It get's more and more difficult to back your coach when he insists in experimenting when there is nothing wrong in the first place.
Needs to prioritise his games better.

first time poster . fan since 1967. I have seen a lot of ups and downs in my time as a wakey fan and you think you would get used to it. however , after travelling to hull yesterday and witnessing the utter shambles played out in front of my disbelieving eyes I felt I had to put pen to paper ,so to speak.
to the fans who cheered when they heard mathers wasn`t playing . well you got what you deserved . not only is he the best fullback at the club , he is the best we can afford . get off his back and stop hoping he cocks up just so you can bag him . saddos.
the best run we have had with agar as a coach was pure accident . he had to play a proper hooker due to aitons injury , a player who couldn`t get a game all season and then flogs him- andy ellis.
he has a blind spot with certain players , washbrook being the worst. a player that can`t pass , run or catch . please don`t point to his tackling stats as they are gained by being 2nd/3rd man in tackle.
he loans out players like wildie and walshaw - we could do with them now , couldn`t we?
he changes a team playing quite well as an experiment in a winnable game - for gods sake superleague must be our priority . if you want to experiment agar you should have waited for the cup - I don`t care if leeds put 80 past us next week,we ain`t gonna win the challenge cup.
as for the players lack of effort yesterday - if I was a player I`d be bloody confused about his team selection and game plan- if he has one.
all of the above seriously calls into question his judgement of players , team selection and tactical nouse.
if we could afford to get rid we should - but I know we can`t , so it`s fingers crossed and hope for the best.
you only have to look at cas to see how a structured , well coached team can perform with the right guy in charge . playing for each other and out performing their individual ability.

Can I just clarify......why would the players be confused because he changed the team?
Both Sammut and Sykes have played the positions they were allocated.

Not one player finished without a missed tackle. I reckon they knew what to do there.

As I've said, Agar has to take some responsibility as made the changes but nothing he changed meant the players should perform so badly.

agree completely. feel sorry for my boss mr brown. we have been at the ground for the last 2 weeks , ripped out all the foundations on one stand and renewed them. barrowed all the muck out and all the concrete in. set all the bolts. hard enough for us to do but he is the guy that paid us and as a wakey fan I thought after the game yesterday mr b will be gutted. so many people putting so much effort in to be let down so badly by the team you have paid your hard earned to support. no effort , no aggression. our pack got absolutely walked over. they were a joke.
defence was absolutely abysmal. the whole thing was a disgrace. if I had my way and if we do the bases on the north stand, I would send that 17 to do all the barrowing and labouring, show them how the other half live and what others are doing on their behalf.
the only 2 that I would leave out would be reece lyne. taulima tautai

Go to the games hard working people paid plenty to watch that tripe Sunday.

Why do you assume I didn't go to the game and spend my hard earned money. The fact over the many years I have watched Wakefield I have seen much worse performances. I guess I am more pragmatic than some on here but you should never mistake this for a desire not to see Wakefield win every game.
The arguments about Agar's success being based on 7 games could equally apply to the period Kear was in charge, the run we had when Harbin coached the team. I know we were bad on Sunday but do you think the amount of bile on display is because we expect more from the team we have. I remember many poor games during the Kear era when the total game plan was 5 barges and a kick. The problem then was that we knew that it would be the same game plan the following week until Solomona came along.

Rubbish. Agar changed a team playing well. We are very equal to Hull Kr if not better we were 44.0 down you plum.Agar finished 11th last year with a excellent team. I'm not judging him on 7 games I've judged him for 3 years now. First season excellent 2nd poor 3rd poor so far errors the same.

Ah that old chestnut of Kears only tactic was 5 drives and a kick. The comment of the clueless man. The only time these tactics were employed on anything approaching a regular basis was his last season in 2011 when the team he had was, quite frankly, dire and the players didn't have the capability to play any other way. Yet that team still didn't get the wooden spoon. Most seasons we played good stuff, especially 08 & 09 when Brough was pulling the strings.

Agar deserves more time yet but his mask is slipping and he needs now to start making improvements and getting results.

All at the expense of anything and everything that didn't concern 1st team matters, in particular the youth set up which is still trying to recover from the John Kear years!

He did the job in 2006 but after that his tenure as head coach was all fur coat and no knickers

The youth set up is a different argument and whilst you may well have a valid point Agars team choices are no better in that regard.