Rumour in Hull is Brough the other way.

id say going back on your word and your contract is leaving under a cloud,plus the fact he was sneaking around with his old man "agreeing" to join rovers behind his current employers backs....

Wrong.

Guess we'll see

I meant that there was no suggestion that his playing ability was in doubt or that he had fallen out with anyone, which was the earlier suggestion. The fact that he was doing the dirty behind the scenes doesn't mean that he wasn't cutting it on the pitch, and that's all that bothers me. If he comes to us and then does the dirty, like going to Cas, which is of course downright filthy, then we'll move on and boo him a bit when he returns.

We will.

no doubting cookes talent on the field, but off it he's a complete waste of time/...

What as ? Hooker ? How many do you want ?

would they play brough at 9??? cus 7 is already mopped up with dobson..

I'm sure you're right, but I'm only interested in him for 80 minutes a week.

I'm not really concerned about his off the field stuff purely because he is a known quantity to our coach, as were King and Brough when they arrived. We know what we are getting.

I'd assume Brough will play 6 and be the running half we so desire

so do i, cus he was in a well know drininking area in hull 20 mins after you had been destroyed by hudds, leathered..

Must have mixed badly with his lemsip