Ive stuck by him but hes had chance to show something and hasnt. His goalkicking is terrible hes slow, 1 half decent pass a game tackling not great. I personally think we would be mad to give him a contract. What do you guys think??

I bet thats comforting for him

I'll be more than happy to drive him back to Hull, never to return .

I've nothing against Paul Cooke and have admired his ability in the past but on the evidence of his performances in a Trinity shirt I would'nt be offering him any kind of deal for the future.

Yep. Agree with what the Clan said!

+1 but I could say the same about most of our back line - Gleeson, Blanch and Blaymire aren't SL standard either.

Thought he's played well in the last two games. If the changing room is harmonious keep him on, I noticed yesterday too that he was doing most of the talking and pointing at players to get in position. He's looking like breaking the line everytime he steps now.

Yeah i agree what the clan says also.

WHAT THE FECK DO YOU ALL EXPECT?

Cooke is playing in a team that is been dominated down the middle, how the hell can the guy make something with that fact?

Give him a sodding break- If its players that need your rollockings is the s in the middle.

I wondered when this thread may have opened. How can he be judged when hes played out of position in every game hes played???

Ok hes not exactly lit the world up but hes the only out there organising and trying to create things. BJ may as well of not played yesterday as he didnt do a thing! One other thing - who will goal kick if we dont play Paul Cooke???

Once we get a decent half-back who can take the team around the park and move Cooky to 13 then we can judge him.

You've got to be joking about BJ! Had he not played yesterday they would have scored 50+. The amount of times he was stuck out on the wing covering for Gleason was ridiculous. No wonder we struggle to create when one of our half backs is covering the wingman.

you dont say

i hope you don't mean your gonna stay there with him