Luke has improved alot this season and last night Penny saved us on several occasions, just watch first ten minutes of first half again to see two examples. He was also close to stopping another try. At least the centres and wings are defending wider than last season when we had Blanch and Gleeson stood under the crossbar most of the time. I just do not know what some of you expect , two months ago we were looking at oblivion , keeping Saints scoreless for 20 mins was an achievement in itself. We did make mistakes but we never gave up

In 100% agreement. The players need our full support at games and bagging them won't help.

All of our three-quarters will sleep better this weekend than Paul Sykes.

i have heard your defence of the scumbag richardson but now to slag murphy ??? u really are unbelievable!!! he is our best centre / winger / fullback !!!

He hasn't slagged Murphy off.

I can't recall saying George did anything wrong. However, he has spent most of the last two seasons as a winger and therefore is probably more suited to the position then Murphy.

Why does every post from you have to come with such arrogance, as if nobody but you has the right to an opinion, because your always right and nobody else is.

Your the one who has his sums wrong, still believing Ted did what he believed was best for the club and not himself and his family. Now that to me is far sillier than suggesting George onto the wing for Penny and Murphy in at centre.

I have noticed George putting some big hits in this season. What he does do is run backwards instead of forwards when he is being attacked. Also the try Saints scored straight from the scrum was just poor. He was too close to the man inside him which in a set piece defensive situation is very poor indeed.

I think it's shown over the last couple of weeks that George is better suited to the centre role than on the wing. Will be some interesting decisions to make when Murphy comes back and that is not always a good thing for Kear.

What are you on?.

For starters Ted Richardson has nothing to do with this. Newsflash to you and your chum, I don't defend Ted I defend his right to a fair trial rather than be lynched by hillbillies like you. I'll tell you what big man, I'll arrange a meeting with you and Ted and you can call him a scumbag to his face. The guy maybe 70 but I reckon he's still got the balls to face up to you - deal?

Did I slag off your precious Murphy, well didums - even though I clearly didn't.

He is not our best anything yet, but don't let that stand in the way of your little crush.

That's your argument for the respective positions of George, Penny and Murphy. You accuse me of arrogance, I consider it a trust in my convictions - what's for certain is it's better thought out than your last post. What amuses me is the strident nature in which people post on here, yet when they occasionally get back what they don't they cry foul - unreal.

There you go, again your right and your post is better than mine.

You look back on any of my posts and you won't find me resorting to insulting people because they don't share the same opinion as me, I prefer to try and have a reasoned debate. Whereas you unfortunately have a habit of insulting people who don't happen to share the same opinion as you.

On some occasions you may make a fair point, but the way it is delievered is sadly lacking in any class or respect for others.