Can I just clarify......why would the players be confused because he changed the team?
Both Sammut and Sykes have played the positions they were allocated.

Not one player finished without a missed tackle. I reckon they knew what to do there.

As I've said, Agar has to take some responsibility as made the changes but nothing he changed meant the players should perform so badly.

agree completely. feel sorry for my boss mr brown. we have been at the ground for the last 2 weeks , ripped out all the foundations on one stand and renewed them. barrowed all the muck out and all the concrete in. set all the bolts. hard enough for us to do but he is the guy that paid us and as a wakey fan I thought after the game yesterday mr b will be gutted. so many people putting so much effort in to be let down so badly by the team you have paid your hard earned to support. no effort , no aggression. our pack got absolutely walked over. they were a joke.
defence was absolutely abysmal. the whole thing was a disgrace. if I had my way and if we do the bases on the north stand, I would send that 17 to do all the barrowing and labouring, show them how the other half live and what others are doing on their behalf.
the only 2 that I would leave out would be reece lyne. taulima tautai

Go to the games hard working people paid plenty to watch that tripe Sunday.

Why do you assume I didn't go to the game and spend my hard earned money. The fact over the many years I have watched Wakefield I have seen much worse performances. I guess I am more pragmatic than some on here but you should never mistake this for a desire not to see Wakefield win every game.
The arguments about Agar's success being based on 7 games could equally apply to the period Kear was in charge, the run we had when Harbin coached the team. I know we were bad on Sunday but do you think the amount of bile on display is because we expect more from the team we have. I remember many poor games during the Kear era when the total game plan was 5 barges and a kick. The problem then was that we knew that it would be the same game plan the following week until Solomona came along.

Rubbish. Agar changed a team playing well. We are very equal to Hull Kr if not better we were 44.0 down you plum.Agar finished 11th last year with a excellent team. I'm not judging him on 7 games I've judged him for 3 years now. First season excellent 2nd poor 3rd poor so far errors the same.

Ah that old chestnut of Kears only tactic was 5 drives and a kick. The comment of the clueless man. The only time these tactics were employed on anything approaching a regular basis was his last season in 2011 when the team he had was, quite frankly, dire and the players didn't have the capability to play any other way. Yet that team still didn't get the wooden spoon. Most seasons we played good stuff, especially 08 & 09 when Brough was pulling the strings.

Agar deserves more time yet but his mask is slipping and he needs now to start making improvements and getting results.

All at the expense of anything and everything that didn't concern 1st team matters, in particular the youth set up which is still trying to recover from the John Kear years!

He did the job in 2006 but after that his tenure as head coach was all fur coat and no knickers

The youth set up is a different argument and whilst you may well have a valid point Agars team choices are no better in that regard.

Can't quite make my mind up on this one, because in one sense it is contradictory.

The disappointment about Sunday was because we had played so well in the previous three games. So we are playing well this year. The disappointment about Bradford was because our team had looked promising against Salford.

So out of the games so far, we had played well and lost against two sides thought to be better than ours (one of which is still unbeaten), and had played well and won against two poor sides (one of which has now shown itself to be a decent side).

So on the season as a whole, our form has been good. The frustration is that of the two games when we have been rubbish, Bradford and Hull KR, they have been games that are crucial to our survival.

The youth set up is THE most vital area of the club, especially our club because we don't have the money to buy in top class players. As a sport we can't compete with RUs money and we can't lure the best or even second best Players from down under anymore. The only way forward is to grow your own and in that regard Agar is light years beyond Kear who simply wasn't interested in anything below the SL team. As a result the whole structure of youth development was destroyed and but for Tony Drury and his GF Winning Academy the club was a laughing stock. Agars been nothing but supportive of the structures below his first team and is a big advocate of creating a pathway through for the young ones.

Be careful what you wish for is all I'm saying!