FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
  
FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > The City of Wakefield Community Stadium
736 posts in 50 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach5778
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
46978_1481681744.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_46978.jpg



Quote: chissitt "We could and should have been in the Pugney's area of Denby Dale road years' ago if it had not been for the action's of one man.'"


I remember the idea being banded around. along with YCCC proposed move down to the Denby Dale area. At the time I wasn't around Wakey so don't really know what happened.Care to expand mate?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach6297
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200718 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
31007_1580947500.jpg
EVENTUALLY, WE'LL WIN SOMETHING, ,MAYBE, IF I'M STILL ALIVE THEN:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_31007.jpg



From the outside looking in, it is hard not to feel that there has been a huge con-job on the rugby fans of Wakefield, and on the general public. The permission granted was obtained on the provision of a community sports stadium with the city's only professional sports team as the major tenant. For the stadium not to be built looks like a massive con-job. "Thanks for the permission. Now do one!"

I know other factors are involved that change things, but surely the position should be that if there is no stadium, the development ends. If the community stadium is provided at Belle Vue (my preference anyway), I can see how it can be justified, but with no sign of movement on that front it seems like the con-job is almost complete.

The frustrating thing is that there is no lack of will. People (and we know who they are) have put countless hours of their own time into this, and I don't know how they do it.

The answer seems simple enough: are the funds there or not to develop Belle Vue properly? If not, the permission for Newmarket should be withdrawn immediately. You never know, it might then suddenly appear. The community stadium envisaged wasn't a couple of training pitches, and the public inquiry didn't look at that meagre option.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2107No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2018Jun 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



It's frustrating when you see lower and non league football teams knocking stadiums up for fun. Look at fc United of Manchester playing in the league Wakefield FC were the other year and only formed a few years ago and they've managed to build a new stadium. One thing to be said the momentum to get a ground in Wakefield is gathering pace the way York court have shafted us has got people wanting stadium sorted. Let's do this.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11580
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Sep 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: Shifty Cat "I remember the idea being banded around. along with YCCC proposed move down to the Denby Dale area. At the time I wasn't around Wakey so don't really know what happened.Care to expand mate?'"


See PM.

RankPostsTeam
International Star17980
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
simpsons/simp006.gif
:simpsons/simp006.gif



Quote: Slugger McBatt "From the outside looking in, it is hard not to feel that there has been a huge con-job on the rugby fans of Wakefield, and on the general public. The permission granted was obtained on the provision of a community sports stadium with the city's only professional sports team as the major tenant. For the stadium not to be built looks like a massive con-job. "Thanks for the permission. Now do one!"

I know other factors are involved that change things, but surely the position should be that if there is no stadium, the development ends. If the community stadium is provided at Belle Vue (my preference anyway), I can see how it can be justified, but with no sign of movement on that front it seems like the con-job is almost complete.

The frustrating thing is that there is no lack of will. People (and we know who they are) have put countless hours of their own time into this, and I don't know how they do it.

The answer seems simple enough

This is pretty much how I see it.
It would be really interesting, although probably not helpful, to find out exactly who was involved at the outset and to see exactly who the winners and losers are out of the "deal".
If the community stadium is not forthcoming, then who's pockets are lined with gold ?

The whole planning permission and change of designation of land appeared to be changed to allow a new stadium, plus the industrial stuff, surely the SoS should be looking into the situation.

TRB
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach10926
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Dec 2021Feb 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
15993_1515231183.jpeg
[color=#400000:2dasnjxb]"Wakefields Sporting Crusader"[/color:2dasnjxb] [b:2dasnjxb][color=#FF0000:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Stadium for Wakefield campaign, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://www.swag-online.co.uk[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb] [b:2dasnjxb][color=#0000FF:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Supporters Trust, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://wakefield.rlfans.com[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_15993.jpeg



Whilst it is well known now that the 106 doesn't work as intended, we do not consider it value-less.

The inspectors report is very clear and unambiguous about why PP was granted and what he expected to occur, the 106 agreement doesn't deliver that, but the intention was clear.

We are looking into every avenue to ensure that we know who to hit and what with.

I don't hold it against anyone who has lost all will over this matter - as Slugger says, there is a massive injustice which has occurred - but we can't afford to give up on this - our only chance to achieve something significant (be it NM or BV) - whilst ever there is the faintest pulse in the body of this deal.

I don't think it will be long now before we will be in a position to provide more details about what is going on in the background.

Really sorry that we cant say more at this point.

RankPostsTeam
International Star974No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2015Aug 2015LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: TRB "Whilst it is well known now that the 106 doesn't work as intended, we do not consider it value-less.

The inspectors report is very clear and unambiguous about why PP was granted and what he expected to occur, the 106 agreement doesn't deliver that, but the intention was clear.

We are looking into every avenue to ensure that we know who to hit and what with.

I don't hold it against anyone who has lost all will over this matter - as Slugger says, there is a massive injustice which has occurred - but we can't afford to give up on this - our only chance to achieve something significant (be it NM or BV) - whilst ever there is the faintest pulse in the body of this deal.

I don't think it will be long now before we will be in a position to provide more details about what is going on in the background.

Really sorry that we cant say more at this point.'"


Whilst it's infuriating as a lifelong supporter of 50+ years, to see the ground situation not resolved after all these years, I know it's not for the lack of effort on the part of you and others closely concerned in the ground effort.

I only hope that if we end up with nothing those unscrupulous individuals responsible are named and shamed

RankPostsTeam
International Star483No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2017Nov 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: TRB "Whilst it is well known now that the 106 doesn't work as intended, we do not consider it value-less.

The inspectors report is very clear and unambiguous about why PP was granted and what he expected to occur, the 106 agreement doesn't deliver that, but the intention was clear.

We are looking into every avenue to ensure that we know who to hit and what with.

I don't hold it against anyone who has lost all will over this matter - as Slugger says, there is a massive injustice which has occurred - but we can't afford to give up on this - our only chance to achieve something significant (be it NM or BV) - whilst ever there is the faintest pulse in the body of this deal.

I don't think it will be long now before we will be in a position to provide more details about what is going on in the background.

Really sorry that we cant say more at this point.'"

If the 106 isn't legally binding, which it appears not, the options available are limited without the will of the developer to 'do the right thing'. It would seem that in this case Yorkcourt can't or won't do that. The political will of the council would be of great benefit but that also seems to be sadly lacking also in this case, it would appear they have washed their hands of the issue. The local MP's may well pay it lip service but most are as much actual use as a chocolate fireguard and given there was oppostion to the scheme as well it will be a sensitive issue around general election time, especially given the cuts that have taken place since that 15K petition in favour was gained. So it would seem the main option would the entire development going to a judicial review which could in theory either force the re-writing of the S106, at which point the developer could pull out if they felt the need, or the overturning the entire ruling. The obvious downside to that obviously is that there will still be no stadium or requirement for the community facilities and these things are potentially not cheap. Who would fund it? Maybe the threat of this would bring YCP to the table with a genuine offer, probably involving Belle Vue, to remedy the situation and stop the whole development and, more importantly to them, their payday going down the pan.

What I can't see is it being anything other than a re-developed Belle Vue now though. I would imagine for YCP to have anything like the funds to build a stadium and still walk away with a worthwhile (to them) profit for their efforts they would like some of the land designated for the stadium at Newmarket leaving just a token gesture of maybe a couple of 3G pitches there. Question is will their offer (if it ever were to happen and I have my serious doubts on that) be enough to buy back BV AND the surrounding land AND pay for a major revamp of the stadium, which lets be honest is necessary? Again I have my doubts and they will use every trick in the book to get away with paying as little as possible if anything at all.

I have nothing but respect to those fighting this and I really hope you can somehow garner something that benefits the club and the community out of all this but it is really all now down to where YCP will play ball and the threats that will have to be made work. If they don't it could take quite a while to sort out and get very messy.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach3190
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
14887_1622315122.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_14887.jpg



Quote: Slugger McBatt "From the outside looking in, it is hard not to feel that there has been a huge con-job on the rugby fans of Wakefield, and on the general public. The permission granted was obtained on the provision of a community sports stadium with the city's only professional sports team as the major tenant. For the stadium not to be built looks like a massive con-job. "Thanks for the permission. Now do one!"

I know other factors are involved that change things, but surely the position should be that if there is no stadium, the development ends. If the community stadium is provided at Belle Vue (my preference anyway), I can see how it can be justified, but with no sign of movement on that front it seems like the con-job is almost complete.

The frustrating thing is that there is no lack of will. People (and we know who they are) have put countless hours of their own time into this, and I don't know how they do it.

The answer seems simple enough
It would make a good Book

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach7423
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
14916_1445291540.jpeg
Twitter...@GINGERWILDCAT:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_14916.jpeg



Quote: djcool "It would make a good Book'"

Don't say that, at the speed he's churning them out he'll have one on the shelves in Asda by bonfire night

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4259
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2020Feb 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
33791.jpg
[b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable ...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo] [quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish> IA mode off. :wink:[/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg



Quote: TRB "Whilst it is well known now that the 106 doesn't work as intended, we do not consider it value-less.

The inspectors report is very clear and unambiguous about why PP was granted and what he expected to occur, the 106 agreement doesn't deliver that, but the intention was clear.

We are looking into every avenue to ensure that we know who to hit and what with.

I don't hold it against anyone who has lost all will over this matter - as Slugger says, there is a massive injustice which has occurred - but we can't afford to give up on this - our only chance to achieve something significant (be it NM or BV) - whilst ever there is the faintest pulse in the body of this deal.

I don't think it will be long now before we will be in a position to provide more details about what is going on in the background.

Really sorry that we cant say more at this point.'"


What my mate TRB said...

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4259
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2020Feb 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
33791.jpg
[b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable ...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo] [quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish> IA mode off. :wink:[/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg



Quote: Slugger McBatt "From the outside looking in, it is hard not to feel that there has been a huge con-job on the rugby fans of Wakefield, and on the general public. The permission granted was obtained on the provision of a community sports stadium with the city's only professional sports team as the major tenant. For the stadium not to be built looks like a massive con-job. "Thanks for the permission. Now do one!"

I know other factors are involved that change things, but surely the position should be that if there is no stadium, the development ends. If the community stadium is provided at Belle Vue (my preference anyway), I can see how it can be justified, but with no sign of movement on that front it seems like the con-job is almost complete.

The frustrating thing is that there is no lack of will. People (and we know who they are) have put countless hours of their own time into this, and I don't know how they do it.

The answer seems simple enough

This is a great post and the only answer I can give is that while I can see exactly why it might look and seem simple, it really isn't! In fact, as we have worked harder over the last few months, it has got slightly more complex and not less... however, following a lengthy and very positive meeting this week (and we have had at least one meeting or another every week for the last couple of months, sometimes two or three) then we are working out the best path to bring about the best possible resolution we can. And, we still believe that could be a new stadium at Newmarket or alternatively a substantially redeveloped Belle Vue.

As Phil says, we can't say any more at the moment, and we hope everyone understands that we can't purely because it could (and probably would) impact on the best possible deal we want to achieve. When we can tell you we will and equally, we might need help... and the timing could be everything!

Keep the faith people, the small group of people closely involved with this alongside TRB, MC, CB and I are spending a good chunck of time, on a weekly basis at the moment, trying to make this happen. BTW, I don't want your praise for this, I am doing this for lots of reasons and praise is not one of them, but I just want everyone to understand that we are all doing this because we believe we can do it... and if we don't, then we will be content within ourselves that we did everything it was possible to do!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4259
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2020Feb 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
33791.jpg
[b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable ...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo] [quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish> IA mode off. :wink:[/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg



Quote: sixtogo "If the 106 isn't legally binding, which it appears not, the options available are limited without the will of the developer to 'do the right thing'. It would seem that in this case Yorkcourt can't or won't do that. The political will of the council would be of great benefit but that also seems to be sadly lacking also in this case, it would appear they have washed their hands of the issue. The local MP's may well pay it lip service but most are as much actual use as a chocolate fireguard and given there was oppostion to the scheme as well it will be a sensitive issue around general election time, especially given the cuts that have taken place since that 15K petition in favour was gained. So it would seem the main option would the entire development going to a judicial review which could in theory either force the re-writing of the S106, at which point the developer could pull out if they felt the need, or the overturning the entire ruling. The obvious downside to that obviously is that there will still be no stadium or requirement for the community facilities and these things are potentially not cheap. Who would fund it? Maybe the threat of this would bring YCP to the table with a genuine offer, probably involving Belle Vue, to remedy the situation and stop the whole development and, more importantly to them, their payday going down the pan.

What I can't see is it being anything other than a re-developed Belle Vue now though. I would imagine for YCP to have anything like the funds to build a stadium and still walk away with a worthwhile (to them) profit for their efforts they would like some of the land designated for the stadium at Newmarket leaving just a token gesture of maybe a couple of 3G pitches there. Question is will their offer (if it ever were to happen and I have my serious doubts on that) be enough to buy back BV AND the surrounding land AND pay for a major revamp of the stadium, which lets be honest is necessary? Again I have my doubts and they will use every trick in the book to get away with paying as little as possible if anything at all.

I have nothing but respect to those fighting this and I really hope you can somehow garner something that benefits the club and the community out of all this but it is really all now down to where YCP will play ball and the threats that will have to be made work. If they don't it could take quite a while to sort out and get very messy.'"


This is a great post too BTW...

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2107No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2018Jun 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



It good to hear that our corner is still being fought, we will do this.

RankPostsTeam
International Board Member4927
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200322 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
3634.jpg
[IMG]//i50.tinypic.com/a59ff5.gif[/IMG]:3634.jpg



Quote: chissitt "We could and should have been in the Pugney's area of Denby Dale road years' ago if it had not been for the action's of one man.'"


Think you maybe mixed up re Pugney's when the Asda was originally built there was an opportunity for a new ground there as Asda wanted the ground as a site for the supermarket. It was reheated at the time by the council I believe. Then thee was the issue of Yorkshire leaving Heading let and a new ground in Wakefield just off Junction 39 Yorkshire decided to stay and develop the HQ at Headingley.
Following that we had the bluster if a stadium at Sharlston on the pit site. We had Queens Drive on of these opting resulting in McAlpines building the toilets and putting barriers in at BV.

Moving on it was Thorne Park and a possible at some point with Ossett Town rejected by Town. Then Newmarket.

So in 30 or 35 years nothing has changed it looks like a distant dream to me

736 posts in 50 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing
736 posts in 50 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


3.73046875:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
22m
Planning for next season
Leyther in n
178
Recent
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
Recent
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40732
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Pre Season - 2025
mwindass
183
1m
Planning for next season
Leyther in n
178
2m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63221
2m
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
2m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
MadDogg
4018
2m
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
2m
TV Games - Not Hull
UllFC
3080
2m
Rumours and signings v9
NickyKiss
28895
2m
Leeds away first up
Butcher
41
2m
Film game
karetaker
5639
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
2024
Butcher
5
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
Butcher
5
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
ColD
2
TODAY
Catalan Away
jonh
5
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
rubber ducki
12
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
Butcher
41
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
TODAY
Noah Booth out on loan
Butcher
20
TODAY
Luke Gale testimonial match
BarnsleyGull
2
TODAY
England 5 - 0 Ireland
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To Newcastle
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
480
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
533
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1275
England's Women Demolish The W..
1095
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1340
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
1130
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1397
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1930
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2148
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2387
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1960
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2197
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2661
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
2093
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
2165
POSTSONLINEREGISTRATIONSRECORD
19.65M 1,690 80,15514,103
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
 Thu 13th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Wigan
v
Leigh
 Fri 14th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
20:00
Hull KR
v
Castleford
20:00
Catalans
v
Hull FC
 Sat 15th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Leeds
v
Wakefield
17:30
St.Helens
v
Salford
 Sun 16th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R1
15:00
Huddersfield
v
Warrington
 Thu 20th Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Wakefield
v
Hull KR
 Fri 21st Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
20:00
Warrington
v
Catalans
20:00
Hull FC
v
Wigan
 Sat 22nd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
15:00
Salford
v
Leeds
20:00
Castleford
v
St.Helens
 Sun 23rd Feb 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R2
14:30
Leigh
v
Huddersfield
 Thu 6th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
20:00
Hull FC
v
Leigh
 Fri 7th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
20:00
Castleford
v
Salford
20:00
St.Helens
v
Hull KR
 Sat 8th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
17:30
Catalans
v
Leeds
 Sun 9th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R3
17:30
Warrington
v
Wakefield
17:30
Wigan
v
Huddersfield
 Thu 20th Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R4
20:00
Salford
v
Huddersfield
 Fri 21st Mar 2025
     Mens Super League XXX-R4
20:00
St.Helens
v
Warrington
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)
Matches on TV
Thu 13th Feb
SL
20:00
Wigan-Leigh
Fri 14th Feb
SL
20:00
Hull KR-Castleford
SL
20:00
Catalans-Hull FC
Sat 15th Feb
SL
15:00
Leeds-Wakefield
SL
17:30
St.Helens-Salford
Sun 16th Feb
SL
15:00
Huddersfield-Warrington
Thu 20th Feb
SL
20:00
Wakefield-Hull KR
Fri 21st Feb
SL
20:00
Warrington-Catalans
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Wigan
Sat 22nd Feb
SL
15:00
Salford-Leeds
SL
20:00
Castleford-St.Helens
Sun 23rd Feb
SL
14:30
Leigh-Huddersfield
Thu 6th Mar
SL
20:00
Hull FC-Leigh
Fri 7th Mar
SL
20:00
Castleford-Salford
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Hull KR
Sat 8th Mar
SL
17:30
Catalans-Leeds
Sun 9th Mar
SL
17:30
Warrington-Wakefield
SL
17:30
Wigan-Huddersfield
Thu 20th Mar
SL
20:00
Salford-Huddersfield
Fri 21st Mar
SL
20:00
St.Helens-Warrington
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
22m
Planning for next season
Leyther in n
178
Recent
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
Recent
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40732
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Pre Season - 2025
mwindass
183
1m
Planning for next season
Leyther in n
178
2m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63221
2m
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
2m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
MadDogg
4018
2m
Shopping list for 2025
Cokey
5577
2m
TV Games - Not Hull
UllFC
3080
2m
Rumours and signings v9
NickyKiss
28895
2m
Leeds away first up
Butcher
41
2m
Film game
karetaker
5639
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
2024
Butcher
5
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
Butcher
5
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
ColD
2
TODAY
Catalan Away
jonh
5
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
rubber ducki
12
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
Butcher
41
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Assistant Coach - Langley
exiledrhino
30
TODAY
Noah Booth out on loan
Butcher
20
TODAY
Luke Gale testimonial match
BarnsleyGull
2
TODAY
England 5 - 0 Ireland
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To Newcastle
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
480
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
533
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1275
England's Women Demolish The W..
1095
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1340
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
1130
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1397
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1930
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2148
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2387
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1960
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2197
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2661
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
2093
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
2165


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!