Thats par for the course for some of the Cas posters that contribute to the Wakey forum. They come on here as the epitome of moderation then go and spout their real feelings trying to whip up anti-wakey trash talk on the other scumbag forum they post on.

Indeed they do and Fully is one of the prime movers; his perfidiousness has been exposed several times recently by myself, G Price FC and others and as a result, he has zero credibility.

Every cloud has a silver lining though - since his multiple personalities were revealed, he posts here far less often, which is a boon.

And yet your immaturity still knows no bounds.

You've exposed nothing; only what you like to believe and more often than not construed to support your own bitter, twisted, boring arguments.

Quite possibly but it has been dealt with now and two statutory objections have been removed by resolution. These things do take time as you know... so, how are Opus getting on with the Travel Plan for Tesco on Wheldon Road? The application goes in, in just a few weeks does it not? Do you think there travel plan will be 'dealt with' prior to submission?



Well you know what thinking does for you mate... you still think that Wheldon Road has not been allocated for housing in the LDF, despite it being in black and white in the housing land supply table of the site specific LDF document. Yes, it was indeed removed as a specific housing site (as Cas and Ben Bailey originally wanted!) in favour of the whole Wheldon Road area been given SPA status but if you look in the table, right there in the housing section under 'Housing Land Supply' it says - SPA N9; Site Name, N101 Castleford Tigers Ground, Wheldon Road; Total Identified Housing Capacity, 105; 2008/09 to 2015/16, 21; 2016/17 to 2021/22, 84.

Don't forget this bit either - "The special policy areas will help meet the requirements for both housing and employment land, as shown in the housing land supply table in chapter 6, Housing Proposals and the employment land supply in chapter 7, Employment Proposals."

You are right, an SPA gives more flexibility to move this allocation elsewhere within the SPA, so where do you suggest they build those 105 houses instead then? Don't ask Nestle and Aeternum Capital for it to be moved to their sites because they are very likley to be leading the objections to the supermarket application... because they both want a Supermarket as well... and to be honest, I feel Aeternum Capital might have a very good case!



I feel that the days for enlightening you about anything to do with Newmarket are long gone... you have shown your true colours recently (which is a shame, because I thought you where above them) and it resides with the small 'hypocrites are us' bunch of Cas supporters who only see flaws in the Newmarket plan (which is far from perfect, but as you know I feel the positives outweigh the negatives reasonably substantially) but think that the Opus plan for Wheldon Road is perfect in every detail (despite having not actually seen it yet) and without any problems or issues at all... if only development and regeneration was that simple!

You are priceless Fully, you really are... lets looks at what you say here eh - rlhttp://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f... and you don't consider this even slightly bitter and twisted, despite everything and Cas almost certainly (and rightly so) being in SL next year?

As for what you like to believe, well I KNOW you only choose to believe what you want to believe while you are quite happy to ignore any information, no matter how black and white, that contradicts this belief in any way... never mind being a journalist... you should join a cult... you would be a perfect member of any cult!

Whooosh... over you head yet again and you fail to see any irony and hypocrisy in your argument or position.

You are such a numpty and claim to be a trainee journalist, yet you don't have any idea about how print media actually works!!! The article is not a NEWS piece, it doesn't need to have any balance or even an alternative argument, because it is an OPINION based piece... this is not the BBC! Newspapers are full of them... every morning... I am sure a budding journalist like you occasionally reads a quality paper?

You fail to even understand the concept of arguing about the inclusion of the piece, which you are actually doing in this thread, which is childish and bitter at best, versus actually presenting and arguing against the points raised in TRB's opinion based article and then castigating others for being bitter and twisted in this thread!

You are genuinely unbelievable and the worst things is... you clearly and wholeheartedly think you are being balanced and reasoned in your posts, while everyone else is clearly biased!!!

To avoid any further avoidance of doubt just so you can be happy and don't have to write long winded-replies and so I am not wasting your time or any other person's for that matter. You are right, I am wrong. Everything I say, have ever said and will say will be wrong. There, everybody happy. And yes, that is me saying that I simply cannot be d any more. It's getting beyond petty; I am entitled to my opinions, I am entitled to disagree with comments and I am entitled to state what I believe. If you disagree, fine.

Thanks IA,

Maybe Big Alf will come back and accept what I wrote was factually correct.

Where in this thread?

Only "Sesquipedalian" has claimed to have written facts.

When are you ever going to learn? once again IA has made you look,to use his term a numpty, and a right one at that, so much so that you have had one almighty hissy fit and rivalled him as to who made you look more stupid, him or you, your problem is that your opinions are based on other peoples and look ridiculous against people like IA who deals in facts and experience mainly, and fwiw your the one showing petulance nobody else, the good thing for you is you hopefully you will grow out of it with maturity hth.

Wow!!

My thoughts too.

Finally getting to him is it?