FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > The City of Wakefield Community Stadium |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5778 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
46978_1481681744.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_46978.jpg |
|
| Quote: chissitt "We could and should have been in the Pugney's area of Denby Dale road years' ago if it had not been for the action's of one man.'"
I remember the idea being banded around. along with YCCC proposed move down to the Denby Dale area. At the time I wasn't around Wakey so don't really know what happened.Care to expand mate?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6297 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
31007_1580947500.jpg EVENTUALLY, WE'LL WIN SOMETHING, ,MAYBE, IF I'M STILL ALIVE THEN:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_31007.jpg |
|
| From the outside looking in, it is hard not to feel that there has been a huge con-job on the rugby fans of Wakefield, and on the general public. The permission granted was obtained on the provision of a community sports stadium with the city's only professional sports team as the major tenant. For the stadium not to be built looks like a massive con-job. "Thanks for the permission. Now do one!"
I know other factors are involved that change things, but surely the position should be that if there is no stadium, the development ends. If the community stadium is provided at Belle Vue (my preference anyway), I can see how it can be justified, but with no sign of movement on that front it seems like the con-job is almost complete.
The frustrating thing is that there is no lack of will. People (and we know who they are) have put countless hours of their own time into this, and I don't know how they do it.
The answer seems simple enough: are the funds there or not to develop Belle Vue properly? If not, the permission for Newmarket should be withdrawn immediately. You never know, it might then suddenly appear. The community stadium envisaged wasn't a couple of training pitches, and the public inquiry didn't look at that meagre option.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2107 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| It's frustrating when you see lower and non league football teams knocking stadiums up for fun. Look at fc United of Manchester playing in the league Wakefield FC were the other year and only formed a few years ago and they've managed to build a new stadium. One thing to be said the momentum to get a ground in Wakefield is gathering pace the way York court have shafted us has got people wanting stadium sorted. Let's do this.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 11580 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Sep 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Shifty Cat "I remember the idea being banded around. along with YCCC proposed move down to the Denby Dale area. At the time I wasn't around Wakey so don't really know what happened.Care to expand mate?'"
See PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 17980 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
simpsons/simp006.gif :simpsons/simp006.gif |
|
| Quote: Slugger McBatt "From the outside looking in, it is hard not to feel that there has been a huge con-job on the rugby fans of Wakefield, and on the general public. The permission granted was obtained on the provision of a community sports stadium with the city's only professional sports team as the major tenant. For the stadium not to be built looks like a massive con-job. "Thanks for the permission. Now do one!"
I know other factors are involved that change things, but surely the position should be that if there is no stadium, the development ends. If the community stadium is provided at Belle Vue (my preference anyway), I can see how it can be justified, but with no sign of movement on that front it seems like the con-job is almost complete.
The frustrating thing is that there is no lack of will. People (and we know who they are) have put countless hours of their own time into this, and I don't know how they do it.
The answer seems simple enough
This is pretty much how I see it.
It would be really interesting, although probably not helpful, to find out exactly who was involved at the outset and to see exactly who the winners and losers are out of the "deal".
If the community stadium is not forthcoming, then who's pockets are lined with gold ?
The whole planning permission and change of designation of land appeared to be changed to allow a new stadium, plus the industrial stuff, surely the SoS should be looking into the situation.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 10926 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
15993_1515231183.jpeg [color=#400000:2dasnjxb]"Wakefields Sporting Crusader"[/color:2dasnjxb]
[b:2dasnjxb][color=#FF0000:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Stadium for Wakefield campaign, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://www.swag-online.co.uk[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb]
[b:2dasnjxb][color=#0000FF:2dasnjxb]For the latest details on the Supporters Trust, log onto [url:2dasnjxb]http://wakefield.rlfans.com[/url:2dasnjxb][/color:2dasnjxb][/b:2dasnjxb]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_15993.jpeg |
|
| Whilst it is well known now that the 106 doesn't work as intended, we do not consider it value-less.
The inspectors report is very clear and unambiguous about why PP was granted and what he expected to occur, the 106 agreement doesn't deliver that, but the intention was clear.
We are looking into every avenue to ensure that we know who to hit and what with.
I don't hold it against anyone who has lost all will over this matter - as Slugger says, there is a massive injustice which has occurred - but we can't afford to give up on this - our only chance to achieve something significant (be it NM or BV) - whilst ever there is the faintest pulse in the body of this deal.
I don't think it will be long now before we will be in a position to provide more details about what is going on in the background.
Really sorry that we cant say more at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 974 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2015 | Aug 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: TRB "Whilst it is well known now that the 106 doesn't work as intended, we do not consider it value-less.
The inspectors report is very clear and unambiguous about why PP was granted and what he expected to occur, the 106 agreement doesn't deliver that, but the intention was clear.
We are looking into every avenue to ensure that we know who to hit and what with.
I don't hold it against anyone who has lost all will over this matter - as Slugger says, there is a massive injustice which has occurred - but we can't afford to give up on this - our only chance to achieve something significant (be it NM or BV) - whilst ever there is the faintest pulse in the body of this deal.
I don't think it will be long now before we will be in a position to provide more details about what is going on in the background.
Really sorry that we cant say more at this point.'"
Whilst it's infuriating as a lifelong supporter of 50+ years, to see the ground situation not resolved after all these years, I know it's not for the lack of effort on the part of you and others closely concerned in the ground effort.
I only hope that if we end up with nothing those unscrupulous individuals responsible are named and shamed
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 483 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Nov 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: TRB "Whilst it is well known now that the 106 doesn't work as intended, we do not consider it value-less.
The inspectors report is very clear and unambiguous about why PP was granted and what he expected to occur, the 106 agreement doesn't deliver that, but the intention was clear.
We are looking into every avenue to ensure that we know who to hit and what with.
I don't hold it against anyone who has lost all will over this matter - as Slugger says, there is a massive injustice which has occurred - but we can't afford to give up on this - our only chance to achieve something significant (be it NM or BV) - whilst ever there is the faintest pulse in the body of this deal.
I don't think it will be long now before we will be in a position to provide more details about what is going on in the background.
Really sorry that we cant say more at this point.'"
If the 106 isn't legally binding, which it appears not, the options available are limited without the will of the developer to 'do the right thing'. It would seem that in this case Yorkcourt can't or won't do that. The political will of the council would be of great benefit but that also seems to be sadly lacking also in this case, it would appear they have washed their hands of the issue. The local MP's may well pay it lip service but most are as much actual use as a chocolate fireguard and given there was oppostion to the scheme as well it will be a sensitive issue around general election time, especially given the cuts that have taken place since that 15K petition in favour was gained. So it would seem the main option would the entire development going to a judicial review which could in theory either force the re-writing of the S106, at which point the developer could pull out if they felt the need, or the overturning the entire ruling. The obvious downside to that obviously is that there will still be no stadium or requirement for the community facilities and these things are potentially not cheap. Who would fund it? Maybe the threat of this would bring YCP to the table with a genuine offer, probably involving Belle Vue, to remedy the situation and stop the whole development and, more importantly to them, their payday going down the pan.
What I can't see is it being anything other than a re-developed Belle Vue now though. I would imagine for YCP to have anything like the funds to build a stadium and still walk away with a worthwhile (to them) profit for their efforts they would like some of the land designated for the stadium at Newmarket leaving just a token gesture of maybe a couple of 3G pitches there. Question is will their offer (if it ever were to happen and I have my serious doubts on that) be enough to buy back BV AND the surrounding land AND pay for a major revamp of the stadium, which lets be honest is necessary? Again I have my doubts and they will use every trick in the book to get away with paying as little as possible if anything at all.
I have nothing but respect to those fighting this and I really hope you can somehow garner something that benefits the club and the community out of all this but it is really all now down to where YCP will play ball and the threats that will have to be made work. If they don't it could take quite a while to sort out and get very messy.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 3190 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
14887_1622315122.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_14887.jpg |
|
| Quote: Slugger McBatt "From the outside looking in, it is hard not to feel that there has been a huge con-job on the rugby fans of Wakefield, and on the general public. The permission granted was obtained on the provision of a community sports stadium with the city's only professional sports team as the major tenant. For the stadium not to be built looks like a massive con-job. "Thanks for the permission. Now do one!"
I know other factors are involved that change things, but surely the position should be that if there is no stadium, the development ends. If the community stadium is provided at Belle Vue (my preference anyway), I can see how it can be justified, but with no sign of movement on that front it seems like the con-job is almost complete.
The frustrating thing is that there is no lack of will. People (and we know who they are) have put countless hours of their own time into this, and I don't know how they do it.
The answer seems simple enough
It would make a good Book
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7423 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
14916_1445291540.jpeg Twitter...@GINGERWILDCAT:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_14916.jpeg |
|
| Quote: djcool "It would make a good Book'"
Don't say that, at the speed he's churning them out he'll have one on the shelves in Asda by bonfire night
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33791.jpg [b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable
...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo]
[quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish>
IA mode off. [/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg |
|
| Quote: TRB "Whilst it is well known now that the 106 doesn't work as intended, we do not consider it value-less.
The inspectors report is very clear and unambiguous about why PP was granted and what he expected to occur, the 106 agreement doesn't deliver that, but the intention was clear.
We are looking into every avenue to ensure that we know who to hit and what with.
I don't hold it against anyone who has lost all will over this matter - as Slugger says, there is a massive injustice which has occurred - but we can't afford to give up on this - our only chance to achieve something significant (be it NM or BV) - whilst ever there is the faintest pulse in the body of this deal.
I don't think it will be long now before we will be in a position to provide more details about what is going on in the background.
Really sorry that we cant say more at this point.'"
What my mate TRB said...
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33791.jpg [b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable
...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo]
[quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish>
IA mode off. [/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg |
|
| Quote: Slugger McBatt "From the outside looking in, it is hard not to feel that there has been a huge con-job on the rugby fans of Wakefield, and on the general public. The permission granted was obtained on the provision of a community sports stadium with the city's only professional sports team as the major tenant. For the stadium not to be built looks like a massive con-job. "Thanks for the permission. Now do one!"
I know other factors are involved that change things, but surely the position should be that if there is no stadium, the development ends. If the community stadium is provided at Belle Vue (my preference anyway), I can see how it can be justified, but with no sign of movement on that front it seems like the con-job is almost complete.
The frustrating thing is that there is no lack of will. People (and we know who they are) have put countless hours of their own time into this, and I don't know how they do it.
The answer seems simple enough
This is a great post and the only answer I can give is that while I can see exactly why it might look and seem simple, it really isn't! In fact, as we have worked harder over the last few months, it has got slightly more complex and not less... however, following a lengthy and very positive meeting this week (and we have had at least one meeting or another every week for the last couple of months, sometimes two or three) then we are working out the best path to bring about the best possible resolution we can. And, we still believe that could be a new stadium at Newmarket or alternatively a substantially redeveloped Belle Vue.
As Phil says, we can't say any more at the moment, and we hope everyone understands that we can't purely because it could (and probably would) impact on the best possible deal we want to achieve. When we can tell you we will and equally, we might need help... and the timing could be everything!
Keep the faith people, the small group of people closely involved with this alongside TRB, MC, CB and I are spending a good chunck of time, on a weekly basis at the moment, trying to make this happen. BTW, I don't want your praise for this, I am doing this for lots of reasons and praise is not one of them, but I just want everyone to understand that we are all doing this because we believe we can do it... and if we don't, then we will be content within ourselves that we did everything it was possible to do!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
33791.jpg [b:1swa1vwo]Change is inevitable
...except from a vending machine![/b:1swa1vwo]
[quote="BillyRhino":1swa1vwo]So in best IA mode ..<.Possibley World Class, could be the greatest thing since sliced bread....am personally very excited, and confidently expect him to prove my predictions are bang on target.... Alternatively he could be rubbish>
IA mode off. [/quote:1swa1vwo]:33791.jpg |
|
| Quote: sixtogo "If the 106 isn't legally binding, which it appears not, the options available are limited without the will of the developer to 'do the right thing'. It would seem that in this case Yorkcourt can't or won't do that. The political will of the council would be of great benefit but that also seems to be sadly lacking also in this case, it would appear they have washed their hands of the issue. The local MP's may well pay it lip service but most are as much actual use as a chocolate fireguard and given there was oppostion to the scheme as well it will be a sensitive issue around general election time, especially given the cuts that have taken place since that 15K petition in favour was gained. So it would seem the main option would the entire development going to a judicial review which could in theory either force the re-writing of the S106, at which point the developer could pull out if they felt the need, or the overturning the entire ruling. The obvious downside to that obviously is that there will still be no stadium or requirement for the community facilities and these things are potentially not cheap. Who would fund it? Maybe the threat of this would bring YCP to the table with a genuine offer, probably involving Belle Vue, to remedy the situation and stop the whole development and, more importantly to them, their payday going down the pan.
What I can't see is it being anything other than a re-developed Belle Vue now though. I would imagine for YCP to have anything like the funds to build a stadium and still walk away with a worthwhile (to them) profit for their efforts they would like some of the land designated for the stadium at Newmarket leaving just a token gesture of maybe a couple of 3G pitches there. Question is will their offer (if it ever were to happen and I have my serious doubts on that) be enough to buy back BV AND the surrounding land AND pay for a major revamp of the stadium, which lets be honest is necessary? Again I have my doubts and they will use every trick in the book to get away with paying as little as possible if anything at all.
I have nothing but respect to those fighting this and I really hope you can somehow garner something that benefits the club and the community out of all this but it is really all now down to where YCP will play ball and the threats that will have to be made work. If they don't it could take quite a while to sort out and get very messy.'"
This is a great post too BTW...
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2107 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| It good to hear that our corner is still being fought, we will do this.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4927 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3634.jpg [IMG]//i50.tinypic.com/a59ff5.gif[/IMG]:3634.jpg |
|
| Quote: chissitt "We could and should have been in the Pugney's area of Denby Dale road years' ago if it had not been for the action's of one man.'"
Think you maybe mixed up re Pugney's when the Asda was originally built there was an opportunity for a new ground there as Asda wanted the ground as a site for the supermarket. It was reheated at the time by the council I believe. Then thee was the issue of Yorkshire leaving Heading let and a new ground in Wakefield just off Junction 39 Yorkshire decided to stay and develop the HQ at Headingley.
Following that we had the bluster if a stadium at Sharlston on the pit site. We had Queens Drive on of these opting resulting in McAlpines building the toilets and putting barriers in at BV.
Moving on it was Thorne Park and a possible at some point with Ossett Town rejected by Town. Then Newmarket.
So in 30 or 35 years nothing has changed it looks like a distant dream to me
|
|
|
|
|
|