And for the second time of answering, i aren't going to betray a confidence to pacify the likes of you.

So basically I have to justify everything I say especially about the previous regime - but you don't have to betray confidences to the likes of me - interesting - says a lot about you.

Frankly I just think you make it up as you go along, you're just riding the wave for all it's worth.

Your view is simplistic, unrealistic and based on assumptions and gossip - because you were not there or anywhere near. TRB's word is not gospel but I'm 100% certain it's based on more first hand knowledge than yours.

Just listen, read between the lines and try to accept most things in life are not always what they seem at first.

What FACTS have you based your assumptions on, and why would i have to be there, and have first hand knowledge to assume that the banks would look upon us as a bad investment, based on our track record rather than on back of the whole banking climate having changed?

Time is the only thing that will tell. The signs are good going forward - and I generally live in the belief that things happen for a reason. We weren't meant to get Pickles decision and, if we don't get the decision in July then we weren't meant to - that doesn't mean I won't be mightily pee'd off though!

Hold on, you're the one claiming to know something not me so why do I need any facts - I'm asking you to justify your comment, in this case I have nothing to justify - what's unreasonable about that.

I agree to a certain degree (although i'm not really into karma), i just think that (everything crossed) when we get into NM or a thoroughly revamped BV or wherever, our chances of making a decent fist of it are massively increased as a result of recent changes at the club and they came as result or other unforeseen circumstances (i think i do believe in karma after all!!!).
Fingers crossed for a more positive second half of the year.

1001 if you'd have come.

Oh come off it, you're arguing for the sake of it now. Regardless of what effect it would have had on the old regime and the new I can't see how that could be anything other than a positive - talk about cutting your nose off to spite your face.

Damn, I let the club down again - thank god you made it

It doesn't say anything about me at all, i'm just asking you for the facts, like you do, you made up the rule, i'm just establishing wether or not you subscribe to what you ask of others, and surprisingly you don't.
When you're looking up ALLEGIANCE, also look up HYPOCRITE.

No simply explaining my opinion, which you failed to understand so i made it clearer for you, if you didnt want me to you shouldnt ask, its all under HYPOCRITE if you look.

I agree with that statement - whilst appreciating that Ted is at least responsible for giving us the opportunity at NM we so crave.

It was time for change, and although Ted always claimed that the door was always open to new investors etc (and I truly believed that in his mind he believed that), I can't really see any other way that it would have come to an end than the way it did - unfortunately. In the end we lost, Ted lost, his family lost - so it's not worked out for anyone.

Enough now on this thread - time to move on!

Agreed.