Fair call mate your lads let no-one down and with that commitment and effort when you are full strength you'll be even harder to beat.

Ok, i dont really want to start a who had worse injuries war/debate but halley came off after 40 mins,

But the replacements that leeds had to cover there injuries far outweigh in quality wise the replacements we had for our injuries, did you have a part-time tradesman making his debut. ?

Anyway onto the game, We gave another spirited display full of desire and will, 1st try leeds put a bomb / cross field kick to halley whilst under pressure he dropped it leeds scored (1 mistake 1 try).
We get a pen martin takes too from the subsequent drop out blaymire ran about 30 metre's to try catch ball he goes running towards it with his hand out and drops it they score (2 mistakes 2 try's), we had numerous efforts held up over the line several times, some poor kicks from martin near there line reduced our chances but a debateable forward pass in the 1st half against gleeson prevented a try for us.

We made several breaks MOST FROM DREW WHO WAS AGAIN FIRST CLASS, DICTATING PLAY, and forwards did well but got abit tired over the end, leeds made 1 break from the scrum end of first half, blanch made two by himself only to be ankle tapped twice.

I'm not going to complain too much about ganson but i know he's been improving his piggy backing technique,

Atkins came on looked fit , made hard yards made breaks and twwatted a leeds player, shame it wasnt mcguire but any of em will do

Towards the end bibey, wilkes and stosic were off (iirc) which affected go forward, btf we played quite an expansive game from US,

Everyone played well, blake did well although he was put on wing didnt do anything wrong, our young lads did well, grix improving again looking good, blaymire safe as houses bar 1 mistake (but couldnt do much else if im honest)

So dont get downbeat the effort spirit and desire was there and it is my firm belief that if obst had been on the park we would have won that game we had so many chances but couldnt get over the finishing line as it were,

Roll On Salford - were coming to get you

Is He A Part-Time Tradesman Because He Isn't Good Enough To Be A Full-Time Rugby League Player?...

Yes he is a part-time tradesman that has only had 1 week of training, Ok, what was his name, which posistion did he play and what did he do right and wrong?

I look forward to a reasoned comment not a blatant troll attemot

Luke Blake And What He Did Wrong Was He Turned Out In A Wakefield Trinity Wildcats Jersey...

u having a luagh or wat the lad did well when he came on didnt let anyone down just coz he part time dont mean he not up to doing his job as a rugby player. i thought the lad did well got stuck in on the defence.

was pleased with the lads tonight they put 100% in thats all we ask. we get some players back n play like that we should do ok.

You dont see myself making statements without even knowing where he played, how long he played , you havent got a clue now go back your'e getting nowt here

No He Can Leave That To The So Called "Professionals"...

You can ask for a reasoned comment till you're blue in the face but apart from the odd exception you won't get one.

Leeds Rhinos have attracted some real aris holes over the last few years and they reach a level of chavish obnoxiousness that I've rarely experienced in any other walk of life.

I enjoy watching Leeds, sometimes even when they're giving us a drubbing, I'm a staunch Yorkshireman and love to support our National team in whatever guise.

I'll be shouting for Manley in a couple of weeks time though and when the business end of the season comes round I'll probably be an honourary St.

how do these "so called proffesionals" become so they must of started from somewhere part time acad player before being offered full time contract etc

Your Just Bitter That Your Brothers Got The Talent Whereas Your Resigned To Posting On RL Forums...

Capital letters are used at the beginning of a sentence and for proper nouns, like names. I learnt that when I was eight. Now, what was your intelligent contribution again? Sorry, there wasn't one. It was just abuse.

Thanks for proving my point!

You are a prime example of the type of idiot I'm talking about.