Unless your Briscoe, Fox, Welham, Colbon, Murrell, Netherton, Watts, Wheeldon etc...

Another biased slant on the story by a B&W.

Morgan doesn't have an aussie bias, he just doesn't get along with Cooke. For what ever reason he has never really fitted in with JM's plans and a move to wakey may be what he needs to reignite his form which for us has been only seen in small doses.

Ok well I wont hijack the Trinity board and get into a debate about it so we will leave that there.
I did notice though you didnt dispute my fact about all thats needed to get the best out of Cookie was a 'good' coach who knows what he's doing !!!

this will add a lot to the squad imho , i will judge cooke on performances and behaviour whilst at our club ... i along with many got taught a lesson when we signed Moore and the other bad boys.

Can clauses be put in loan contracts for example Cooke not being be allowed to play at the weekend against Rovers ?
As much as Morgan wanted rid of Cookie I bet he never had the balls not to put one in if he can.

All loan deals between SL clubs have clauses in them that prevent playing against parent clubs. I don't expect Cooke's to be any different (and I'm still awaiting proper confirmation of a deal, as the HDM is less accurate than Viz when facts are involved).

That's not true Hull had Nick Scruton on loan from Leeds a few years back and not only did he play against them he scored against them

That's your clue.

Could be a really good signing at Wakefield or could be a case of too many cooks (no pun intended!!!) and fall out with Brough over who is marshalling the side.

Will definately assist with distribution for sure

korkis on loan from hudds for a season, he played on Saturday. Explain that one

Baddum tisch !!!

If it's true, then his position is the only issue of debate. He is a quality player. Am I right in thinking that his signing for Rovers was a board decision taken without Morgan's input, which may explain something? You wouldn't want to leave BJ out or Brough, and so loose forward has to be the preferred option. I know he used to play there sometimes at Hull FC, and now at Rovers (or is it "back then"?). If so, we would now have a strong set of props, plus some quick and mobile second row and loose options, with Johnson, Ferguson, JD, Morrisson, and Cooke.

If someone is injured he may play in the half's

Ainscough can't play against Wigan, explain that one

So maybe it has to be drawn up into the contract and it isnt a gernal rule about not being able to play against your parent club ??!?!
Who knows, but I bet your hoping he doesnt play !!

It would be a matter of agreement between the two clubs, depending on how much the club receiving the player needs him. Wigan want game time for Ainscough, and he was getting it elsewhere, and so Wigan had the upper hand in the agreement.