|
FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Stadium Press Conference |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1470 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: TrinityIHC "I dunno, you offer the use of your potential new facility to someone and not content with a "no thanks" - they have to kick off!
Theres gratitude for you!'"
So true.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: TrinityIHC "I dunno, you offer the use of your potential new facility to someone and not content with a "no thanks" - they have to kick off!
Theres gratitude for you!'"
Until it is built it isn't worth a carrot , and if it is built I think you might just regret it , what you have got today is what we had at leigh 8 years ago
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7423 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7423 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: those were the days "12K will be big enough for a small tem like wakey.'"
Ok then cocky lad,what's a tem???
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 130 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2011 | Nov 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Not having a transcript of the press conference it's impossible to know how the presentation was structured, but I am suprised that so much appears to have been made about the use of the stadium by our neighbouring clubs. I don't have a problem with this at all but is this significant? Has this become a requirement now of Council support or the funding scenario?
The current picture of a contentious (site wide) scheme, both commercially and from a town planning point of view means we will have a very nervy few years. I don't unfortunately see this being resolved within the timescales suggested by some.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1494 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| In terms of town planning it's perfect. straight off the motorway and into the complex. no city congestion... Perfect location IMO
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 13813 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: rubber man "Not having a transcript of the press conference it's impossible to know how the presentation was structured, but I am suprised that so much appears to have been made about the use of the stadium by our neighbouring clubs. I don't have a problem with this at all but is this significant? Has this become a requirement now of Council support or the funding scenario?
The current picture of a contentious (site wide) scheme, both commercially and from a town planning point of view means we will have a very nervy few years. I don't unfortunately see this being resolved within the timescales suggested by some.'"
As far as I’m aware the scheme is not reliant upon others playing there and the funding is based on the rest of the scheme getting approval.
If you go to the Stadium Q&A thread on the last page there is a well thought-out balanced viewpoint on the wider scheme and the potential objectors.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 13813 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Also the town planning will see 800 less cars enter Wakefield with the proposed P&R scheme to be based at the new stadium.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2925 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2011 | Apr 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Khlav Kalash "Also the town planning will see 800 less cars enter Wakefield with the proposed P&R scheme to be based at the new stadium.'" yep every ones a winner with this developement, should and will happen
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2220 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Starbug "Until it is built it isn't worth a carrot , and if it is built I think you might just regret it , what you have got today is what we had at leigh 8 years ago'"
I'm sorrry but it's worth lots of carrots my friend. The project is progressing well probably to your dissapointment. Your hopes off getting in SL probably depended on us, cas and Salford not getting our stadium. Having said that your lack of competativness on the pitch will probably see you stuck in the championship for a long time to come.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Ok, let me tell you what I see, as a Leeds Rhinos living in Stanley and a construction professional.
Firstly, as I understand it, the council own the land upon which the whole development is going to be built. They have already given the land (possible 999 year lease) the stadium will occupy to the Community Foundation to enable them to lend money against it as an asset. I suspect that the council have done a deal with Yorkcourt in respect of selling (or again long lease) them the remaining land at at a sum below the best possible current market value with Yorkcourt effectively then giving that sum of money back and possible a little more to the Community Foundation as a donation to the scheme. This means the council are not actually paying out any council tax payers money directly, so it is cost neutral in effect. The majority of the proceeding from the sale of Belle Vue will also be given to the Foundation for the build. The Foundation, being independent, will also be able to access other funding streams such as central government grants, lottery grants and EU funding. This is also why it is planned as a community sports facility and not a private development by a privately owned RL club like Wakefield. Wakefield will of course be then given, once completed, a long term lease so there future is secure in the ground itself. There is also probably some huge tax breaks of the giving of the money to a foundation and also developing a formal industrial site, even if it now resides in green-belt.
Yorkcourt planning permission will be conditional on them completing the new highway works and giving the agreed sum of money for the build of the new ground before any other developments start on site.
It is clear that Yorkcourt have to have a full planning green-light to give the money to the foundation to complete the funding required to build the ground. The overall and full development of the site will probably take at least 5 if not towards 10 years and Yorkcourt will know that and are it in for the long-term investment return. As such Yorkcourt don't need to build anything straight away, so it does all rest on getting planning, but I also suspect that Yorkcourt will have at least a few larger tenants interested in units and the hotel and fast-food outlet as well. Rumours in the industry are saying that Tesco are interested in a distribution warehouse on the site as they lack space in the region.
Now planning, well as much as the residents of Newmarket Lane will complain and they will claim because there are only a handful of them directly affected they are being simply brushed aside, I think they are going to struggle to make any legitimate planning objections. They are all ready making the mistake of going down a NIMBY route and that, despite the fact know one wants a huge great industrial estate building at the back of their house, is not a legitimate reason in the eyes of planning law to object. The Yorkcourt team and DLA Architects have thought about the potential objections and the new road means that they will have a now very quiet access only road outside their properties, they have put in screening at the rear of the properties, so they will not see anything and made sure service yards to the units are away from the houses, so reducing noise. The noise from the stadium is no objection because it last for, on average, 2 hours every two weeks and the ground is as far from residents as it could be. They will probably make the mistake, as many do, of trying so hard to stop the development that they will miss any potential legitimate minor changes to the current proposals that ultimately make life better for them to live within the development. They will be there in a few years wondering why they did not ask them to do this with the road, put in more trees here, move that building slightly further away etc, I see it all the time, they will probably regret it if not careful. They might even spend money on legal representation that will cost them money and gain them nothing.
The only sticking point and potential ace up the residents sleeve is the issue of the development being on the current UDP green-belt. I am sure Wakefield planning will pass the scheme but they could ask the Secretary of State to review and call-in the proposal for review. That said, the governments primary focus will be assessing the impact of reduction of the green-belt, not whether it upsets the local residents, and given it is an old colliery site and have some continued community use, they are unlikley to stop it... but this is the very unpredictable bit!
My gut and professional opinion is that it is likely to get the nod. If it does not get called in, then I can see the ground starting to be open in time for 2012 otherwise it could be delayed, but only by months and not years. Lets see and hope it does all go well, I went to the community centre and ticked yes as a local anyway!
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3829 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo " Snip '"
What a thoroughly interesting read, thanks for that.
What a shame you’re a Leeds Fan .
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7423 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "Ok, let me tell you what I see, as a Leeds Rhinos living in Stanley and a construction professional.
Firstly, as I understand it, the council own the land upon which the whole development is going to be built. They have already given the land (possible 999 year lease) the stadium will occupy to the Community Foundation to enable them to lend money against it as an asset. I suspect that the council have done a deal with Yorkcourt in respect of selling (or again long lease) them the remaining land at at a sum below the best possible current market value with Yorkcourt effectively then giving that sum of money back and possible a little more to the Community Foundation as a donation to the scheme. This means the council are not actually paying out any council tax payers money directly, so it is cost neutral in effect. The majority of the proceeding from the sale of Belle Vue will also be given to the Foundation for the build. The Foundation, being independent, will also be able to access other funding streams such as central government grants, lottery grants and EU funding. This is also why it is planned as a community sports facility and not a private development by a privately owned RL club like Wakefield. Wakefield will of course be then given, once completed, a long term lease so there future is secure in the ground itself. There is also probably some huge tax breaks of the giving of the money to a foundation and also developing a formal industrial site, even if it now resides in green-belt.
Yorkcourt planning permission will be conditional on them completing the new highway works and giving the agreed sum of money for the build of the new ground before any other developments start on site.
It is clear that Yorkcourt have to have a full planning green-light to give the money to the foundation to complete the funding required to build the ground. The overall and full development of the site will probably take at least 5 if not towards 10 years and Yorkcourt will know that and are it in for the long-term investment return. As such Yorkcourt don't need to build anything straight away, so it does all rest on getting planning, but I also suspect that Yorkcourt will have at least a few larger tenants interested in units and the hotel and fast-food outlet as well. Rumours in the industry are saying that Tesco are interested in a distribution warehouse on the site as they lack space in the region.
Now planning, well as much as the residents of Newmarket Lane will complain and they will claim because there are only a handful of them directly affected they are being simply brushed aside, I think they are going to struggle to make any legitimate planning objections. They are all ready making the mistake of going down a NIMBY route and that, despite the fact know one wants a huge great industrial estate building at the back of their house, is not a legitimate reason in the eyes of planning law to object. The Yorkcourt team and DLA Architects have thought about the potential objections and the new road means that they will have a now very quiet access only road outside their properties, they have put in screening at the rear of the properties, so they will not see anything and made sure service yards to the units are away from the houses, so reducing noise. The noise from the stadium is no objection because it last for, on average, 2 hours every two weeks and the ground is as far from residents as it could be. They will probably make the mistake, as many do, of trying so hard to stop the development that they will miss any potential legitimate minor changes to the current proposals that ultimately make life better for them to live within the development. They will be there in a few years wondering why they did not ask them to do this with the road, put in more trees here, move that building slightly further away etc, I see it all the time, they will probably regret it if not careful. They might even spend money on legal representation that will cost them money and gain them nothing.
The only sticking point and potential ace up the residents sleeve is the issue of the development being on the current UDP green-belt. I am sure Wakefield planning will pass the scheme but they could ask the Secretary of State to review and call-in the proposal for review. That said, the governments primary focus will be assessing the impact of reduction of the green-belt, not whether it upsets the local residents, and given it is an old colliery site and have some continued community use, they are unlikley to stop it... but this is the very unpredictable bit!
My gut and professional opinion is that it is likely to get the nod. If it does not get called in, then I can see the ground starting to be open in time for 2012 otherwise it could be delayed, but only by months and not years. Lets see and hope it does all go well, I went to the community centre and ticked yes as a local anyway!'"
What an excellent read!
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3829 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: deeHell "I'm sorrry but it's worth lots of carrots my friend. The project is progressing well probably to your dissapointment. Your hopes off getting in SL probably depended on us, cas and Salford not getting our stadium. Having said that your lack of competativness on the pitch will probably see you stuck in the championship for a long time to come.'"
I don’t think Starbug is disappointed, just pointing out the pitfalls Leigh have endured, both during the construction of the stadium & also how the club are now treated as tenants.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 5086 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2022 | Nov 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Inflatable_Armadillo "Ok, let me tell you what I see, as a Leeds Rhinos living in Stanley and a construction professional.
Firstly, as I understand it, the council own the land upon which the whole development is going to be built. They have already given the land (possible 999 year lease) the stadium will occupy to the Community Foundation to enable them to lend money against it as an asset. I suspect that the council have done a deal with Yorkcourt in respect of selling (or again long lease) them the remaining land at at a sum below the best possible current market value with Yorkcourt effectively then giving that sum of money back and possible a little more to the Community Foundation as a donation to the scheme. This means the council are not actually paying out any council tax payers money directly, so it is cost neutral in effect. The majority of the proceeding from the sale of Belle Vue will also be given to the Foundation for the build. The Foundation, being independent, will also be able to access other funding streams such as central government grants, lottery grants and EU funding. This is also why it is planned as a community sports facility and not a private development by a privately owned RL club like Wakefield. Wakefield will of course be then given, once completed, a long term lease so there future is secure in the ground itself. There is also probably some huge tax breaks of the giving of the money to a foundation and also developing a formal industrial site, even if it now resides in green-belt.
Yorkcourt planning permission will be conditional on them completing the new highway works and giving the agreed sum of money for the build of the new ground before any other developments start on site.
It is clear that Yorkcourt have to have a full planning green-light to give the money to the foundation to complete the funding required to build the ground. The overall and full development of the site will probably take at least 5 if not towards 10 years and Yorkcourt will know that and are it in for the long-term investment return. As such Yorkcourt don't need to build anything straight away, so it does all rest on getting planning, but I also suspect that Yorkcourt will have at least a few larger tenants interested in units and the hotel and fast-food outlet as well. Rumours in the industry are saying that Tesco are interested in a distribution warehouse on the site as they lack space in the region.
Now planning, well as much as the residents of Newmarket Lane will complain and they will claim because there are only a handful of them directly affected they are being simply brushed aside, I think they are going to struggle to make any legitimate planning objections. They are all ready making the mistake of going down a NIMBY route and that, despite the fact know one wants a huge great industrial estate building at the back of their house, is not a legitimate reason in the eyes of planning law to object. The Yorkcourt team and DLA Architects have thought about the potential objections and the new road means that they will have a now very quiet access only road outside their properties, they have put in screening at the rear of the properties, so they will not see anything and made sure service yards to the units are away from the houses, so reducing noise. The noise from the stadium is no objection because it last for, on average, 2 hours every two weeks and the ground is as far from residents as it could be. They will probably make the mistake, as many do, of trying so hard to stop the development that they will miss any potential legitimate minor changes to the current proposals that ultimately make life better for them to live within the development. They will be there in a few years wondering why they did not ask them to do this with the road, put in more trees here, move that building slightly further away etc, I see it all the time, they will probably regret it if not careful. They might even spend money on legal representation that will cost them money and gain them nothing.
The only sticking point and potential ace up the residents sleeve is the issue of the development being on the current UDP green-belt. I am sure Wakefield planning will pass the scheme but they could ask the Secretary of State to review and call-in the proposal for review. That said, the governments primary focus will be assessing the impact of reduction of the green-belt, not whether it upsets the local residents, and given it is an old colliery site and have some continued community use, they are unlikley to stop it... but this is the very unpredictable bit!
My gut and professional opinion is that it is likely to get the nod. If it does not get called in, then I can see the ground starting to be open in time for 2012 otherwise it could be delayed, but only by months and not years. Lets see and hope it does all go well, I went to the community centre and ticked yes as a local anyway!'"
Whilst I agree with the majority of your posting, i was under the impression that the land was already owned by Yorkcourt and that the land that the council has put aside for us to use as collateral is actually elsewhere and not directly part of the development area.
Maybe someone who knows a bit more could clarify this point.
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
3.876953125:10
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.65M | 1,716 | 80,156 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|