consult.wakefield.gov.uk/portal/ ... TE-ES-W40A
(the last one in the list)

"[iThe site is in part Grade 3a Agricultural Land Classification, but it can be demonstrated that there is a particular need for the development, that no alternative suitable site of a lower grade is available, and the proposal would not result in the severance, fragmentation or reduction in the size of agricultural holdings, which would prejudice their continuing viability. The proposal is therefore in accordance with Development Policy D 26. Site intersects SFRA Zone 3a but development will either be excluded from these areas, or mitigation measures, approved by the Environment Agency, will be implemented.[/i"

For anyone that was scared this is going to be taken to a public inquiry.....
Rest assured IT WON'T!
The statement also details drainage, traffic and air quality- all of which have had at least 1 study undertaken and received feedback from the appropriate statutory body.

This IMO is the clear sign of support we needed to see from WMDC.

consult.wakefield.gov.uk/portal/ ... TE-ES-W40A
(the last one in the list)

"[iThe site is in part Grade 3a Agricultural Land Classification, but it can be demonstrated that there is a particular need for the development, that no alternative suitable site of a lower grade is available, and the proposal would not result in the severance, fragmentation or reduction in the size of agricultural holdings, which would prejudice their continuing viability. The proposal is therefore in accordance with Development Policy D 26. Site intersects SFRA Zone 3a but development will either be excluded from these areas, or mitigation measures, approved by the Environment Agency, will be implemented.[/i"

For anyone that was scared this is going to be taken to a public inquiry.....
Rest assured IT WON'T!
The statement also details drainage, traffic and air quality- all of which have had at least 1 study undertaken and received feedback from the appropriate statutory body.

This IMO is the clear sign of support we needed to see from WMDC.

We better be!

As soon as we get the outline consent we will be ready to motor. There will be no consultation process like there is in Cas- as had that in DECEMBER!
From what I have been told as soon as we get the nod the full application is ready to be submitted- baring any amendments that are attached to the approval of the application.

www.lrdlimited.co.uk/case_studie ... liery.html

The land reclamation took place in 1998 on the stadium site so one would assume that work would begin on there straight away, with the drainage and road works taking place around the site at the same time.
The "arms race" will really kick up a gear then!

We better be!

As soon as we get the outline consent we will be ready to motor. There will be no consultation process like there is in Cas- as had that in DECEMBER!
From what I have been told as soon as we get the nod the full application is ready to be submitted- baring any amendments that are attached to the approval of the application.

www.lrdlimited.co.uk/case_studie ... liery.html

The land reclamation took place in 1998 on the stadium site so one would assume that work would begin on there straight away, with the drainage and road works taking place around the site at the same time.
The "arms race" will really kick up a gear then!

consult.wakefield.gov.uk/portal/ ... section_31

"[iPolicy YH9 in draft new RSS reinforces national guidance that the general extent of the Green Belts in the region should not be changed. However, it also indicates that localised reviews may be necessary in some places to deliver the Core Approach. In the case of parts of West Yorkshire it indicates a strategic review may be required to deliver longer term housing growth. The Core Strategy is consistent with this policy. All land currently in the Green Belt in Wakefield District serves a specific purpose and there is no need for a general review of the boundary. Any strategic review of the Green Belt in parts of West Yorkshire will inform options for delivering housing growth beyond 2021. It's timing and conclusions may require an early review of the Core Strategy and/or Site Specific Proposals documents. =#FF4000In the meantime only in exceptional circumstances will a localised review of the Green Belt be carried out when a relevant LDF document is prepared or reviewed. Such circumstances could be an over-riding need to accommodate development of the following types which can not be met elsewhere and where Green Belt land offers the most sustainable option:

regeneration schemes which bring community benefits;[/i

consult.wakefield.gov.uk/portal/ ... section_31

"[iPolicy YH9 in draft new RSS reinforces national guidance that the general extent of the Green Belts in the region should not be changed. However, it also indicates that localised reviews may be necessary in some places to deliver the Core Approach. In the case of parts of West Yorkshire it indicates a strategic review may be required to deliver longer term housing growth. The Core Strategy is consistent with this policy. All land currently in the Green Belt in Wakefield District serves a specific purpose and there is no need for a general review of the boundary. Any strategic review of the Green Belt in parts of West Yorkshire will inform options for delivering housing growth beyond 2021. It's timing and conclusions may require an early review of the Core Strategy and/or Site Specific Proposals documents. =#FF4000In the meantime only in exceptional circumstances will a localised review of the Green Belt be carried out when a relevant LDF document is prepared or reviewed. Such circumstances could be an over-riding need to accommodate development of the following types which can not be met elsewhere and where Green Belt land offers the most sustainable option:

regeneration schemes which bring community benefits;[/i