| FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Arona & Walton |
 |
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 487 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Dec 2005 | 19 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Aug 2017 | Jun 2017 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
19447_1387125086.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_19447.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 5086 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| May 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2022 | Nov 2022 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
14911_1666773367.jpg
[b:3diuzizv][color=#0000FF:3diuzizv]WAKEFIELD[/color:3diuzizv] [color=#FF0000:3diuzizv]TRINITY[/color:3diuzizv] - [color=#FF0000:3diuzizv]The[/color:3diuzizv] [color=#0000FF:3diuzizv]PRIDE[/color:3diuzizv] [color=#FF0000:3diuzizv]of[/color:3diuzizv] [color=#0000FF:3diuzizv]Sporting[/color:3diuzizv] [color=#FF0000:3diuzizv]Wakefield[/color:3diuzizv][/b:3diuzizv]
[b:3diuzizv][color=#FF0000:3diuzizv]THE DEFINITION OF INSANITY IS DOING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND EXPECTING DIFFERENT RESULTS[/color:3diuzizv][/b:3diuzizv]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_14911.jpg |
|
|
SUMMARY OF CM'S SUBMISSIONS ON THE APPROPRIATE SANCTION
Accepted this was not a deliberate act to injure opponent. The opponent breaks tackle, [sizethe player make tackle with both feet off the ground in a jumping motion[/size. At this point the player is not in control of his own body weight. This technique has an unacceptable risk of injury. This was a careless action and almost reckless, the player has responsibility for the safety of the tackled player and must be held accountable. On this occasion the player failed to reach the standard of care required.
- See more at: www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/dis ... vNQEe.dpuf
Well, I've watched it loads of times now and I just don't see this at all. Anybody else? |
|
SUMMARY OF CM'S SUBMISSIONS ON THE APPROPRIATE SANCTION
Accepted this was not a deliberate act to injure opponent. The opponent breaks tackle, [sizethe player make tackle with both feet off the ground in a jumping motion[/size. At this point the player is not in control of his own body weight. This technique has an unacceptable risk of injury. This was a careless action and almost reckless, the player has responsibility for the safety of the tackled player and must be held accountable. On this occasion the player failed to reach the standard of care required.
- See more at: www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/dis ... vNQEe.dpuf
Well, I've watched it loads of times now and I just don't see this at all. Anybody else? | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 5077 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Mar 2014 | 11 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
72289_1398805144.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_72289.jpg |
|
|
I have got to say this is a ridiculous ruling and even the disciplinary panals own reasoning makes no sense whatsoever. If we are to take the panels reasoning and apply it to all defensive techniques we'd have to recoach every player about how to make certain types of tackle, eg tackling from behind.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 6993 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
Top six 2005 - Trinity.: |
|
|
So any tackle that players have to stretch or dive into (like when chasing back) is a potential ban?
So next time Johnstone makes a break I don't expect any player to make a last ditch tackle unless they know they will have full control of body weight. I demand a ban.
What a load of balls. If that were the case there'd be 5 sin bins or sending offs a game.
Dissapointing, if a player is half breaking a tackle and you can get to him at a stretch or with a dive don't bother. Just let them stride through the line or you'll get banned. This is a big cop out
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Coach | 7423 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| May 2005 | 20 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
14916_1445291540.jpeg
Twitter...@GINGERWILDCAT:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_14916.jpeg |
|
| Quote: Trojan Horse "So any tackle that players have to stretch or dive into (like when chasing back) is a potential ban?
So next time Johnstone makes a break I don't expect any player to make a last ditch tackle unless they know they will have full control of body weight. I demand a ban.
What a load of balls. If that were the case there'd be 5 sin bins or sending offs a game.
Dissapointing, if a player is half breaking a tackle and you can get to him at a stretch or with a dive don't bother. Just let them stride through the line or you'll get banned. This is a big cop out'"
Or have their feet off the ground!
It looks to me that they couldn't really find a particular rule to justify a ban.
Just watched it again and I just don't see anything malicious or illegal.
They've got it in for us I tell ya. |
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Club Captain | 910 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Aug 2015 | 9 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
74356_1721602612.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_74356.jpg |
|
| Quote: JINJER "Or have their feet off the ground!
It looks to me that they couldn't really find a particular rule to justify a ban.
Just watched it again and I just don't see anything malicious or illegal.
They've got it in for us I tell ya.'"
got to agree with you, it'll be touch and pass soon. R.L. going down the pan  |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Board Member | 4961 |  |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2002 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2024 | Feb 2024 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
2334_1318529805.png
There's Only One F in Wakefield:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_2334.png |
|
|
I suspect that they are trying to mitigate the unusually high numbers of injuries that SL is experiencing at the moment by punishing tackles that cause injury, rather than that are dangerous.
If it's the case then 10/10 for trying to address the issue, but 0/10 for execution.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| Player Coach | 15521 | |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
50722_1319672516.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50722.jpg |
|
|
It's insane to use the injury as a basis for punishment - RL is a high-impact, high-speed collision sport, so there is always the possibility for a freak injury to occur; as we've seen in the opening rounds this year. Arona's tackle was the definition of innocuous - if there's no injury, there's no way the ref even considers blowing up for that, nor do the match review panel give it a second thought.
If there is an attempt to deal with dangerous contact, there are better places to concentrate - 4 man gang tackles and attacks to the standing leg would be a good start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
