Keep posting them Bren... I haven't even started to look yet, but TRB says there are some belters about LCC!

*My emphasis.

It's a fascinating read!

And then comes a statement from RW www.code13rugbyleague.com/2012/0 ... m=facebook

And then comes a statement from RW www.code13rugbyleague.com/2012/0 ... m=facebook

Forgot to add thanks for everything TRB and IA and everyone else involved!!!!

I can't do anymore as I have to take the lad to training.

Will be back later with further instalments!

OH Yes Yes Yes the sleeping giants are about to Rise

"Whilst the Glasshoughton site may have planning permission there is no money to build it, nor any proposed enabling development. It is not viable or deliverable and no one suggests that it is, not even Castleford Tigers themselves"

That is an absolutely stunning statement and seems to blow holes in the possibility of there ever being a stadium development at GH.

Yes that's how I read it as well. Basically how can you share something that does not exist!

We still have hurdles and time scales to overcome, lets not worry and get bogged down with Cas.

Longer quote on Cas, which sheds light on more factors in their way.



A ground share at GH was NEVER on the cards then.
Ted's "psycho" moment at HT was bang to rights then! Good old Ted, never doubted you for a second!

actully wakie does not own the new stadium so are the new owners of your ground going to pay for the new stadium

What are you on about?

Who cares who owns it or not, a stadium is a stadium.

Thoughts on FenderBefore embarking on a discussion of the substantive issues there are two preliminary points that need to be made. Firstly, various Third Parties, especially the Methley and Mickletown Residents Association, have made allegations about a lack of proper consultation by WMDC prior to Members resolving to support the application. These allegations are utterly without foundation. The Council complied with all of the relevant statutory publicity requirements,44 as well as publicising the application and Committee Report on its website. The Applicant held public exhibitions in December 2009 before the submission of the application and in March 2010. Various objectors, including Ms. Fender, were afforded the opportunity of addressing the Planning Committee in October 2010. In any event, these allegations are irrelevant, given the fact that the SoS will be determining this application, not WMDC, and given Ms. Fender’s concession that the various groups for which she speaks (and there are many) have been given every opportunity to make their views known throughout this Inquiry.'"

MoreThe same Third Parties have insinuated that there are, or have been, inappropriate links between the developer and the Council. It is disappointing that any decent substantive points that could have been made by these objectors have been devalued by such baseless accusations.'"