The ref spoiled the game for me, but he didn't lose it for us. We did that all on our own.

Apparently bjb has a broken nose and loose teeth ,get well soon pal

He's tougher than he looks. Earlier in his career, when we'd loaned him out to London, he received a skull fracture where a piece of bone the size of a 50p was pushed inwards onto his brain (hence the scrum cap, I suspect). It may have dented his head but it didn't dent his confidence.

Daughter was on Twitter last night and apparently someone tweeted that it was just a case of severe bruising and nothing broken ?????

Think it was Chester who said a broken nose and a few loose teeth.

Ukuma Taʻai

rlhttps://www.examiner.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/news/wakefield-coach-chris-chester-angry-12660100rl

Ukuma Ta'ai cited by rfl with early guilty plea available , might get his wrist slapped and told not be a naughty boy .

At this rate we'll lose 20 odd players to concussion and other head injuries while every other SL club will enjoy playing against a weakened opposition as a result of players being banned.

That was a shoulder charge all the live long day; how the referee and both linesmen missed it is an absolute mystery.

Match Review Panel have it as a reckless high tackle - Grade B - 1-2 matches
EGP offered and accepted - 1 match ban

Nice to see they have once again got their Specsavers sponsorship deal working to full effect.

With BJB already held in the tackle, it was an extremely late cowardly shot.
2 matches (1 with the EGP) once again seems lenient for a cheap shot on a Trinity player.

I think that we must be viewed as unimportant by the review panel.
Huddersfield should have been down to 12 players, plus a 2 match ban (minimum) for that attack to the head, mind you, Huddersfield were allowed to do whatever they wanted in the second half with Mr Brough reffing the second 40.

Anyone see the spear tackle on Mcgilvery? Worse than the one in Hull game that got a ban. Agree the ref and officials were dog e and saw nothing!!!

I saw mcgillivray get lifted over horizontal then luckily get levelled back out and land on his back. Maybe somewhat fortuitous he landed that was but penalty for that was correct. Not in a million years was that a card. At least Huddersfield got a penalty for that and a player didn't have to leave the field.

It wasn't smart but i thought that penalty was for lifting for the second man not a spear tackle. Which is what was given and must have been otherwise wakey player would've been up against MRP.

I didn't see a spear tackle, did you?

I said at the time it wasn't above the horizontal. Kirmond was put on report and after review there was clearly no charge to answer.

I also recall Huddersfield do a similar challenge earlier in the match but I don't think that was even penalised.