Exact CCJ Details
Date Court Amount Status Case Number Date Paid
30/01/2013 NORTHAMPTON CCBC £3,938 Judgement 2XJ22270 -
19/01/2013 WAKEFIELD £10,001 Judgement 2YL54167 -
08/01/2013 NORTHAMPTON CCBC £9,932 Judgement 2XN29534 -
29/11/2012 NORTHAMPTON CCBC £5,878 Satisfied 2JM29828 31/01/2013

Yet another ccj in January although the day after we satisfied one from November.

Surely they cant all be Macron!!!!

Poor form by the club and people running it.

Its not a great advert for the club.

Lets hope it gets sorted and no more are set to follow.

Doesn't look good hopefully it will get sorted quickly we never seem to learn. I noticed cas has a ccj filed against them the other week too so we are not alone.

Same old, same old. Strange, I got slagged off on here by some not so long ago when I said we were skint again. As is said above, they surely can't all be macron claims. And in any case once a ccj is issued the court has already decided in the claiments favour, whether we dispute it or not. Taking it to a higher court is a very costly risk. Some kind of clarification would be nice though I doubt it will happen.

The ups and downs of being a Trin fan. Lets get this new stadium sorted ASAP that's whats needed once that's a certainty new investment/ business plans can follow

Yep i'm afraid Belle Vue bless it is now a millstone around our neck and is bleeding us dry. We really HAVE to be in Newmarket by the start of 2015.

It doesn't matter whether Cas, Bradford etc have 1 or 10, the simple fact is we keep lurching from one financial disaster to another without ever learning any lessons and just repeating the cycle. Absolutely gutted, i thought and hoped these days had gone, i guess not.

At the rate the club are running up CCJ's it makes you wonder if our business model can last till 2015.

I suppose that depends on whether its can't pay or won't pay.

Businesses will be put off from dealing with the club if this becomes the norm, well more normal than it already appears to be.

Certainly means getting credit is a no-no which as a young company is a worry. Other than the half a million loan from West Yorkshire Windows that is.

I hope thats not the policy, it would be madness to take that attitude. Refusing to pay gains nothing and only adds massive legal and court costs to the original debt.

Also if more debtors are waiting for payment they may see all this and not bother with the CCJ route and go direct to a winding up petition.

As usual, the silence from the club is deafening.

CCJ's do not necessarily mean financial problems, they can be a sign of a dispute where both sides refuse to budge. A few years ago I took Carphone Warehouse to the small claims court and won my case. In preparation I did some research and I ran a D+B on them and they had 100's of CCJ's against their name.

They are listed on the stock exchange and have very good financial results. I don't see anyone worrying about their financial future.

Without knowing the facts I think we should not get carried away. As Clive Dunn used to say "Don't Panic!"

Firstly to use carphone warehouse as an example,is just silly.They are part of a international group of companies,established for over 25 years,with a positive(millions and millions) balance sheet.Not a new start business with a negative balance sheet.
Secondly the dispute has already been resolved --- by the court -- we lost!!!

The facts are quite simple,weve been found against by the court in each of these matters.We could then still have avoided having the ccj registered and in the public domain,if we had then paid up within 30 days.
I dont have an issue with businesses going to court over disputes,but it is foolish in the extreme once youve been found against not to pay up within 30 days.