Did not really think much to this guy but i admit he's improved as a player and stopped giving stupid pens away, don't really think we need him TBH.

cack loiner no thanks

Me too.

think he is ok player but FB is not our priority is it?

Don't need a full back, can he play7??

We should look to sign players who are better than what we have. Mathers is a better player than Blaymire and Murphy long term is wing/centre. Therefore we should look to sign him. Personal opinions of players is irrelevant.

any other full backs we could snap up?
while we are at it some additional cover at hooker would be ever so helpful, perhaps swop one of our plentiful supply of scrum halves for them?

Half backs and a hooker is a priority I agree. But no chance of that this season. Just saying that if Kear does stay in charge for next season he has to be ruthless and wield the axe on under performers and dead wood at the club. For me Blaymire is included in this category along with Gleeson, Blanch, Leo-Latu, Bibb and Cooke.

I'd rather have Mathers than hodgson some of you lot are clueless, he's a great fullback and an outstanding player. He'd easily walk into to your team of all stars

How long have we got Magic Millard?

Wire fans starting to sound like whino fans indeed

Actually, I agree with him.



Mathers 2 years ago - wouldn't touch with a barge pole.

Mathers now - far better than anything in our backline currently - at least with ball in hand. He has been both creating and finishing tries - and if we were lucky enough to tempt him (which we won't IMO), then I would be pleased indeed.

Our current backline is the worst performing one since we've been in SL - and just shows ho reliant we've become on the 'kick' to score our tries. We can't create an overlap to save our lives - and if we did, we wouldn't know what to do with it.

Geez - I've never been so close to just walking away from all this crap!