You have a short memory, many years ago RW and many of your fans were cock sure you could build your own stadium, people were even saying Wakey can F off we don't need them.

We are being asked to share with you for a reason can you work out what it is.

To save £20m?

I still believe cas can build the stadium without wakefield.

Some cas fans may have said wakey can foxtrot oscar, as some wakey fans will have said about cas, doesnt mean those people represent there club though does it.

Some wakey fans were cocksure about thornes park too, doesnt make a differance to the present though does it?

We have been asked to share, but no one, for all people may claim, knows what the councils exact reasons are, it could be that the council saw that NM couldnt be finished in time and tried to force wakeys hand.

Whatever happens i hope that wakey can sort something out and stay in super league.

Glasshoughten = Venus Fly Trap.....Beware

From what I have heard / read it seems that planning permission for NM could have been submitted once outline permission was granted and finished for 2012 (government calling in not taken into account). Since it sounds like its the council that has moved the outline planning hearing back I dobut its for that reason.

I would read the statutory statements that are rlListed Hererl, this is why there will have been delays

All trinity fans can do is hope that some way the Newmarket Stadium can get done,hopefully with WMDC backing but if not without them.But all we can do is guess what will happen until there is more information either from Trinity or the Council,until then everyone is going to be going round in circles.

Most sensible thing i've read on this board for weeks, we are just mushrooms.

Chinese whispers eh? Reliable as ever.

The overwhelming view of both polls is that we go to Newmarket.
I know this is not a scientific study carried out by p07034096eople with clipboards but it's still a sizeable majority.
I'll say it again, if we can(and the people at York Court, comm trust etc are all still backing it) then we should push on with Newmarket, we should suggest that if the council can't back both they should back neither, or split what money there is!
I firmly believe that glasshoughton cannot go ahead/as they hope, without us being involved and that is the view of the councillors interested.
I said in a post earlier on that the council would hide behind economic excuses long before this latest setback and they have, what we must do is continue to push on and highlight where ever there are leanings to one club or the other.
What we also need and I'm getting fed up of repeating this, is a strong statement of intent from our people, otherwise it looks like we're dead in the water at a time when a bit of front is needed.

They (Community Trust, WTRLFC & SWAG) have already have made a strong statement of intent on the day all this flared up.

Unlike Richard Wright who has done a complete 'U Turn' from his previous stance when invited to join in with the Community Stadium ... and now thinks sharing is a good idea.

What does that tell you?

RW has always welcomed Wakefield coming to GH. Just not Cas to Wakefield.

Because one would be a ground share and the other one wouldn't??

Richard Wright has welcomed the inquiry, but its findings are not binding and looks to me like a fact finding mission just to see if the council can save cash and drop their involvment in either scheme.

Glasshoughton will be built without Wakey or the council , as will Newmarket, but they are hoping for such an uproar to the sharing crap that they can withdraw any funding/help and blame someone else .

Just remind me again where the money for Glasshoughton is coming from ... and why full planning permission has not been sought so that the work on the stadium can get started.

Our full plans are ready and waiting to go as soon as outline permission is granted.