|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 21795 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Ellis has spoken on JDs show about this. He says the intention is to assess the extra teams to make sure they are ready. If not then it might nit be 14 teams.
Now I'm quite pro IMG so was not happy about the extras being assessed differently but if what it means is an assessment to make sure the teams in 13 and 14th place are high enough in the rankings to succeed then fair enough. IMG was always about getting a league of As. If expending to 14 means you are letting in a C, then you shouldn't do it.
I guess we'll see whether it's just badly explained.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 18018 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Khlav Kalash:PopTart:
Looks like they are doing an 8 team playoff NRL style. Which I like apart from it being 8 in a 14 team comp. It means you could in theory win the comp while finishing in the bottom half of the league.
Would be better with a top 7 and the first place team gets a week off while 2v7, 3v6 and 4v5 play each other. Although it wouldn't help us this year, the top 5 play off was the best of the lot, with the top 2 having more chance to make the GF.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6316 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2007 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| A lifelong Bulls fan, Nigel Woods, proposes a new structure that gets the Bulls back in the top flight via the only way possible. Or maybe I'm just being cycnical.Broadly, I prefer it, and I agree the Bulls should be in there. They get the crowds, and some new concrete terracing and a roof would Odsal atmospheric. But if London AND Toulouse both get in, nothing is added to the fan experience, and two of the 13 home games would have a poorer atmosphere than in under the current structure. For me, Bulls, York, and London or Oldham. Another idea for me is that the Magic weekend should be scrapped, but every club should have an extra fixture, the same as what would be the Magic fixture, and they are obliged to take it on the road. 7 games a year in new areas. Scotland, Ireland, the south-west, etc.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 10656 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Another farce from Salford last night. Who can trust these supposed new owners to be any different next season if they even stick around or are there in the 1st place. Reason enough for SL to have them eliminated regardless of how they may blag a decent IMG score
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 32344 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 24 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| I expect this move to dock Salford 8 points for fielding a weakened side a bit back is part of the plan to get them out of SL as it would lower their total IMG points. Their owners are clearly very unreliable, displaying all the red flags I remember from 2012-2019 at the Bulls.
Matthew Shaw's article yesterday seemed to say Bradford were assured of a place in the 14 but it made a lot of assumptions. Personally I can't see both Toulouse and London going into the 14 team SL. One of them yes. Definitely not both. On the field York and Toulouse deserve a shot.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 3253 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2018 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| If it has to be Bradford, then it also has to be York.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 32344 | Bradford Bulls |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 24 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Agreed. They're a good side and have a nice stadium.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Academy Player | 348 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2023 | 2 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It’ll be Toulouse via IMG (check their data from last year and this year), then Bradford and London via the ‘independent panel’. I can explain why but I don’t think anyone cares.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 21795 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Having a nice stadium or a good team isn't the point of IMG. It is trying to establish financially stable with growth potential.
The stadium, finances and social media type checks establish that.
So I'm not sure what else an independent group is going to use to decide.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Academy Player | 348 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2023 | 2 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Looks like the lower leagues are being merged too. Big fan of that, and hope they go with a Championship East / Championship West format. There'd be a few mismatches (particularly in the short term for Newcastle and Keighley), but better crowds, less money spent on travel, more consistent end to each season, and a proper season for League One clubs. I assume it'd look something like this:
Championship East
Batley Bradford or York Dewsbury Doncaster Featherstone Goole Halifax Hunslet Keighley Newcastle Sheffield
Championship West
Barrow Midlands Hurricanes North Wales Oldham Rochdale Salford Swinton Whitehaven Widnes Workington
Each team plays home and away. Then top 6 of each division come together for a play off series.
|
|
|
 |
|