Apparently maximum 33% of capacity but could be as low as 17% when crowds are allowed to return to stadiums in October.
Depends on Covid risk assessments of individual grounds.
I wonder where this will leave Belle Vue, it's not very good news for a return of cash flow for the club.

I thought I'd seen an interview with MC saying capacity would allow most of our season ticket holders have entry when we were playing in front of crowds. That he thought some ticket holders might not be attending due to shielding.

Yes, I remember him saying that. He also said we have 2,200 season ticket holders, but due to the Older demographic, he doesn’t think all ticket holders would be attending games just yet. I think he also said a 33% capacity allowance would give us a crowd of just over 2,500, and paid for match day tickets would be a premium. Let’s hope clubs will be allowed to have some fans attend.

Won’t affect Hudds at all and I’m not joking it won’t. The easiest way around it is to hire Oakwell, we only be restricted twice on ground capacity, again not joking. We’d need some mortgage relief but if it Gigot cash in it might work out better, obviously it might not, just thinking out loud.

Don't think you're allowed to use terracing, just seats. Obviously social distancing drastically reduce the numbers allowed in the seating area.

They apparently had 1000 spectators at a cricket friendly game, don’t think that would be a problem due to the fact that after half an hour they were probably all asleep . But it’s a start

Not sure if it's appropriate but they let them use the terracing/bankings in the NRL, what's the difference anyway in sitting or standing?

Sorry even I don’t understated what that last bit meant and I was sober when I posted it.

I think it’s probably more to do with the roof or lack of.

Technically if there isn’t a roof then you are outdoors with less restrictions - ie no masks. Now I’m as confused as the next man with gov regs but that would be my guess. If there was no roof on the north stand it would effectively be an open air space, bit ironic when you consider how many years we struggled with it a roof.

Bearing in mind it would be home supporters only at first - and if it is "seating only" the East Stand has a roof anyway!
We could use the open West Terrace though......
Maybe the front rows of the East/North stands that aren't under cover???
But as you say Vasty very confusing......

Yes technically the East stand is covered by a roof but with the number of holes I am sure it could be argued that it is in fact open to the elements.

It's probably the hot air emissions given off by your constant whining that's causing the holes where you sit.

I am beginning to fear you are showing worrying tendencies towards stalking. I am afraid that the roof contains more than just the one hole but if it makes you feel justified to help you with your problems go for it.

I've told you before that thankfully the only thing we have in common is Wakefield Trinity although I can't imagine why you would want to support a club you clearly have nothing but disdain for, as for stalking you perhaps you could help me out here by not being so negative about the club and using rlfans as a platform to voice your obvious bitterness, and perhaps you could find it in your heart to say something positive or do you see it as a sign of weakness, or maybe you could even ask for a different seat away from this hole in the roof, that way it will be one thing less for you to moan about and might lessen your fear that I'm stalking you,

I think the majority of the seats available hole free have been taken. I have no problem with the club despite what you believe, I may not always accept what they do but that is called free speech and why we have a forum. I am sure you had many things to criticise in the past or are you quite happy to accept all that the club does regardless of the administration in charge.