Why is it different to signing a player half way through the season? Benefits both clubs and the player.

I suppose if Salford believe they will be nearer the bottom than the top of the league it could be in their interest that we beat Toulouse.

Ah got you

Must have missed us as he even turned up for training in his old Wakey gear!

I think the problem with Escare and it is something that has followed him most of, if not all of his career is his off field discipline.
He was a sensation when he first broke through at Catalans however he wasn't in with a great crowd off the pitch and his form suffered. Ultimately he had to leave France to get away from those influences when he moved to Wigan. Again he started well for Wigan but when he lost his place he started to revert back to a bit of carrying on off the field, refusing to train, refusing to play for the reserves which then saw him come to Wakefield.

He did well at Wakefield and showed he can cover the wings too, however after that spell he again finds himself as a back up player.

I think he is a cracking short term pick up whilst other players in the team recover but once we (hopefully) get our outside backs back on the field
I don't think he is needed and generally the longer he hangs around the more the issues seem to appear.

If he comes and does a job for a couple of weeks or even a month or 2 whilst we get lads back that will do for me and he can return to Salford.

Good signing for us although doesnt sound like rowley were too happy about the decision

Why didn’t we sign him for a month. Because after the two weeks it’s Salford at BV and you know if he plays for them he’ll have a stormer.

Not up to us.

Can't see the problem with loan signings so long as the same rules apply to all clubs. Something in which all clubs can benefit.

Seems like it was a board decision to allow him to come , to remove him from the wage bill . If this is the case they must be sailing close to the wind financially.