Not for Leyth he won't, we're covered for that position, but yes he'll be versatile for us.

I like Moore when he has his head screwed on, but he and Gareth Hock in the same team, that'll be a nuclear bomb waiting to happen.

If he's broke a coppers wrist, even if it was in a struggle, he's doing time mate. Something similar happened to someone I knew years ago.

That's why I said 'If'.....I have also not named anyone responsible or connected unlike a number of other posters or the media so I think I'm safe.

Wasn't sure on hock when we signed him but is a great bloke these days, Scotty has always been a sandwich short of a picnic and 9 is a position we are not exposed in.

Might end up in Strangeways, if true.

Already considered and no he wont play 9.

Atomic
If you don't have have a link a link to a report, don't post accusations. POPTART

Have you had a few bills for the recharge on a taser yourself fella?

We've already got 3 good 9's for next season. You can keep him

I imagine we won't be.

That would be an utter travesty for our game, to take such a rarity as a young British H/B and turn him into a 9 would be pathetic even for the most dullard British coach or second rate Aussies of whick our game is festooned. All because they couldn't be bothered to develop him and just wanted a quick fix and I include the sainted Powell in that. If we did get Hampshire it would be move over Miller for me because Miller is not in the same class in terms of a complete game.

I rate Moore and at this late date we won't replace him with anyone as good IMHO. However in the British game Hookers are one of our better products and I'm sure we could find more than adequate in the Championship or the 'A' teams of other clubs. Or even more radical we could put our faith in young Mouls partnered with Finn, wow.

However back to the point, Hampshire to 9 would be a disgrace same as putting him at FB was.

So I take it that was a no then. I wasn't thinking of is as being permanent. Both Miller and Williams are off contract at the end of the year. Plus come the end of next season, a more natural quality 9 could be available.

There has been a lot of players, who in their younger stages of their careers play out of position. Didnt Dave Topliss and Roger Millward play some of their games early in their careers on the wing? In the long run, it wasn't a travesty to our game.

I have no issues with Moules playing 9 for us, but not sure if his body would be up to it week in week out yest. Just look how Jowitt was by then end of the season.

I do feel that Finn's distribution would be too slow.

Totally agree with all that. We are a club that Hampshire would love to play at and we are also the club that would give him a chance and develop his talent to be a true No6. It would be an ideal match for both parties.

However I heard we made him a derisory offer and were not that interested in taking him on board.
Could internal politics be involved ? i'm sure you know enough to work that one out.