It said on radio leeds that we are 'very likely' to have the maximum six points deducted for going into adminstration..
Thanks RFL prove to everyone how totally fair your rules and regulations are...

Bring it on, I don't care what they do now. We must all know that 'more than likely' we are NL next season, so as long as we do the best we can whenever we can, that will do me. Ambition despite adversity means more than being handed a place when it isn't deserved.

If you get more than -4 points the sports a discrace.

We know the mitigating circumstances which saw Crusaders' deduction reduced - taking foward and committing to repaying some of the pre- administration debt.

Wakefield haven't formally come out of admimistration yet, and we don't know what mitigating circumstanced might apply.

Or maybe you do, as you seem so sure that the penalty should be reduced ... care to share your knowledge?

Your defence of everything "expansionism" is admirable, but what the poster actually wrote wasIf [/sizeyou get more than -4 points the sports a discrace.[/i

I suggest you dismount, Lester.

EDIT: Hold my hand up - I now see your point (even if the other guy is right )

If we get more than a 6 point deduction, it's fairly clear we have not taken on any debt, if that is the case then the RFL are right and it is as good an indication as any that we are playing NL1 next year.

I think it's daft politics by the RFL. Let's face it, the difference between a four or six point deduction is unlikely to make much of an impact on our final placing. They could make it four points and look like they are treating us the same as Crusaders. By deducting six points, they give the conspiracy theorists something to scream about.

Correct slugger, they will clearly win more games than us this season so whats the point?

Yes but what if Crusaders go bust again and dont pay back the 700k?. Cant be making much money or wouldnt have gone bust last time round. Much the same as us.

Then the RFL will be the proud owners of a football club.

We got shafted when we first got promoted and had no SL money for two years. Just think how different things might have been had we had that (and got rid of Ted and cronies much sooner).

Over a decade on and we are still getting shafted

Fair point, any theories how the FA would feel bout this?. Just to take our minds off other issues.

but hang on mate ted did a good job.

You mean borrowing another £700k off the sports governing body and promising to pay it back over the next 10 years, assuming they stay in Super League and can afford the payments. But what happens if they don't get their licence renewed ?? After all they must lose some points from their francise application for going into administration........surely ?? What do you mean no? How is that possible??
Oh I forgot Mr Rimmer and Mr Wood are the world's biggest hypocrites and are running the game like their own private plaything.
I am quite frankly sick of the whole thing and wish they would disappear up their own ..........