I am sorry to point this out to someone so obviously above the rest of us. When stating someone is talking 'Utter Rubbish' is not questioning them. You made a statement, a statement suggests that you have information to contradict what was posted, but as usual you start the 'my dad is bigger than your dad' tactic of a primary school kid. It has been stated in the past that Ted turned people away who wanted to invest. Again all you have proven is that although you like to think you have the answers you are in the same position as many of us, where speculation, rumour and opinion is all we have.

The highlighted part, couldn't the same be said of you?????

I can back up Kinley on Steve Parkin making an offer of investment in August 2010 which was turned down. FACT.

Buhh$hit! you just like to sit in judgement on everyone, if you dont have the facts, you dont have the capability to disprove anyone else so give the holyer than thou bit a rest, it's/you're becoming painfully boring!!

As a 'Wildcat' supporter I am sad to admit that the club has been nothing short of a joke whilst under the supposed leadership of Mr Ted Richardson. I know of certain individuals who will never invest in the club whilst that man retains the slightest links. The sooner we get rid the better. In a few years time I would like to see the likes of my 9 yr old son growing up and playing with pride for his hometown club. If that means a few years spent in lower league football then so be it.

Do you wish to expand on that list - or are you happy to conclude that you know exactly how each one of us feels about Ted; how much we have had to do to try and work on behalf of the club and how much success or otherwise we have been able to achieve therein?

You could also just accept that what's done is done and concern yourself with the future of the club without trying to pigeon-hole people as you think befits them.

We are ALL supporters of the same club. It belonged mainly to Ted, now it seems it will belong entirely to Andrew - let's just deal with that now, as ALL the other reports can be conflicted against each other with equal validity, yet without anyone - and I mean anyone - being able to tell the full story from all angles.

Just a thought!

How is that proof anymore than those suggesting Feres. It's just a statement, where are the links to the press on google, where are the notes in the AGM.

Expressing an interest is not the same as offering concrete proposals.

Steve Ferres did indeed express an interest, but he couldn't or wouldn't find the monies even with his partners to take the club over. Ted Richardson was not obliged to sell his interest in the club at the time when things were good whether you like it or not. Don't kid yourselves a take over is what these "investors" wanted. That is a million miles from someone wanting to invest in an existing and at the time reasonably successfull club. As for Parkin, since when? that to me appears to be a case of putting 2 + 2 together and getting 2000 because the guy is involved at the club.

I'm simply sick of posters boldly stating opinion on here as fact and then getting a huff when the non sheep dare to question them. I'm not saying your wrong or lying but as I have no idea as to who you are I'm not obliged to take your word for it.

To me your comment as regards Teds rectum shows just what a flawed poster you actually are - it's very sad.

New poster, stunning. Teds gone - so where are they?

I quite sure what you are talking about.

However the fact that you give a first time poster such a level of credibility demonstrates to me just how low your truth threshold must be.

So if TRB creates a new ID stating Ted is totally innocent will you be so easily impressed?