|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 10647 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote pyeman="pyeman"
As for the funding apparently a chinese company have now bought the hicksons site and are removing the chemical licence which is the only thing that has been stopping the sale of WR. Heard a whisper the other week and took it with a pinch of salt but now hearing the same thing on here from cas and wakey fans.'"
Chinese whispers eh? Reliable as ever.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | London Skolars |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The overwhelming view of both polls is that we go to Newmarket.
I know this is not a scientific study carried out by p07034096eople with clipboards but it's still a sizeable majority.
I'll say it again, if we can(and the people at York Court, comm trust etc are all still backing it) then we should push on with Newmarket, we should suggest that if the council can't back both they should back neither, or split what money there is!
I firmly believe that glasshoughton cannot go ahead/as they hope, without us being involved and that is the view of the councillors interested.
I said in a post earlier on that the council would hide behind economic excuses long before this latest setback and they have, what we must do is continue to push on and highlight where ever there are leanings to one club or the other.
What we also need and I'm getting fed up of repeating this, is a strong statement of intent from our people, otherwise it looks like we're dead in the water at a time when a bit of front is needed.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 312 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| They (Community Trust, WTRLFC & SWAG) have already have made a strong statement of intent on the day all this flared up.
Unlike Richard Wright who has done a complete 'U Turn' from his previous stance when invited to join in with the Community Stadium ... and now thinks sharing is a good idea.
What does that tell you?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 8487 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Catwoman1="Catwoman1"They (Community Trust, WTRLFC & SWAG) have already have made a strong statement of intent on the day all this flared up.
Unlike Richard Wright who has done a complete 'U Turn' from his previous stance when invited to join in with the Community Stadium ... and now thinks sharing is a good idea.
What does that tell you?'"
RW has always welcomed Wakefield coming to GH. Just not Cas to Wakefield.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5392 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 24 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Fully="Fully"RW has always welcomed Wakefield coming to GH. Just not Cas to Wakefield.'"
Because one would be a ground share and the other one wouldn't?? 
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 645 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2010 | Nov 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Catwoman1="Catwoman1"They (Community Trust, WTRLFC & SWAG) have already have made a strong statement of intent on the day all this flared up.
Unlike Richard Wright who has done a complete 'U Turn' from his previous stance when invited to join in with the Community Stadium ... and now thinks sharing is a good idea.
What does that tell you?'"
Richard Wright has welcomed the inquiry, but its findings are not binding and looks to me like a fact finding mission just to see if the council can save cash and drop their involvment in either scheme.
Glasshoughton will be built without Wakey or the council , as will Newmarket, but they are hoping for such an uproar to the sharing crap that they can withdraw any funding/help and blame someone else .
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 312 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Just remind me again where the money for Glasshoughton is coming from ... and why full planning permission has not been sought so that the work on the stadium can get started.
Our full plans are ready and waiting to go as soon as outline permission is granted.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 645 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2010 | Nov 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Catwoman1="Catwoman1"Just remind me again where the money for Glasshoughton is coming from ... and why full planning permission has not been sought so that the work on the stadium can get started.
Our full plans are ready and waiting to go as soon as outline permission is granted.'"
and when will the outline be granted ???? is it after the public enquiry ???
Leeds city council will do all in their power to shaft Wakey as will the tree huggers, you will get Newmarket but will it be too late to save trinity ?
ditto for Cas, well the too late bit
ed off with it all now, you get yours and we'll get ours and no sharing whatsoever. good luck
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 23 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2016 | Aug 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| If the Newmarket site was a viable option then no. But it is not, there are far too many obstacles to overcome. We need to stop kidding ourselves on. It won't happen certainly not in the forseeable future.
Therefore I would be prepared to go to Glasshoughton, otherwise we could be out. It is in a prime position has access roads all over the place and is easily accessible.
The only other option is to go to Barnsley until a day or date where we could get our own ground.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 312 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2014 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ambernotyeller="ambernotyeller"and when will the outline be granted ???? is it after the public enquiry ???
Leeds city council will do all in their power to shaft Wakey as will the tree huggers, you will get Newmarket but will it be too late to save trinity ?
ditto for Cas, well the too late bit
vexed off with it all now, you get yours and we'll get ours and no sharing whatsoever. good luck'"
That hasn't answered the straightforward question I asked though has it?
Going off on one about what you hope will happen to Newmarket seems to suggest you don't have the answers.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 8487 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Catwoman1="Catwoman1"Just remind me again where the money for Glasshoughton is coming from ... and why full planning permission has not been sought so that the work on the stadium can get started.
Our full plans are ready and waiting to go as soon as outline permission is granted.'"
To be honest, the only people that know where the money is coming from are those involved.
However, full planning permission hasn't been sought due to the fact of a) funding and b) because we haven't got full plans drawn up, of which, are being done now and should be available within a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 645 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2010 | Nov 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Catwoman1="Catwoman1"That hasn't answered the straightforward question I asked though has it?
Going off on one about what you hope will happen to Newmarket seems to suggest you don't have the answers.'"
Going off on one ??????
jeeeze have a word with yourself, I only asked you questions knowing that you have no answers , just like the questions you asked about Glasshoughton.
the truth girl is that me and you and everyone else that cares about our clubs and the game in general are being s hit on from a great height and until we are told what is happening we are expected to keep arguing the virtues of our ground as opposed to yours.
I think the council will just pull the plug on any financial help for either site and this study just gets them involved out of the office for a few hours and a couple of free pub lunches while debating the matter thrown in.
no share, no merger, thats my opinion
|
|
|
 |
|