Which isnt the one they first advertised

Entitled to a full refund AL as it is nothing like the one the club advertised.

If you wanted to go that far, I believe that the law is on your side; is it the Sale of Goods Act 1979 that applies?

It's a shame though that the shirt has failed to deliver, for a lot of people, what was advertised; in the words of those renowned 80's philosophers The Blow Monkeys - It doesn't have to be this way.

Well i'll see it in the cold light of day in the morning, so we'll see.

By that you mean you and about half a dozen others max

Yes it is - it was to be based on the original shirt - nowhere did they say it would be identical. Why is this so difficult for some to understand.

Don't often agree with Mopsey but for heavens sake if you don't like it don't buy it.

Had it been a 19th century copy exact in every way there would be another group bemoaning that. Sometimes I think that some people just want to moan at the club no matter what they do. Frankly IMO (and yes I'm as entitled to one as much as the moaners, something they never seem to recognise when it's coming the other way) it's a bit pathetic - just my opinion you understand.

Whats your problem, LG is only making a comment like one or two of us on here,

No complaints here, loving my sky blue away shirt, looks like a modern rugby shirt should, covered in sponsors (marketing dept doing their bit), it seems well made (better than last seasons), you can only get one head through the neck hole.
Massive improvement as far as I can see, and I will probably get the home one before the season starts.
A (big) step in the right direction.

Theyre advertising a shirt which isnt the one you get. Why is that so difficult to understand? Like i said all it took was them for to say on the advertisment that there may be changes.. Saves the dissapointment for alot of people. Some fans cant get to the shop so would have ordered a shirt they saw in the photo. Your right if people dont like it they dont have to get it and i guess some wont

That's exactly what I'm doing, so why is that a problem to you. There seems to be a willingness to criticise on here as if it's a right - which it is. Yet oddly those who retort and defend the club are not allowed the same right to reply - which they do have - how odd.

LG can say what he wants, I'm not stopping him or anyone else. However this is a forum in which all viewpoints are valid not just the ones that suit you. So basically if you don't want replies you don't like don't post. Or alternatively man up and refute my point of view with a solid and valid response, beat me and my grumpy posting with wit and guile. I'm listening.