You're not really sorry are you, you're just trolling.

As i said i knew it would be unpopular, but is it better to be unpopular and make a point that i think needs making or just stick your head in the sand and say yes that's great now we've got em on the ropes and keep the forum police aka vastman happy.
I know which i think is best.

Well I think it's more of a case the club have been trying to force the council to actually enforce the planning conditions and trying to stress to people that that is what we're mostly interested in rather than getting money from them. Then the council have come out this week and said that the offer of £2 million is still on the table, which we'd have to be completely stupid to turn down. The most important thing though still remains them enforcing the planning conditions, otherwise the £2 million is completely useless.

I don't know, if the trust the club and the council had all been in talks as trb continually tells us they have been then surely everyone knew that the funding was still on the table.

I am not a WT fan and even I can answer that for you.

Mr Carter and WT are not asking for any money from the council, the Trust is asking for money to build a community stadium. You realise they are 2 separate things?

Yep, whatever - nice that you've made a SUDDEN appearance spouting what is obviously factually wrong so please forgive me if I don'y buy the coy style of your posts.

I think people are making too much of what Michael Carter said. The council said they'd give us the £2 million years ago, and have said they're happy to still give it so I don't really see the issue unless you're just looking to push an anti-Wakefield agenda like Tigertroll. The main thing we want is them to actually enforce their planning laws. I reckon if the council said right, we'll draft a multi-party agreement that says Newcold does contribute to the trigger point but you have to find the other £2 million somewhere else then the trust would probably agree because actually enforcing the planning conditions is infinitely more important.

Which part do you see as been factually wrong, also i didn't realise there was a time limit required on the forum to make you "not a troll" but as i said before i am not too bothered about upsetting the forum police.

You should be getting ready for tonights match
Up the Trin

I suppose it's factually wrong saying the club are asking for money when the £2 million would actually be spent on a stadium owned by the trust rather than club.

Is Sir Rodney still forming his 4 man trust? And who was supposedly in the 4 man trust. May the best trust win.
Up the Trin
Love this Club
Love this City

Trust Wars

Excellent, well constructed response Sandal. Do the WE have a copy for publication?

Excellent response Sandal Cat.

Not sure if this has already been put on here or on another thread but Andrea jenkyns MP for stanley is running a campaign for a public meeting with all parties concerned. Well worth signing her campaign petition IMO www.andreajenkyns.co.uk Under campaigns

Not sure if this has already been put on here or on another thread but Andrea jenkyns MP for stanley is running a campaign for a public meeting with all parties concerned. Well worth signing her campaign petition IMO www.andreajenkyns.co.uk Under campaigns