Last two games I have gone down to chav corner for second half. Certainly busier down there v Hull than v Wigan. Nowhere near as busy in the ground as under the Glover years.

This.....

It seemed to be a lot better than the Wigan attendance and will be bigger against Leeds onwards and upwards.

Haha the ones saying there seemed to be alot more then 5100 next game walk around the ground and do an head count if your so concerned about attendance instead of saying it looked like there were more there to me it looked bang on 5100 haha

Could anyone translate this for me please.

You remember in the film Rainman, when Tom Cruise dropped the matches on the floor? ...........that about sums it up.

As old age approaches, Vastman is becoming the "Stevo" of the message boards.

It's people like you who have allowed the club to get in the mess it has over the years by never questioning. All those mentioned were great guys at one point, Pearman, Richardson and Glover were all cheered to the rafters by "idiots" (your word not mine) like you.

How many people were saying "If I was Mr GLOVER & read this I would ask what I have to do with some supporters" 18 month ago, I bet you were though I'm certain you'll deny it. So now according to "idiots" like you "idiots" like me should again carry on unquestionably following our latest leader - unbelievable.

Personally nothing against your new messiah seems to be doing a decent job so far but I'll reserve judgement for a few years yet - just as I did with Glover which as it turned out wasn't a bad idea for an "idiot".

I'm afraid Mr Briggs the only ghostly thing about you is what lurks between your ears, that appeared to have died years ago.

What a surprise

I know what you meant, though I do believe in what I say even though you're quite right about the stirring and IMHO it needs doing. If I and a few others didn't this forum would cease to be the powerful outlet for fans feelings or the excellent vehicle it has proved to be for uncovering wrong doings. Instead it would be some mutual back slapping message board where we just talk about kits and who was out on the lash last night (though that would be nice for a bit I suppose).

All the alarm bells regarding Pearman, Richardson and Glover were rung on here first (as baz will remind me). So I'll carry on like some demented woodpecker with a grudge and those who wish to ignore me, fine.

As much as this makes no sense, you make the most sense (i'm guessing thats by accident)
We all get a feel for how many might be in the ground, but based on years of over and under reporting of figures and supporters real innabilities to 1. see through walls and 2. lack recent of recognition software updates, i think what we feel is in no way a scientific reasoning to argue for or against anyone.
Of course i may be wrong and you may all be super computers, but judging on what i read on here regularly, somehow i doubt it.