So when we lose our academy license some people can ghave no complaints can they playing other teams youngsters before our own

Another one in agreement with you.
How was Croft going to be used as cover for full back or hooker, JC going out on loan gives him what he needs ie game time in his position and (with no disrespect to either the player of his loan club) at a level that will be of benefit for his future career.

Wow, you really think that's why we would lose our license, you really that desperate to score points that you're willing to post that twaddle. Tragic

If you had ant i=real understanding of the game then you'd realise the only reason we would lose our license is our lack of facilities, That is being addressed, Wat happens with Bowes is ridiculously irrelevant

Score points wtf you on about.as for posting twaddle just be following you in that respect..and why wouldnt taking other teams youngsters work against us one of our reasons and academy selling points is the players who made the step up but then we loan 2 other teams youngster's opposing to play our own...so what is the point of us having an academy i hear the people making these decisions ask...

As for croft good hes getting game time although i think hes better than any of the 2 wingers playing so pity he aint a winger

This lad will of been learning off the best hooker England have ever produced, works well both ways. People have been screaming about needing a hooker instead of using crowther, but if we’d of signed a washed up NRL hooker not much will of been said. I’m all for blasting our recent performances and lame attack, but not this, if the lad might not make it long term at St’s (23) smith in front of him then there could be something further in it for us as Kyle wood isn’t exactly a spring chicken.

Don't know what is wrong with some posters....
Club is dammed if they do and dammed if they don't......

Can you identify these other teams youngsters we have signed? I thought we had signed 2 x 23 year olds on short term loans to cover positions we are desperately short in.

As for Croft you said yourself he isn’t a winger. We have 3/4 other centre options presently in the team. He will benefit by playing games.

Also I would say it’s a positive for the Academy that our young players are sent on loan to championship clubs. Certainly shows that our academy is a source of the championships player supply.

The only thing that matters is if he his better than what we’ve got, if he is then fine, we need to win some games and fast

Josh will probably get a total of 40 mins playing time during his 2 week stay. I think that's what people find baffling.
Woods in the squad for Fridays game so it's fair to assume that Josh will be on the bench.

What's baffling about it, as Mopsey says so long as they are quality minutes who cares.

Also, do you think this is the time to bring a 19-year old into the team, I don't.

I've seen too many 19-year-olds who come in and struggle only to be most heavily abused by those who demanded they get picked and their careers ruined.

We need a win, no time for dogma.

He’s hardly a youngster either. Just the same as taking a 29 year old on. We need a good hooker. If he does the job for us then I’m more than happy

Firstly good luck to Josh, welcome on board, 3 pages in and that's not been said. It reminds me of when Ryan Atkins signed from Bradford and was first rolled out in front of pretty much an angry mob by Steve Ferres! (I think it was)

I think if we had some points on the board then we might have seen Bowes getting the gig but as stated we are desperate for a win.

First of all i said its good croft getting some game time i personally would play him on wing ahead of any winger bar in johnstone but that the round hole square pegs thing again.

Youngsters yes cos 23 year olds are that esp as they have limited first team experience as these have.now if jowitt is out i get the bolt one as we have no orher full back but why do we have 2 players who cant get no way near the hudds team .what i dont get is a hooker on a 2 week loan of which we only have 1 game anyway.why not give our home bread bowes a shot he did well last year if a 17/18 year old prop is worth a place in squad im sure that bowes is.and regards the academy licence if i was one of the people deciding who where getting these im sure seeing us loan youngsters with very limited first team experience for 2 weeks i would be asking why not there own academy

Nether the less the lads are here and while there in a trinity shirt they get my ful support

If we don't introduce our own youngsters how can we evaluate them. We are talking about 40 mins max to give our own guys a fun out.
Josh bee on loan at Whitehaven and more recently Leigh
Hookers a difficult position to cover so let's hope he can show up in the 40 mins he will be allocated.
For me give our own a 40 spell.

As I say let's wait and see.

If we accept that the coaching staff has a better idea of when a player is ready and what players we need at the moment than we do then they must know what they are doing.

We pay them to do this, they will have their reasons and if they are wrong we will soon find out.