I'm not sure what Terry Kelly thinks that image shows. He might as well have shown it two frames earlier to show he didn't ground the ball.

It finished over the line. Ref thought so. Video ref thought so.........it's a try.

The ball is actually grounded in the photo, eye test required love ?

Even if it wasn't a try it should have been a penalty try because without the tackle in the air bjb would have definitely scored. So , as we missed the conversion we were robbed of 2 points.

Let it go and move on...Widnes next isn't it?

Haha he didn't say it wasn't grounded there love!!.what he was saying is the ball was still rolling forward with momentum so that picture is irrelevant

on further evidence, the ball did touch '4 blades' of white grass, so it was definitely a try.

We know

Out of order! Its old love

I think there's still a bit of forward momentum after this frame, but being perfectly honest its not cast iron proved one way or the other, the ref said try, the vid ref couldn't disprove it so that's that, there is no other mechanism available to change it.
There are far more obvious no try's given as try's than that.
Nah, the game goes to sh1! when you give officials the opportunity to make bad calls.

No, Catalans.

It was short, it wasn't a try, I wouldn't have given it. But, the ref gave it, the video ref couldn't see enough to overturn it, four points, a well earned victory for us. Let's move on now love.

That game was all about 'if's', 'buts', and 'maybes'. At the end of the day, you won 28-24 and, on the balance of play, you deserved the victory. Well done, and here's to next time.