Just been reading on the message boards for other clubs as I do from time to time.

It seems that Mullally isnt over popular at Leeds.

I know hes contracted and a fee would be involved but would it be worth a punt in putting in a cheeky bid for him6

Leeds will be atleast wanting 300k+ for him
I would have him back but feel that boat has sailed.

He was great for us last season and probably made more impact than any of the other mid season signings. This is more impressive when you take into account that he had already signed his deal with leeds so wasn't playing for a contract.

After what he did for us last season I thought he would be great at Leeds but for whatever reason this hasn't happened. That ssid I cant see leeds letting him go but if they did I would be delighted if we could get him.

I'd take him.
We should watch what's happening because they will have a fire sale at the end of the season to get the team they want and I can see him being pushed out.

The good thing for us is that he'd be free if that happened.

I agree Pop Tart.

With Scruton going, and it be likely that Anderson is too.

Our front row options could look something like Fatifa, England, Simon, Arona, Hirst and Mullally.

Not quite sure as to when Yates and Walkers contract expire, but again, they have gone OK, without really shining. But to be fair, game time for both has been limited. Maybe a case of offloading, to make room, to improve the quality of the squad.

Absolutely. He could have easily come to us and tossed it off for the rest of the season but he was up for the fight and gave 100% every game. I'd have him back tomorrow.

Agree with the exception of Arona who I don't see as a prop.

Arona can do a job at prop but I agree he is more effective at loose forward IMHO.

Mullally would be a great signing for Trinity and may play better at a smaller club with less weight of expectation on his shoulders following a player like Jamie Peacock...hope it happens.

I was speaking to a Giants fan who is normally fairly reasonable about Mullally a coupel of days ago. I was taken aback about how little he rated him, saw him as a bit of a non-trier, especially when the going gets tough - the absolute opposite of what I saw. He suggested it was must have been as he had a point to prove, but not convinced myself; as said above, he already had a contract at Leeds, and had not reason to bust a gut (in what was a poor Wakey side last year).

Maybe he is one of those players who nees the right environment. We seem to get more than our fair share of those who don't quite doo there best elsewhere.

Spot on with that one bloomers, that's true either before or after they've been at Wakey.

I'd have Mullaley back in a heartbeat - he doesn't seem to have fitted in at Leeds and was unloved at Shudds; but he was brilliant in his short spell for us. Even in beaten games, he looked unplayable sometimes.

Was brilliant for us last year he didnt have to give the 100% he did. Would have him back no question. Think Leeds would let us aswell seen as it would not affect the bottom 4 issues

As a Giants fan this is my take on mullaley. He's brilliant going forward and will run hard with the ball in his hands. He relishes that. His fitness is questionable and as a result can be dumb in defence and slow to react in a fast flowing game.
I remember in one game for us he made just 6 tackles and missed 4.
If you have the luxury of being able to field a player who doesn't need to do much defensively but will make 8-10 metres a carry (but don't expect him to do many carries) then he's a good player to have- as long as you appreciate that he will let in soft tries under the posts

That does not describe the player we had with us last year.

In an awful team Mullally stood out a mile.

We were sad to see him leave.

You and Rhinos must have had a different player.

To be fair my 11 year old would look good at prop at side of anderson