What I dont get is if Pearson has all the evidence of the Brisco to Leeds fiasco why are we not seeing Leeds/Kath/Agar etc being hauled before the courts and Redhall ?
If you were in his position with that you would be looking to get compensation and it never happening again.Not spouting to a set of fans and doing your case harm by doing so.

the most frustrating thing about Briscoe from a Wakefield point of view is that he was another young player in the Wakefield system that was unable to be retained.

Players like Milner, Smith, Hampshire, holmes, etc all gone. I hope this is a priority of mr glover to address as the real young quality is in the catchment area.

Pearson, i believe has reported them to the relevant bodies.The likelihood of Kath or even Gary being welcomed into the boardroom by adam are very slim!

Think you will find Briscoe was signed by Leeds from Hull not Wakey but RA taking the flack from FC fans HTH

I think you will find Briscoe was brought through the Scholarship at Wakefield, prior to signing for Hull. I'm not that sad to hth.

I love the way you talk about these people as if they're all personal acquaintances - it's quite sweet, in a slightly stalkerish kind of way.

In other news - a story in the Hull local rag suggests that the RFL will take no further action against the club. If true, the RFL proves itself to be spineless and hypocritical; Fatty Woods stated publicly the other day that the club had brought the game into disrepute - despite that, they let UKAD do their dirty work and take no action themselves? At best, that shows profound weakness at the RFL.

A few clubs, not least Cas, will have a right to feel profoundly aggrieved; they were fined 40 grand for the actions of a few fans that was outside their control, whereas Hull suffer no penalty for the actions of 3 of their paid officers that was very much within their control. It's potical.

I did mention this earlier in the thread and TBH if I was a Cas supporter I'd be shouting for action once again the RFL show their inconsistency in dealing with the running of the game, it was the RFL's words "Bringing the Game of RL in to disrepute" hypocritical IMHO

Apoligies if thats the case but he left Hull for Leeds

I can assure you it is the case I had the fortune to coach him in that system for a couple of years. No need to apologise by the way.

All I was trying to say there is a great debate going on about him moving from Hull to Leeds and in my opinion the real debate should be why was he allowed to leave Wakefield so easily. I appreciate money was a factor but given where Wakefield are now with a 3 year security blanket it's time to give a bit more to the kids that have been allowed to walk without too much of a fight.

In fairness, that's only coming from certain obsessed Hull fans who can't let go of their Agar fatwa, although admittedly, it's being fuelled by the daft ranting of their new owner; if I were RA, I'd be having a word with my legal bods.

The club 1873 scheme will hopefully help us keep more of our promising youngsters

If I were Agar, I'd just get on with guiding us to a mid-table finish, the first step in a rebirth, and deal with any anti-Hull feeling the same way Kear did: beat them on his first return there.