Can TRB tell us what " no brainer " deal was offered ? Plus TRB did say that they were meeting yc on a weekly basis ,surely something thing was positive ,if not let's hear the truth now !!

There is a Unilateral Undertaking in place. It is a Unilateral Undertaking persuant to Section 106 of The Town & Country Planning Act 1990 so you can say what you want but it is a 106 Agreement.

The Council are right, they did not sign the UU because it is what it says it is, a UU. They are however, despite their denials PARTY to the UU because the UU is GIVEN by Yorkcourt TO Wakefield MDC and as Planning Authority the Council have the responsibility for enforcing the UU. The Club and Stadium Trust are NOT party to the UU so cannot enforce it.

As Slugger has said it is a CONTRACT to which the Council are a party and they seem to be struggling with the basics of The Law of Contract.

By the way for the benefit of the Council its not the "Wildcats Stadium" it is a Community Stadium for the citizens of Wakefield of which 15,000 of them signed a petition in support.

To Cosmic Cat and everyone on on here we share your frustration, just think how we feel, but I would hope that there will be a statement in the next few weeks because I think we owe it to ourselves and yourselves to explain the situation.

Indeed - that ship sailed some time ago; the time to use PR to apply pressure to YC was early doors - now they've got Council backing, a site that is already making money, and a precedent set by the Council to allow them to develop it further. Why on earth would they give away millions of quid if they don't have to?

We've been played - again.

The idea against a public/viral campaign exposing the corrupt/unfair nature of how we've been treated in all this, was that negotiations were still on going and so we didn't want to rock the boat, as far as I'm aware. Now hopes of negotiations have all but faded, surely if time for us to get this plastered all over the internet and anywhere else with the details so people can see for themselves. Even if it changes nothing, at least it exposes the corrupt nature of certain governing bodies.

Just opened your link Jizzer. The headline was "WAKEFIELD DISTRICT COUNCIL- WORKING FOR YOU". What a laugh. Can we get them under the Trades Description Act?

The council have not signed a 106 agreement. However, they are party to it as it is written to them as a Unilateral Undertaking but the Developer. A UU is covered by section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act. They are building their defence!

Can someone explain to me how we would be better off moving to Dewsbury because I am struggling to understand the rationale.

I'm presuming because the RFL are saying that we can't stay at Belle Vue and remain in the top flight as there are no signs of progress after many years of promises that they were just around the corner.

Still waiting for a statement on thornes park

Anyone heard plans of our new stadium on Castle Grove Park?

www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... 844&page=2 some interesting but depressing comments here

www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... 844&page=2 some interesting but depressing comments here

No because there aren't any.

Never gunna happen. You thought the local public outcry for NM was intense, imagine it 10 fold.

Li0nhead comment is about the truth of it all, as unbelievably sad as it is. With no plan in the pipelines as far as Stadia for Trinity, it will be a slow death at Dewsbury......and it was looking all so promising this season as well up to a few days ago.