Are not all SL contracts, just that? If we are not in SL they wouldn't be valid

There will be relegation clauses in contracts and I imagine a lot of players will be allowed to leave if we are not playing super league. It shouldn't be a massive issue. It may have some impact but not as much as some posters suggest.

But if you were a player, would you want the stress of having to find another club, or would you rather sign longer term with a club that was unlikely to be relegated?

I think it is an issue - another example of how the new structure is good for the teams who are safe, but crap for clubs like us.

Hence why I said it would have some impact.

Has Sykes been told out of contract at end of season and a Superleague one pays more. At Bulls he always seemed to up his game when his job was on the line.

Fox can't get into the team can he?
I think Sykes may offer more across a number of positions for another 1 year deal. Wildie hasn't had a run at all to justify another contract yet.Agree with the others.

Fairbank and Riley may be worth also trying to offer 1 year deals if unwanted at their parent clubs

Riley would get a 2 year deal for me if we could get him.

I don't think we will be in a position to resign any players until we know what division we are in next season. The same goes for any possible new signings.