FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Wakefield Trinity > Would you rather stay at Belle Vue or move?
76 posts in 6 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1841
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2023Aug 2021LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



In light of the ongoing uncertainty regarding our home of the future I thought I'd poll for fans' views.

If we were able to decide on our future home would you rather move to a sy new, purpose built stadium in Newmarket? Or would you rather redevelop where we are at Belle Vue?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach13811
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200618 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Although I've voted to stay at BV I'm easy either way, however what's swung it for BV was the proximity to the city. NM is too far out of the city limits for my liking. Thornes Park would've been the winner hands down. The benefits of a new development whilst retaining a city centre status.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach5086No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2022Nov 2022LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I've gone for Belle Vue but that is based on the redevelopment being done to a decent standard. If changes are going to be purely cosmetic then I think Belle Vue has had it's day sadly. With some new stands and the facilities that can go with that Belle Vue would win for me every time due to it's history and it's location.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11580
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Sep 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Personally I'd like see BV developed to a decent standard, NM is a long way to travel for a lot of fans without transport and imo would put off quite a few which would negate any new following we might get from the move, and I'm far from convinced that visiting fans' from other clubs' would significantly improve, Two new stands on the east and west sides' of the ground with floodlights' should be achievable so the north stand could be left as it is, also leave the flats for the corporate business and we've cracked it icon_razz.gifRAY:

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach36107
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: chissitt "Personally I'd like see BV developed to a decent standard, NM is a long way to travel for a lot of fans without transport and imo would put off quite a few which would negate any new following we might get from the move, and I'm far from convinced that visiting fans' from other clubs' would significantly improve, Two new stands on the east and west sides' of the ground with floodlights' should be achievable so the north stand could be left as it is, also leave the flats for the corporate business and we've cracked it
In my anorak capacity it would probably be the other way around. I would imagine the club would go for an all singing all dancing main stand with loads of corporate and other facilities. This would create a more saleable product with bigger margins and a better revenue stream. Unfortunately in pure economic terms the average standing fan gives the lowest return. To be honest I'd be happy enough, standing on a slightly wonk terrace has never put me off, watching wonky teams certainly has.

The big or extra money we need would IMHO come through the corporate side or at least to start with. Also people and players are impressed by those kind of facilities in a way a nicely maintained terrace never will.

So I would expect a structure rebuild of BV over a number of years starting foist with the grounds biggest inadequacy - it's with noting that those flats have been a god send through the years but they have a shelf life and more importantly a ceiling on what people will pay to use them. We get far less for a box than say Leeds even taking into account the on field product end general bigness of Leeds. That and other lack of modern facilities must be addressed firs.

So again for me - buy the land first - then the main facility - then if there is anything left maybe the away stand (north) so as we don't put off the high spending away fans. I reckon the west stand should be a supporter (supporters trust) run initiative which was common in the past.

Anyway who knows what we will have to play with for now.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach36107
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: wildshot "In light of the ongoing uncertainty regarding our home of the future I thought I'd poll for fans' views.

If we were able to decide on our future home would you rather move to a sy new, purpose built stadium in Newmarket? Or would you rather redevelop where we are at Belle Vue?'"


Logically NM was always best.

But for me personally and most existing club fans BV is where we really want to be I suspect.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman1470
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 1970Jun 2022LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I must be in the minority, but I fear any redevelopment of BV will be marginal and won't take us forward. Redeveloping BV is still just prolonging a move to another stadium. There simply isn't enough land and modern facilities that are now expected at top flight sports.

I love BV, the history heck even how close it is to the city centre, but there will be a time when we must move and so long as the financial support is there to allow a move then I'm behind it.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11905No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Even though it would take me three times as long to get NM Id prefer to move there as BV has had its day for me, regardless of any sort of redevelopment. I can't see much being done to improve the stadium other than a bit of paint here and there.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2412No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Belle Vue would win for me, even without the development.

RankPostsTeam
International Star17982
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



If we were talking like for like facilities at either venue, then BV wins hands down.
However, new purpose built stadium over dated crumbling ground, Newmarket wins every time.
So it really depends what the options are.

IF Sir Rodney can get the stadium sorted at NM then that would still be the way forward.
As Vasty has said, the potential for increased income would make it a far better option.

Just to add something else to the debate, how many old grounds would we prefer to go to, out of:

Wilderspool
Central Park
Boulevard
Craven Park
Naughton Park
Knowlsley Road
Fartown
The Willows

Apart from nostalgia, all of the new grounds are a vast improvement on what was there before and in
20 years time, new memories will replace the old.
Although we will all have fond memories of visiting The Boulevard or Central Park etc, the new stadia
are in all cases a vast improvement.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11580
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Sep 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: vastman "In my anorak capacity it would probably be the other way around. I would imagine the club would go for an all singing all dancing main stand with loads of corporate and other facilities. This would create a more saleable product with bigger margins and a better revenue stream. Unfortunately in pure economic terms the average standing fan gives the lowest return. To be honest I'd be happy enough, standing on a slightly wonk terrace has never put me off, watching wonky teams certainly has.

The big or extra money we need would IMHO come through the corporate side or at least to start with. Also people and players are impressed by those kind of facilities in a way a nicely maintained terrace never will.

So I would expect a structure rebuild of BV over a number of years starting foist with the grounds biggest inadequacy - it's with noting that those flats have been a god send through the years but they have a shelf life and more importantly a ceiling on what people will pay to use them. We get far less for a box than say Leeds even taking into account the on field product end general bigness of Leeds. That and other lack of modern facilities must be addressed firs.

So again for me - buy the land first - then the main facility - then if there is anything left maybe the away stand (north) so as we don't put off the high spending away fans. I reckon the west stand should be a supporter (supporters trust) run initiative which was common in the past.

Anyway who knows what we will have to play with for now.'"


In an ideal world your right, the problem is though as far as I know we don't have those sort of finances available to us and my thoughts' centred on saving money where possible, that's why imo it would have been more realistic to keep the flats' and the partly covered north stand and spend what money we could get on the more important things' like two new stands' down each side even if they are not high spec, if we had them built over two seasons it would greatly improve the ground without trying to achieve something what is probably beyond us assuming of course we could secure the ground.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach5086No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2022Nov 2022LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: wrencat1873 "If we were talking like for like facilities at either venue, then BV wins hands down.
However, new purpose built stadium over dated crumbling ground, Newmarket wins every time.
So it really depends what the options are.

IF Sir Rodney can get the stadium sorted at NM then that would still be the way forward.
As Vasty has said, the potential for increased income would make it a far better option.

Just to add something else to the debate, how many old grounds would we prefer to go to, out of
Central Park - Probably the only one where I would prefer the old ground. Don't really like the DW at all.
Boulevard - I like the KC as a stadium and it's location is brilliant, much better than being stood 50 yards away like at the Boulevard
Craven Park - Didn't go this season so not sure what it is like now, but can't be worse can it?
Naughton Park - Nice stadium again, but like with most new ones I'd prefer some standing room
Knowlsley Road - New stadium is a definite massive improvement
Fartown - Can't even remember their old ground any more
The Willows - Reasonable new stadium, awful location - Could this happen with Newmarket if it were to come off?

Apart from nostalgia, all of the new grounds are a vast improvement on what was there before and in
20 years time, new memories will replace the old.
Although we will all have fond memories of visiting The Boulevard or Central Park etc, the new stadia
are in all cases a vast improvement.'"



For me you're right on all counts except Wigan and I can't put my finger on why I don't like it. Maybe it's again a nostalgia thing associated with visiting what was the biggest and best RL club during my early years of supporting. Central Park just holds more memories for me than most of the others but I'm really not sure why.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11580
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Sep 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: wrencat1873 "If we were talking like for like facilities at either venue, then BV wins hands down.
However, new purpose built stadium over dated crumbling ground, Newmarket wins every time.
So it really depends what the options are.

IF Sir Rodney can get the stadium sorted at NM then that would still be the way forward.
As Vasty has said, the potential for increased income would make it a far better option.


Just to add something else to the debate, how many old grounds would we prefer to go to, out of

As you and vasty say there is potential there for an increase in attendances' and all the extra revenue that go with it but there are no guarantees' this will happen, attendances have dropped alarmingly at Wakey as well as across SL in general with the odd exception, of the eight clubs you have mentioned Widnes and HKR haven't moved just had work done on them with no visible increase in attendances' Shudds gates have dropped Wire having got increased gates when they first moved have not improved, Hull Wigan and Saints agreed as for Salford there just abysmal full stop, but one thing they all have in common except arguably Salford is that they all have moved just round the corner, whereas we would be moving what 8 miles' from BV and even further for a lot more, there is a good argument for a lot of fans' wanting to stay where we are.

RankPostsTeam
International Star5080
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201411 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I'm just going to quote a post I made earlier in another thread

Quote: The Avenger "Agreed, and I've said before, if Wigan, Huddersfield, Sts or anybody who's left their spiritual home had the chance to go back and totally redevelop that ground rather than move to another location I'm sure they'd all take it.

If we erect modern stands with all the facilities and equal Hospitalty opportunities that a new stadium would offer then I for one would be extremely happy. The ghosts and spirits of countless players past resides in this turf and there's something untangable, almost unidentifiable that we'd have to sacrifice if we moved.

I'm all for a modern and almost total redevelopment of the stands but to retain the playing surface that has been graced by legends for almost a century and a half would help to inspire future young players to don their Trinity shirts and tread in the footsteps of rugby Gods like Neil Fox and Jonty Parkin.'"


RankPostsTeam
International Star219No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 201410 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2017Oct 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



New stadium, be it NM or wherever, although this appears to be looking more and more unlikley.

Been going to Belle Vue 30 years. Take the nostalgia out of it and its a dump. Our dump admittedly, but a dump all the same. Access is poor, parking is poor, terraces are poor, facilities are poor etc etc
Im pretty certain that if the money is found to buy it back, there wont be much left over in any pot to do it up to a required standard or to the standard some are hoping for and thats before we have thought about buying the superbowl land as well.

I have my fingers crossed that something major can come out of all this YC/Community Trust thing but my head is telling me a positive result at this point would be the ground been bought from the BOI (to be owned by whoever??) and the old girl getting a lick of paint, until the next new stadium campaign comes around???

76 posts in 6 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing
76 posts in 6 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, PopTart , kinleycat , Wildthing



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


13.41015625:10
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1s
Ground Improvements
phe13
198
1s
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
1s
How many games will we win
Shifty Cat
48
6s
Film game
karetaker
5766
18s
Shopping list for 2025
HU8HFC
5588
30s
Fixtures 2025
Wigan Bull
10
33s
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
tad rhino
2611
41s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Theeaststand
4048
1m
Fixtures
Hockley Bron
12
1m
Opening Championship and League One Fixtures for 2025 Released
RLFANS News
1
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Shirt reveal coming soon
Khlav Kalash
2
TODAY
Opening Championship and League One Fixtures for 2025 Released
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Getting a new side to gel
Wigan Bull
2
TODAY
Fixtures
Hockley Bron
12
TODAY
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS