Think it was more a joke aimed at Leeds players dislike of Thackray.

Chill man.

Thanks Wildthing, your are indeed correct about the intentions of my post.

Gotcha - 3 out of 5 would constitute [imost[/i, if we wanted to get pedantic though and [ioffences[/i suggests different incidents. Is your name Ashley BTW??? How is it in Oz?

does anybody know what time will the decision be announced?

You would have thought it would be updated by now

the hearing is at 5pm l think

1 match:



It'll be interesting to see how many other players get banned for punching this season...

Its a level playing field they keep telling us, not when it comes to wakefield its not

What an absolute joke the RFL panel are. One match for a bit of argy-bargy that you see week in week out. Yellows each would have done especially with the game being early season and niggly throughout. Yet Crusaders player Adam Peek, (maliciously in my opinion) attacks the head of Delaney with his elbow splitting his head open and gets nothing except a caution. Shocking.

We will never win mate, its wakefield

The red cards were probably fair. But the aftermath punishment doesn't add. Surely use the use of head warrants more of a ban than punching. The only thing that could made this outcome could have been that LMS has a very clean discilinary record before this incident. It could be that they looked at Richards record and thought it was fair. I don't always think there is consitancy when it comes to the panel.

Although at the game I didn't see what happened, I did see the Super League show.With LMS not having an exemplary disciplinary record and appearing to be the most aggressive,how can there be such a disparity in the fines ?

The biff is officially over. A dark day indeed.