Quote wire-quin="wire-quin"Is it really that bad? It was clear to see the stand behind the sticks isn't finished. Once that's done the ground will cater for the small support we have, whilst also catering for away fans.
Theres a nice bar for people to enjoy, a bar near where the Wakey fans were sat and a new bar going in the new stand when finished
Standing along one touchline for those that like to be close to the action
The variety is endless.
What more do you need??'"
Wakefield get criticised for the view at BV but, although the stand behind the sticks was indeed close to the action, the view from the front two rows was just too low down.
It's a tidy little ground if you are aiming for a few hundred fans but, it struggled to cope with a couple of thousand yesterday.
Mind you, your team played well so, I'm sure that you aren't bothered.
The facilities are a long way form either the Stoop, which was top draw and still some way behind The Hive, which was still some way off SL Standard.
I know that you have dispensation from The RFL for your facilities but, does this also come with the drop in funding that other clubs have ?
Getting back to Wakefield
I believe that we took London far too lightly and we should have gone with our absolute strongest 17 and worked harder to batter London's lighter forwards I think they call it "setting the platform".
Also, Hampshire has some great quality coming forward but as a defensive FB I'd prefer Jowitt.
It's only Saints next week so, we can rack up our first 2 league points then
However well London played and the did play well, we threw away 2 points, which we cant get back.
Really disappointing performance accross the park and only Fifita seemed to be making any metres with ball in hand.