Quote: Slugger McBatt "I don't think it's corrupt. I just think it does its best to protect what it believes are its greatest assets, which is understandable. To lose a Bulls, for example, would be bad for the sport, and given their success on and off the field in the past, they do what they can to protect a prize asset.
With their non-prize assets, like us, they will help us, but are regarded as a little more expendable, interchangeable with Halifax or Leigh, for example.
I do think the RFL act honestly in what they consider to be the best interests of the sport. As a fan of a particular club, however, fairness and even-handedness is more important. I just want an equal shot at the prize.'"
It was worth looking back on here (I thought against my better judgment), to read that post.
Even though the poster has had a right go at me elsewhere, I'm more than happy to say what a spot-on post that is.
As it happens, and despite the very best endeavours of the usual suspects to try and make me loathe and despise your club, I happen to think Wakefield Trinity is also a "prize asset" that should be "protected".
Those who know me from way back, before the usual suspects gained sway on here, will know that was always my view. When I was a kid, growing up in the East Midlands and watching Eddie Waring on the TV, the three clubs whose names I could remember and quote were Keighley, Bradford Northern and (especially) Wakefield Trinity. In 1975 I remember watching "Trinity Tales" on the TV. The history has to count for something IMO. Same goes for Keighley.
Anyway, as TRB will be relieved again to hear, I have gone again now. Saw no harm in acknowledging an excellent post, though, even if he won't thank me beause my endorsememt will likely harm his credibility.
