Like I said I really liked him when he played SO for Saints & I'd have him here in a heartbeat but with finances to consider and the lad going out on Loan to a team with a bit of spare cash, it isn't gonna happen.

Your right I haven't seen Lee Gaskells academy games I have seen him in the saints first team where he played mostly at half back and a few at centre, as I said he's a good player and had a pretty good kicking game from what I saw, that said depending on how he plays he will probably sign on with Salford or go to another so team but I doubt that would be us.

That statement says more about you than him

If i recall he captained Wigan's valvoline grand final winning side. Was suprised Wigan let him go, although he was never going to get in over o'cocklan at loose forward. Will hopefully fill out his massive potential at 13 or even 9.

While he may have a point (one I disagree with it) its a point that is constantly mentioned
and thus, rather boring.

got to agree I was sorry to see himleave Wakey

Unfortunately, it's the only point he ever makes; he's a one-issue campaigner - the UKIP of RLFans.

Yep you are wrong. Again.

Vastly underrated when he was with us. It did him no favours being in a poor inexperienced side at the time.

Does this mean that the powers that be at Salford do not rate Sneyd ( sp ), if so I would love to see him at Wakey. Watch Sneyd carry the Salford under 18`s then their 20`s , he has always looked very good when given his chance him the first team. Remember a few seasons ago when he ran us ragged at Salford in the last game of the season when Kear choose to play Latu and Gleeson, who were both leaving us, instead of given youngsters a chance, Anakin and Walshaw should have played that day.

i dont get bored at all its a subject i feel strongly about, if you want to know what bores me its the same lot who come on here and try and belittle folk if they dont agree with their opinion .tell you what another thing i feel strongly about its these same folk with most of their post are pretty limited in my opinion on their rugby knowledge

I'd normally come to the defence of someone being rounded on by others for just stating an opinion but you've raised a subject you have already raised elsewhere and derailed a perfectly good post on a different subject.
You leave yourself open when you do that.

On the Gaskill subject, I'd take him for stand off. I wouldn't replace Mathers with him.

On Howarth, I always thought he was good. I think he is just a bit light weight but certainly has skills, a good brain and works hard. Hope Sts keep him.

He looked solid today for Saints, did the basics well and generally got a quick accurate pass out from acting half back. He'll look to express himself more as he gets more comfortable with his surroundings.