Am I thick or something.
What relevance does the ground sharing have to the LCC objections.
If Castleford were not planning a new ground or if they already had one the sharing issue would not be there.
LCC should be made to ask questions pertinent to their objections.
They seem to be using the ground share issue as extra ammunition which they would not have if said issue did not exist.

Exactly why I thought it was the inspector asking these questions, whats it got to do with LCC?? then again whats any of it got to do with them!!

Ask yourself this if you were in Eric Pickles shoes what would you sooner see in the news -WTW new ground rejected Yorkcourt now cant build and create xxx number of jobs - or New ground for WTW and development creates xxx jobs for the Wakefield district.The country is in the mire and unemployment up plus some good news is needed to calm the population down a little.Did Mr glover not say at one point he had other options if NM didnt get the go ahead now would it not be funny if NM was rejected and we found another option than to share GH.

And in further irony LCC leader Keith Wakefield was on Look North earlier moaning how they have to find a further £50 million of cuts next year and how its going to cause more job losses. He then goes on to say that despite government promises the private sector are not picking up the job losses that are being created in the public sector. And yet he is objecting to 2000 being created on his doorstep. Bit hypocritical don't you think?

They haven't got much to go on and therefore scraps is all the LCC barister has to work with... but he does seem to be building a house of cards, as I said. I am unsure of how comfortable the Methley Residents Association and the Newmarket Lane residents are now feeling with this persistent line of questioning about Cas & GH by LCC. Not sure who is pushing the argument and why they are not changing tack! I think Barton Willmore will continue the theme right to the end. They might see this as the only real viable counter argument to the stadium element of the proposals... this is all they have, so might as well stick with it approach!

Still sounds like a good day again today... but equally, when you are in driving the seat, they always are!

Are they continuing all week? I might go down on Friday if so.

Does the the Yorkcourt representive or whoever get to question LCC and Barton Willmore or not?

Yes , infact it seems that anyone can stand up and question anyone as happened this afternoon

I went along today sat in the gallery and listened to the grilling that James Elston got from the Leeds Barrister, I have to say he was very good, at one point I wanted to applaud the fact that he feels passionate about keeping Rugby League in Wakefield along with the commercial and community benefits that this brings. Very Well Done James, its a shame the Barrister knew diddly squat about RL said it all.

Richard Wright knows if we get this he is finished. If he pulls us down then he wins. He realises we will both have crappy grounds and both fail to reach required standards but he will still have his plot of land at GH with planning and that will be enough to give him the edge at the next franchise round.

I thank you Sandal!

"Amber is referred to as "northern gold". "

"Wear amber to attract warm, loyal, and generous people into your life; or carry amber on your person to lend logic or wit to a difficult situation."

or you can look at it as

the word yellow which can be used as an adjective meaning cowardly.

what ever