Ah yes I realise now I just thought at the time he was given to us. I wonder who pays what % of his wages?

As the Administration documents show us owing Huddersfiell circa £24k, i don't think Huddersfield would be daft enough to be paying.

That would make the Brough 'deal' even more bizarre.

You're right it does. God knows what we owed them £24k for. Other than Kirmond, prior to going into Admin I can't think of one player coming to us from Huddersfield, they all go from us to them.

Maybe it was a combination of Kirmond's and Korky's wages that we owed to Huddersfield.

What did they pay us for Brough?

Undisclosed. They did let us get Kirkmond fit for the play offs and let us keep Korki who they didn't want and we already had. So given that we probably bent over and gave them 50k, 24 of which we still owe!

The Brough deal was the most bizarre, since Mike Lampokowski came to town.

Presumably it was in last seasons accounts?

Jeez, they want our player and our money, its just not Cricket.

Whatever the 24k debt is for, we should withhold payment to compensate ourselves for the ludicrous 'deal' O'Hara's did for Fergy.

after you read the administration report you get the feeling the brough deal was the biggest set of lies we have ever been told, "best deal for wakefield??"

it also for what its worth puts a new picture on the tronc situation

anyway, back to Hickey wonder when the club are going make an announcement about him?

Totally agree with that one.

It dunt had up, PS hows the wife