That's 2 attempts so far - any more takers?!

Horrible when a jibe lands on stoney ground, must try harder (and possibly read the whole thread)

Posters on here.

[*]
Paulie is a by far better back rower than he is prop

I agree with you, where Belly gets these ideas (Fifita worst prop ever is one that springs to mind) I don't know but good luck changing his mind.

Christ read this thread in total and you’ll find out!

On second thought I’ll tell you - I don’t I thought he was a utility player but numerous posters on here and in the VT state he’s a prop.

Personally I’m none the wiser as it depends where you look - well have to wait and see I suppose.

Above is the guilty party where vastman 's got his imfo, looks pretty conclusive to me.HTH

When I've seen him play he plays prop.
When he has been shifted to back row he still pretty much plays the same position.
I have a friend who is a Warrington fan. He says he's a prop who can do a job if needed as a tackling second row.

We may decide to play him in the back row..... But his SL experience is prodomibently 'a middle defender'

That's worse than the several attempts at emphatically on this thread

One of the most pleasing typos I've ever seen; prodomibently should definitely be a word.

Defonumptily

That's prepossterus

Whatever Paulie is, the fact is he can play in the second row and he can play prop, so really we're in a very strong position.

He also breaks tackles and scores vital tries - to suggest he isn't comfortable in either position is plain daft imho - we are damn lucky to have him.

Note: Could work a little on his tackling technique though.