Never in a million years was that a try....

ok

Very dubious to say the least. Think it was more benefit of doubt than anything.

it was history says so,

it was said tonight that you can make a try if you slow it down enough and tonight was proof, I would be more concerned with the fox try I didn't see the ball at all on the screen

Fox's was fine. About his only valuable contribution tonight.

Thought Obst's was dubious myself, need to see myself on the replay.

will watch the game later tonight to see it

Newton's for Rovers and Obst's try should have been scrubbed off.

his face gave it away it was well over the line by at least 20 mm

The HKR player somehow managed to keep his hand in contact with the ball untill he completely lost control after the ball had gone to ground.

Would it have been a try if there wasn't a video ref? - No

Should it have been a try if the spirit of the law was taken into account? - No

Did the exact wording of the law give the VR any other decision other than awarding a try? - No

Should the law be made to clearer to ensure that players are in control when grounding the ball? - Yes

Will that happen? - Well, we all know how many "sensible" folk are at the RFL so obviously nothing will change!

It might be a first but I agreed with every decision tonight!

Except from Latu's hit on Gene being high!!!

I don't know if I'm thinking of the right one, but there was one where an high tackle was given, but it was clear in the replay that the initial impact was at the chest...could have been that one.

As for Grix's try, I think that was correct too...

Could not believe it was given.

welcome to our world