ossett.
It's dated 2006 but there have been no major changes to legislation/responsibilities of the SoS that rule against us- more to the contrary in recent months with the "cutting red tape/giving power back" spouted at every opportunity by the current gov.
para 2
[iAs you may know, the Secretary of State's general approach is not to interfere with the jurisdiction of local planning authorities unless it is necessary to do so. Parliament has entrusted them with responsibility for day-to-day planning control in their areas. Local planning authorities are normally best placed to make decisions relating to their areas and it is right that, in general, they should be free to carry out their duties responsibly, with the minimum of interference.[/i
para 3
[iThere will be occasions, however, when the Secretary of State may consider it necessary to call in a planning application to determine herself instead of leaving it to the local planning authority. Her policy is to be very selective about calling in planning applications. She will, in general, only take this step if planning issues of more than [size=200local importance[/size are involved and if those issues need to be decided by the Secretary of State rather than at a local level.[/i
para 4
[iHaving carefully considered the relevant planning issues raised by this proposal, the Secretary of State has concluded that her intervention would not be justified. The application does not, in the Secretary of State’s view, raise issues of more than local significance, which would require a decision by her. The decision as to whether to grant planning permission will therefore remain with the Council.[/i
TBF even Labour knew that too much state involvement in planning is bad for business...
As I have said previously there have been no changes to legislation or responsibility from the SoS- and I don't see any matters of national significance to this application.
=#FF4000So can anyone really see any issues of national significance?
|
|
communities.gov.uk/documents/pla ... 197182.pdf
Have a look at this as a test case if you will.
THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (GREEN BELT) DIRECTION 2005
PLANNING APPLICATION BY NIELS LARSEN LTD FOR THE ERECTION OF REPLACEMENT WAREHOUSE AND STORE AND 2.4M HIGH BOUNDARY FENCING AND RELOCATION OF ACCESS AT UNIT 3, SPA STREET, OSSETT
PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER: 06/9946013F
This was an application to build a replacement warehouse on greenbelt land in Ossett.
It's dated 2006 but there have been no major changes to legislation/responsibilities of the SoS that rule against us- more to the contrary in recent months with the "cutting red tape/giving power back" spouted at every opportunity by the current gov.
para 2
[iAs you may know, the Secretary of State's general approach is not to interfere with the jurisdiction of local planning authorities unless it is necessary to do so. Parliament has entrusted them with responsibility for day-to-day planning control in their areas. Local planning authorities are normally best placed to make decisions relating to their areas and it is right that, in general, they should be free to carry out their duties responsibly, with the minimum of interference.[/i
para 3
[iThere will be occasions, however, when the Secretary of State may consider it necessary to call in a planning application to determine herself instead of leaving it to the local planning authority. Her policy is to be very selective about calling in planning applications. She will, in general, only take this step if planning issues of more than [size=200local importance[/size are involved and if those issues need to be decided by the Secretary of State rather than at a local level.[/i
para 4
[iHaving carefully considered the relevant planning issues raised by this proposal, the Secretary of State has concluded that her intervention would not be justified. The application does not, in the Secretary of State’s view, raise issues of more than local significance, which would require a decision by her. The decision as to whether to grant planning permission will therefore remain with the Council.[/i
TBF even Labour knew that too much state involvement in planning is bad for business...
As I have said previously there have been no changes to legislation or responsibility from the SoS- and I don't see any matters of national significance to this application.
=#FF4000So can anyone really see any issues of national significance?
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 49 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2010 | Oct 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Richard1="Richard1"I bet you are not.'"
Then you would be correct then as i am not......go to the top of Sandal Wildcats Class 
Why the hell do you all assume that normal residents of Wakefield would want this so that anyone who doesn't must have some affiliation to some organisation or connection with other clubs.
Get used to the fact that normal everyday people in Wakefield Don't want this blight on our land.....SIMPLE  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 49 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2010 | Oct 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Sandal Wild Cat="Sandal Wild Cat"communities.gov.uk/documents/planning-callins/pdf/197182.pdf
Have a look at this as a test case if you will.
THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (GREEN BELT) DIRECTION 2005
PLANNING APPLICATION BY NIELS LARSEN LTD FOR THE ERECTION OF REPLACEMENT WAREHOUSE AND STORE AND 2.4M HIGH BOUNDARY FENCING AND RELOCATION OF ACCESS AT UNIT 3, SPA STREET, OSSETT
PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER: 06/9946013F
This was an application to build a replacement warehouse on greenbelt land in Ossett.
It's dated 2006 but there have been no major changes to legislation/responsibilities of the SoS that rule against us- more to the contrary in recent months with the "cutting red tape/giving power back" spouted at every opportunity by the current gov.
para 2
[iAs you may know, the Secretary of State's general approach is not to interfere with the jurisdiction of local planning authorities unless it is necessary to do so. Parliament has entrusted them with responsibility for day-to-day planning control in their areas. Local planning authorities are normally best placed to make decisions relating to their areas and it is right that, in general, they should be free to carry out their duties responsibly, with the minimum of interference.[/i
para 3
[iThere will be occasions, however, when the Secretary of State may consider it necessary to call in a planning application to determine herself instead of leaving it to the local planning authority. Her policy is to be very selective about calling in planning applications. She will, in general, only take this step if planning issues of more than local importance are involved and if those issues need to be decided by the Secretary of State rather than at a local level.[/i
para 4
[iHaving carefully considered the relevant planning issues raised by this proposal, the Secretary of State has concluded that her intervention would not be justified. The application does not, in the Secretary of State’s view, raise issues of more than local significance, which would require a decision by her. The decision as to whether to grant planning permission will therefore remain with the Council.[/i
TBF even Labour knew that too much state involvement in planning is bad for business...
As I have said previously there have been no changes to legislation or responsibility from the SoS- and I don't see any matters of national significance to this application.'"
Hardly 200 acres is it mate  |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1494 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
No but is 200 acres of [u=#0040FF[size=200national significance[/size[/u?
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1494 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Like I expected; you'd read the doc but miss my point of reference.
Just out of interest; how many GCSE's did you get (D-U don't count btw)
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 6315 | Wakefield Trinity |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2007 | 18 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 1494 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Can I drive the bulldozer?
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 49 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2010 | Oct 2010 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Sandal Wild Cat="Sandal Wild Cat"communities.gov.uk/documents/planning-callins/pdf/197182.pdf
Have a look at this as a test case if you will.
THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (GREEN BELT) DIRECTION 2005
PLANNING APPLICATION BY NIELS LARSEN LTD FOR THE ERECTION OF REPLACEMENT WAREHOUSE AND STORE AND 2.4M HIGH BOUNDARY FENCING AND RELOCATION OF ACCESS AT UNIT 3, SPA STREET, OSSETT
PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER: 06/9946013F
This was an application to build a replacement warehouse on greenbelt land in Ossett.
It's dated 2006 but there have been no major changes to legislation/responsibilities of the SoS that rule against us- more to the contrary in recent months with the "cutting red tape/giving power back" spouted at every opportunity by the current gov.
para 2
[iAs you may know, the Secretary of State's general approach is not to interfere with the jurisdiction of local planning authorities unless it is necessary to do so. Parliament has entrusted them with responsibility for day-to-day planning control in their areas. Local planning authorities are normally best placed to make decisions relating to their areas and it is right that, in general, they should be free to carry out their duties responsibly, with the minimum of interference.[/i
para 3
[iThere will be occasions, however, when the Secretary of State may consider it necessary to call in a planning application to determine herself instead of leaving it to the local planning authority. Her policy is to be very selective about calling in planning applications. She will, in general, only take this step if planning issues of more than local importance are involved and if those issues need to be decided by the Secretary of State rather than at a local level.[/i
para 4
[iHaving carefully considered the relevant planning issues raised by this proposal, the Secretary of State has concluded that her intervention would not be justified. The application does not, in the Secretary of State’s view, raise issues of more than local significance, which would require a decision by her. The decision as to whether to grant planning permission will therefore remain with the Council.[/i
TBF even Labour knew that too much state involvement in planning is bad for business...
As I have said previously there have been no changes to legislation or responsibility from the SoS- and I don't see any matters of national significance to this application.
=#FF4000So can anyone really see any issues of national significance?'"
When it states "more than of local significance" it doesn't mean that this refers to National significance, this is your assumption, it can mean a development that affects bordering villages, towns or cities and in this case it plainly does affect Leeds and it also has the effect of joining areas together which are seperated by a certain amount of green belt land (this in itself is part of government legislation) and this is the major concern of Leeds Council and WILL be the major concern of the SOS. |
|
|
|
|
|
