With the number of players that you have signed, you may need to swot up on just how the cap works.
Unless some of your players are splitting their income, between work down at the stables and playing RL, you're going to have fun being under the cap.
You may be advised trying to find some additional fans for your shiny new stadium.
Even our perpetually struggling club attracts numbers of fans that Dr K can only dream about.

thanks for that...when folk from within the game start saying its true I believed it ...so glad its not . We need the beard to be Feared

No - because you're confusing what you think with "how it is".

More than you've offered so far yes.

We dont want to sell Danny and he doesn't want to go, however if Dr Moneybags offers a ridiculous fee then yes that may change things. So far however you haven't offered enough for us to consider it worthwhile when taking into account what it would cost the club in terms of support.

Thanks for your input, now do one!!

The only thing I will say on this is that if there is the potential that we may need to sell DK, then given the strength of felling amongst the fans, I would hope that via the ST we would be told how much we needed to raise to avoid the situation and the timescale applicable. This would at least allow us the opportunity to try and do something about it.

A good suggestion but it would be a waste of time. The fans have spoken. Why should they fork out to keep the better players at the club?!

I see your point, but I for one would at least want to know I had the opportunity to contribute and stop it happening and am sure others would do too if they could. It would also give agent xiii chance to do something positive!

Don't know where I heard this one but I think we could put £1 on the entrance fee in order to ........

Apologies for being facetious. It is a good point and there will be many who would contribute but to raise £100k + would be a huge order when many won't (not including the people who can't) pay for a season ticket to keep the squad broadly intact.

Khlav

If we could get a straight £100K for DK or better still a little bit more, I think it would make good business sense to sell him on.

In fact I believe all the deals done so far have been very good business if the figures quoted are true.

What worries the hell out of me is that there are no players being signed up. If we start to sign some decent replacements It may get some positivity back into our fanbase,

I guess its a double edged sword for us at the minute.
We are reluctant to sell but until the debt is bridged; signing players will be bloody tricky - and for obvious reasons.
It could be argued that holding onto players is delaying the rebuild, but personaly think its the right thing to do.
Others may disagree of course but i'd prefer us to keep hold of players such as DK as long as possible - if we think that at some point we will reach the tipping point and things will be going back in our favour.
If MC did not think this was going to be the case then you could argue not selling was putting us behind the eight ball for recruiting for next season, so i am assuming this is the case; which is heartening IMO of course.

Agreed, the sooner the better. It may be even more of a reason to cheer England on this weekend if they end up playing France.

agree with you Kinley.

it's OK saying "we can build a team around Kirmond", but keeping Kirmond means it'll be hard to make any signings.... Argh.

I thought him signing a new contract was a shrewd move to inflate his value, although this was just the Hercule Poirot coming out in me