Ones a motoring offense,the other is a criminal offense.Do you just think your club can sweep the latter under the carpet?

And what makes you think the club want to sweep it under the carpet? From what. I see, Michael Carter and Chris Bretherton seem totally honourable and work in a transparent sort of way. How many clubs would ban two of their "best" players before the million pound game?

Banning players internally for off-field issues,doesn't equate to criminal charges,as a club you support them all.Right or wrong.

This scenario,like it or not,is out of the Clubs control.

Where have the Club swept it under the carpet exactly? and secondly where has anyone said that what Moore did is in the Clubs control. Carter can't exactly tell the courts to sod off and drop any charges can he. All he can do his what he has said and do a Club investigation. Who knows what Moore's version of events is. Just because the Police charge you with something doesn't make it fact does it. Otherwise each charge would lead to a prosecution.

Ateotd all that's happened so far is that he's answered his bail and he's been re-bailed to come back in March. He hasn't been found guilty of anything, in fact the only report of the incident is from the paper and what he could get charged with at Court. Up till his bail been put back, we all thought he was going for the season but with him not going back till March and for him then to potentially go through the Court process (Mag to Crown), it looks like he might be here for quite some time, which could be near the end of the season.

I'm honestly not sure what points your here to make and tbh you just seem to be on a bit of a wum. Do you think we should just try to sack him and go with the guilty until proven innocent scenario? Ban him and pay his wages till he's found guilty/not guilty? Or while we're paying the player, we should be able to play him, until the Court decides otherwise?

Just wondering, were you all over the Hul KR board when Adam Walker got charged with two offences of attempting to engage in sexual activity with a child. While Hull KR continued to play and support him through it and then the charges end up being dismissed. Or is it just the Moore case you're interest in?
.

It'll all come out in the wash.

There is some rubbish posted on this site about this issue. No one knows what happened to Moore but we will in due course through the courts. If a broken wrist has occurred and a Taser has been deployed then there has been a significant struggle.
CPS prosecute in this century not the police so comments earlier carry no substance. As for Moore being a future captain u need your head testing. .

Yes because in my 3 decades of experience they don't...I don't wish to add anything further as its off topic.

We've been off topic for ages with this Moore thing tbh. I'll just leave this, in my similar experience they do look at any offense against a Police Office very seriously (ABH, GBH, Murder), much more than the average guy on the street. i''ll give an example , when I was a teenager up town, a friend with no previous, he got into a back and forth with a few lads and the Police ran in behind him, he didn't see them and ended up elbowing a Cop in the nose by accident but broke it. The lad got sent to a YOP for 12 months for it. I went to watch his hearing and the Court were very clear that they did not like an assault on a police officer and came down heavily on him for it.

Anyway back on topic.

Why do some people still think he's coming back? You've got a guy posting in here, who's son is in the squad, saying there's no chance of him coming back. Doesn't take a genius to figure it out even if the club can't comment publicly.

Yes they are well known in the courts for looking after our boys in blue. www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nor ... e-12270239

Yes they are well known in the courts for looking after our boys in blue. www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/nor ... e-12270239

Aye that does my 3 decades of policing experience...

Best squad built for years....

Anyway back off topic - you need to know that CPS are NOT the court. CPS are agents who prosecute cases on behalf of the police but they don't decide sentence - the court do that. I also second a previous comment from an earlier post- from four decades of experience - they certainly do NOT favour the police.

Yes, we are WAY off topic now.
Let's get back on topic please.