FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
  
FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Probiz Super League
71 posts in 6 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach5777
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
46978_1481681744.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_46978.jpg



I couldn't give a monkeys who sponsors SL but lets be honest unless your a hardcore fan or at least follow the game, you wouldn't have the foggiest who Probiz is, just gives the impression imo that Super League is small fry.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach5777
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
46978_1481681744.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_46978.jpg



Quote: mattj13 "Im not sure what your point is...? You don't think Probiz are a big enough name for SL or Probiz are somehow dodgy?

Maybe the RFL should have asked Glover to consider 'West Yorkshire Windows Super League'?'"


Not really, with him owning a SL team and all that.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2990
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Aug 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: Tricky2309 "In your opinion its a load of rubbish, but I can assure you it has nothing to do with Probiz being your main sponsor. The term tax efficiency was used in the loosest form, as it would appear to me that they enable suitably wealthy people to avoid paying their dues by exploiting loopholes in the system. Nothing illegal in that I am sure you will say, but in the current economic climate when the vast majority of people are struggling, there is something morally not right about a company who makes its money in this fashion - which ultimately means the likes of you and me end up paying more to bridge the shortfall.'"


Nothing immoral at all.
I would imagine a good percentage of supporters are self employed or directors of businesses and use the services of an accountant and the accountant will ensure they are tax efficient.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1380
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2024Oct 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
16086_1706206167.jpg
[color=#0000FF:2dzs77ey]Always read the small print[/color:2dzs77ey]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_16086.jpg



Quote: jungle man "it's simply down to the fact that he's the main sponsor of CTRLFC. Pathetic really!!!'"

chillpill.gif
Why do you think it would be a Castleford thing? Get a grip you imbecile, Probiz do sponsor other clubs in the RFL, such as Wigan where they are an associate (means not the main) sponsor and at Halifax (you remember them, the club that bailed you out last season when your clueless club turned up for a televised game with the wrong kit) where Probiz are the main sponsor. So as you can see it is not likely to be a CTRLFC thing at all.

Going back to the main point of the thread a sponsor is a sponsor. If they are prepared to money in then it should be good enough for us. Even though some people still don't get it as a governing body the RFL are not in a position to be beating potentially better sponsors off with a stick. Just as long as there is no conflict of interest as defined by the RFL rules then I don't see the problem.

RankPostsTeam
International Star808No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 201113 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2013Aug 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
61486_1316533274.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_61486.jpg



Quote: Gronk! "
Quote: Gronk! "The guy seems good at throwing his money around but no one seems to know where it comes from. Was it Notts county or forest who had a simillar benefactor a few years back and it all fell down like a pack of cards.'"


Apart from it's readily available how he got his wealth, how much he's worth and why he's throwing money at sports.

PROBIZ will have offered the most money for the sponsorship, so there's no problems with them being the sponsor of the league.'"



I'd stick to your own forum pal, you are regarded as a joke in here. I suppose this is some more inside info that you have aqquired.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4163
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2021Oct 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
42850_1303637344.jpg
WE ARE WAKEFIELD, WITHOUT THE RICHARDSONS’ WE ARE STRONGER:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_42850.jpg



Quote: TURFEDOUT "
Quote: TURFEDOUT "In your opinion its a load of rubbish, but I can assure you it has nothing to do with Probiz being your main sponsor. The term tax efficiency was used in the loosest form, as it would appear to me that they enable suitably wealthy people to avoid paying their dues by exploiting loopholes in the system. Nothing illegal in that I am sure you will say, but in the current economic climate when the vast majority of people are struggling, there is something morally not right about a company who makes its money in this fashion - which ultimately means the likes of you and me end up paying more to bridge the shortfall.'"


Nothing immoral at all.
I would imagine a good percentage of supporters are self employed or directors of businesses and use the services of an accountant and the accountant will ensure they are tax efficient.'"


Thats your opinion and your entitled to it. As I said I used the phrase tax efficient in the loosest form as I suspect "avoidance" is more the case.

As someone who pays a considerable amount of my wages out in various forms of tax, I personally resent the fact that their are significantly wealthier people out there then me, who pay far less as a proportion of their income in taxes because they have schemes available to them to exploit loopholes and I also resent the companies who provide them with the vehicles to do the same.

These schemes in reality only work for those in a certain position and IMO are therefore by their nature divisive, because the shortfall in taxes collected from those who participate in such schemes has to be made up somewhere else (eg the average working person paying more in taxes or people in the public sector losing their jobs).

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4163
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2021Oct 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
42850_1303637344.jpg
WE ARE WAKEFIELD, WITHOUT THE RICHARDSONS’ WE ARE STRONGER:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_42850.jpg



Quote: mattj13 "
Quote: mattj13 "Surely the RFL have to consider more than just the money on offer when selecting a sponsor?'"


Im not sure what your point is...? You don't think Probiz are a big enough name for SL or Probiz are somehow dodgy?

Maybe the RFL should have asked Glover to consider 'West Yorkshire Windows Super League'?'"


My point was that you should look to align the activities of your sponsors with the values of you as an organisation and those of your client base. Not questioning whether they are big enough but whether they are the "right fit".

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2990
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Aug 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: Tricky2309 "
Quote: Tricky2309 "
Quote: Tricky2309 "In your opinion its a load of rubbish, but I can assure you it has nothing to do with Probiz being your main sponsor. The term tax efficiency was used in the loosest form, as it would appear to me that they enable suitably wealthy people to avoid paying their dues by exploiting loopholes in the system. Nothing illegal in that I am sure you will say, but in the current economic climate when the vast majority of people are struggling, there is something morally not right about a company who makes its money in this fashion - which ultimately means the likes of you and me end up paying more to bridge the shortfall.'"


Nothing immoral at all.
I would imagine a good percentage of supporters are self employed or directors of businesses and use the services of an accountant and the accountant will ensure they are tax efficient.'"


Thats your opinion and your entitled to it. As I said I used the phrase tax efficient in the loosest form as I suspect "avoidance" is more the case.

As someone who pays a considerable amount of my wages out in various forms of tax, I personally resent the fact that their are significantly wealthier people out there then me, who pay far less as a proportion of their income in taxes because they have schemes available to them to exploit loopholes and I also resent the companies who provide them with the vehicles to do the same.

These schemes in reality only work for those in a certain position and IMO are therefore by their nature divisive, because the shortfall in taxes collected from those who participate in such schemes has to be made up somewhere else (eg the average working person paying more in taxes or people in the public sector losing their jobs).'"


That reads like you are just miffed that you yourself cant do it.

So if you had the opportunity to legally retain more of your earned income you wouldnt take it?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4163
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2021Oct 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
42850_1303637344.jpg
WE ARE WAKEFIELD, WITHOUT THE RICHARDSONS’ WE ARE STRONGER:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_42850.jpg



Quote: TURFEDOUT "
Quote: TURFEDOUT "
Quote: TURFEDOUT "
Quote: TURFEDOUT "In your opinion its a load of rubbish, but I can assure you it has nothing to do with Probiz being your main sponsor. The term tax efficiency was used in the loosest form, as it would appear to me that they enable suitably wealthy people to avoid paying their dues by exploiting loopholes in the system. Nothing illegal in that I am sure you will say, but in the current economic climate when the vast majority of people are struggling, there is something morally not right about a company who makes its money in this fashion - which ultimately means the likes of you and me end up paying more to bridge the shortfall.'"


Nothing immoral at all.
I would imagine a good percentage of supporters are self employed or directors of businesses and use the services of an accountant and the accountant will ensure they are tax efficient.'"


Thats your opinion and your entitled to it. As I said I used the phrase tax efficient in the loosest form as I suspect "avoidance" is more the case.

As someone who pays a considerable amount of my wages out in various forms of tax, I personally resent the fact that their are significantly wealthier people out there then me, who pay far less as a proportion of their income in taxes because they have schemes available to them to exploit loopholes and I also resent the companies who provide them with the vehicles to do the same.

These schemes in reality only work for those in a certain position and IMO are therefore by their nature divisive, because the shortfall in taxes collected from those who participate in such schemes has to be made up somewhere else (eg the average working person paying more in taxes or people in the public sector losing their jobs).'"


That reads like you are just miffed that you yourself cant do it.

So if you had the opportunity to legally retain more of your earned income you wouldnt take it?'"


The point I have made has nothing to do with me being miffed about not being able to do it myself. As I have said, the fact that it is only available to people in a certain position makes it divisive. I don't mind paying a fair contribution to the system, my problem being that such schemes prevent this from being the case and average working joes like me are the easy option to make up the shortfall and are likely to be squeezed further as unemployment and therefore the benefit bill continues to rise.

I perhaps should have added in my initial response that the fact the government fail to close some of these loopholes is also part of the problem, but they seem scared by the threats from the mega wealthy to move abroad if the tax regime is tightened up.

As for your second point, IMO the situation is similar to that lawyer who gets off all the celebs from driving offences by exploiting flaws in the process. They have committed the offences and it is therefore IMO morally wrong that they get off purely because of who they can afford to represent them.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach15521
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2020May 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
50722_1319672516.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50722.jpg



I'm not overly concerned at the nature of his business - I just don't like his badly-worded, daft sounding eulogies to himself, proclaiming his plans to unleash RL on the Middle East and make <insert whichever club he's talking about that day> into global brands.

He comes across as a self-aggrandizing ego-maniac, with a propensity to talk utter ballcocks - his performance on the field prior to our match against them last season was positively cringeworthy; I felt sorry for Adrian Vowles, who must have wanted to disappear up his own arris.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2990
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Aug 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: Tricky2309 "
Quote: Tricky2309 "
Quote: Tricky2309 "
Quote: Tricky2309 "
Quote: Tricky2309 "In your opinion its a load of rubbish, but I can assure you it has nothing to do with Probiz being your main sponsor. The term tax efficiency was used in the loosest form, as it would appear to me that they enable suitably wealthy people to avoid paying their dues by exploiting loopholes in the system. Nothing illegal in that I am sure you will say, but in the current economic climate when the vast majority of people are struggling, there is something morally not right about a company who makes its money in this fashion - which ultimately means the likes of you and me end up paying more to bridge the shortfall.'"


Nothing immoral at all.
I would imagine a good percentage of supporters are self employed or directors of businesses and use the services of an accountant and the accountant will ensure they are tax efficient.'"


Thats your opinion and your entitled to it. As I said I used the phrase tax efficient in the loosest form as I suspect "avoidance" is more the case.

As someone who pays a considerable amount of my wages out in various forms of tax, I personally resent the fact that their are significantly wealthier people out there then me, who pay far less as a proportion of their income in taxes because they have schemes available to them to exploit loopholes and I also resent the companies who provide them with the vehicles to do the same.

These schemes in reality only work for those in a certain position and IMO are therefore by their nature divisive, because the shortfall in taxes collected from those who participate in such schemes has to be made up somewhere else (eg the average working person paying more in taxes or people in the public sector losing their jobs).'"


That reads like you are just miffed that you yourself cant do it.

So if you had the opportunity to legally retain more of your earned income you wouldnt take it?'"


The point I have made has nothing to do with me being miffed about not being able to do it myself. As I have said, the fact that it is only available to people in a certain position makes it divisive. I don't mind paying a fair contribution to the system, my problem being that such schemes prevent this from being the case and average working joes like me are the easy option to make up the shortfall and are likely to be squeezed further as unemployment and therefore the benefit bill continues to rise.

I perhaps should have added in my initial response that the fact the government fail to close some of these loopholes is also part of the problem, but they seem scared by the threats from the mega wealthy to move abroad if the tax regime is tightened up.

As for your second point, IMO the situation is similar to that lawyer who gets off all the celebs from driving offences by exploiting flaws in the process. They have committed the offences and it is therefore IMO morally wrong that they get off purely because of who they can afford to represent them.'"


The second point required a simple yes or no answer.

We are clearly not going to agree.

However,the schemes(which is probably the wrong way of describing most of them) are available to many people outside of the mega rich and celebs.It just comes down to a personal choice of if you want to take the associated gambles that come with reducing your tax bill.
eg,people switching from employed status to becoming a partner in an LLP,essentially making them self employed,Tax gains to be had,but lose your employment rights.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach15521
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2020May 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
50722_1319672516.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50722.jpg



Quote: TURFEDOUT "However,the schemes(which is probably the wrong way of describing most of them) are available to many people outside of the mega rich and celebs.It just comes down to a personal choice of if you want to take the associated gambles that come with reducing your tax bill.
eg,people switching from employed status to becoming a partner in an LLP,essentially making them self employed,Tax gains to be had,but lose your employment rights.'"


It doesn't really come down to a personal choice though does it?

For example, public sector employees can't ask their employer to take them off the books and retain their services as consultants going forward; neither can the vast majority of people who work for large organisations.

I understand your position, but I think your simplifying the situation to an unreasonable degree.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2990
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Aug 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: bren2k "
Quote: bren2k "However,the schemes(which is probably the wrong way of describing most of them) are available to many people outside of the mega rich and celebs.It just comes down to a personal choice of if you want to take the associated gambles that come with reducing your tax bill.
eg,people switching from employed status to becoming a partner in an LLP,essentially making them self employed,Tax gains to be had,but lose your employment rights.'"


It doesn't really come down to a personal choice though does it?

For example, public sector employees can't ask their employer to take them off the books and retain their services as consultants going forward; neither can the vast majority of people who work for large organisations.

I understand your position, but I think your simplifying the situation to an unreasonable degree.'"


Which is why i said many people, not all.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4163
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2021Oct 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
42850_1303637344.jpg
WE ARE WAKEFIELD, WITHOUT THE RICHARDSONS’ WE ARE STRONGER:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_42850.jpg



Turfedout, your right that overall on this topic we won't agree, but no harm in some good old fashioned and reasonable debate.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2990
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Aug 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: Tricky2309 "Turfedout, your right that overall on this topic we won't agree, but no harm in some good old fashioned and reasonable debate.'"


LOL.Happy New Year Tricky!!!

71 posts in 6 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing
71 posts in 6 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


2.1201171875:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
32m
Pre Season - 2025
giddyupoldfe
119
Recent
Memorable Games
giddyupoldfe
7
Recent
Squad 2025
the fax in a
24
Recent
BORED The Band Name Game
Cokey
63004
Recent
England vs Samoa
CM Punk
130
Recent
2025 Season tickets
AgbriggAmble
174
Recent
Rumours thread
Trojan Horse
2503
Recent
Transfer Talk V5
christopher
423
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
4m
The Brick Stadium ownership update
Itchy Arsena
5
5m
BORED The Band Name Game
Cokey
63004
5m
Recruitment rumours and links
karetaker
3508
5m
2025 Season tickets
AgbriggAmble
174
9m
Ground Improvements
Khlav Kalash
121
10m
Planning for next season
leyther
167
11m
England vs Samoa
CM Punk
130
12m
Rhinos Ladies
The Biffs Ba
6
14m
2024 l Academy Scholarship & Reserves News
Ex-Swarcliff
223
15m
Dons Squad 2025
Jemmo
8
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
The Brick Stadium ownership update
Itchy Arsena
5
TODAY
Rhinos Ladies
The Biffs Ba
6
TODAY
Squad contract dates
Spookisback
6
TODAY
Paladin Sports
Deadcowboys1
4
TODAY
Magic Weekend
Wollo-Wollo-
2
TODAY
War of the Roses
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Dual Reg
PopTart
2
TODAY
Vagana
Scarlet Pimp
10
TODAY
2025 Kit
Wigan Bull
6
TODAY
2025 merchandise
18th Man
12
TODAY
NBR Does Smithers have a hangover
Smithers99
7
TODAY
Its all gone a bit quiet
BigTime
17
TODAY
England Beat Samoa To Take Test Series
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
McMeekan
Trojan Horse
13
TODAY
Englands Women Demolish The Welsh
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Lee Kershaw
Big lads mat
9
TODAY
2025 Shirt
The Whiffy K
11
TODAY
Home Shirt 2025
MattyB
1
TODAY
Uele contract extension
Khlav Kalash
5
TODAY
Squad for Match 2 v Samoa
rubber ducki
6
TODAY
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 2
Boss Hog
11
TODAY
Sky tv deals
karetaker
7
TODAY
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 1
Fantastic Mr
29
TODAY
New Kit
karetaker
62
TODAY
Memorable Games
giddyupoldfe
7
TODAY
Hybrid rugby
moto748
11
TODAY
Pre Season - 2025
giddyupoldfe
119
TODAY
England v Australia
karetaker
32
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
580
England's Women Demolish The W..
527
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
826
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
634
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
920
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1414
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
1646
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
1917
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1502
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
1765
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2132
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
1700
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
1784
Hull KR Survive Warrington Fig..
1914
Warrington Wolves Break Saints..
2100
POSTSONLINEREGISTRATIONSRECORD
19.64M 1,257 80,15414,103
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.

When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
RLFANS Match Centre
There are currently no matches to display.
Matches on TV
Sat 2nd Nov
MINT2024 3 England M34-16Samoa M
WINT2024 2 ENGLAND W82-0WALES W
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wigan 29 768 338 430 48
Hull KR 29 731 344 387 44
Warrington 29 769 351 418 42
Leigh 29 580 442 138 33
Salford 28 556 561 -5 32
St.Helens 28 618 411 207 30
 
Catalans 27 475 427 48 30
Leeds 27 530 488 42 28
Huddersfield 27 468 658 -190 20
Castleford 27 425 735 -310 15
Hull FC 27 328 894 -566 6
LondonB 27 317 916 -599 6
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1
 PLDFADIFFPTS
Wakefield 27 1032 275 757 52
Toulouse 26 765 388 377 37
Bradford 28 723 420 303 36
York 29 695 501 194 32
Widnes 27 561 502 59 29
Featherstone 27 634 525 109 28
 
Sheffield 26 626 526 100 28
Doncaster 26 498 619 -121 25
Halifax 26 509 650 -141 22
Batley 26 422 591 -169 22
Swinton 28 484 676 -192 20
Barrow 25 442 720 -278 19
Whitehaven 25 437 826 -389 18
Dewsbury 27 348 879 -531 4
Hunslet 1 6 10 -4 0
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
32m
Pre Season - 2025
giddyupoldfe
119
Recent
Memorable Games
giddyupoldfe
7
Recent
Squad 2025
the fax in a
24
Recent
BORED The Band Name Game
Cokey
63004
Recent
England vs Samoa
CM Punk
130
Recent
2025 Season tickets
AgbriggAmble
174
Recent
Rumours thread
Trojan Horse
2503
Recent
Transfer Talk V5
christopher
423
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
4m
The Brick Stadium ownership update
Itchy Arsena
5
5m
BORED The Band Name Game
Cokey
63004
5m
Recruitment rumours and links
karetaker
3508
5m
2025 Season tickets
AgbriggAmble
174
9m
Ground Improvements
Khlav Kalash
121
10m
Planning for next season
leyther
167
11m
England vs Samoa
CM Punk
130
12m
Rhinos Ladies
The Biffs Ba
6
14m
2024 l Academy Scholarship & Reserves News
Ex-Swarcliff
223
15m
Dons Squad 2025
Jemmo
8
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
The Brick Stadium ownership update
Itchy Arsena
5
TODAY
Rhinos Ladies
The Biffs Ba
6
TODAY
Squad contract dates
Spookisback
6
TODAY
Paladin Sports
Deadcowboys1
4
TODAY
Magic Weekend
Wollo-Wollo-
2
TODAY
War of the Roses
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Dual Reg
PopTart
2
TODAY
Vagana
Scarlet Pimp
10
TODAY
2025 Kit
Wigan Bull
6
TODAY
2025 merchandise
18th Man
12
TODAY
NBR Does Smithers have a hangover
Smithers99
7
TODAY
Its all gone a bit quiet
BigTime
17
TODAY
England Beat Samoa To Take Test Series
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
McMeekan
Trojan Horse
13
TODAY
Englands Women Demolish The Welsh
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Lee Kershaw
Big lads mat
9
TODAY
2025 Shirt
The Whiffy K
11
TODAY
Home Shirt 2025
MattyB
1
TODAY
Uele contract extension
Khlav Kalash
5
TODAY
Squad for Match 2 v Samoa
rubber ducki
6
TODAY
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 2
Boss Hog
11
TODAY
Sky tv deals
karetaker
7
TODAY
2024/25 out of season mind occupier 1
Fantastic Mr
29
TODAY
New Kit
karetaker
62
TODAY
Memorable Games
giddyupoldfe
7
TODAY
Hybrid rugby
moto748
11
TODAY
Pre Season - 2025
giddyupoldfe
119
TODAY
England v Australia
karetaker
32
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
580
England's Women Demolish The W..
527
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
826
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
634
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
920
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
1414
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
1646
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
1917
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
1502
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
1765
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2132
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
1700
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
1784
Hull KR Survive Warrington Fig..
1914
Warrington Wolves Break Saints..
2100


Visit the RLFANS.COM SHOP
for more merchandise!